• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Stalin manage to assume control over Russia in the five years following the death of Lenin in 1924?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework- Pippa Selby 1. How did Stalin manage to assume control over Russia in the five years following the death of Lenin in 1924? Stalin managed to win the power struggle between many leading powerful politicians and his main opposition Trotsky to become leader of USSR, when Lenin died in 1924. Several factors contributed to Stalin's rise in power including the weaknesses of his opposition which he exploited. Trotsky was another leading Communist and a great speaker and writer about revolutionary ideas. Although he was a well-known figure and popular with the red army and younger party members, however was distrusted by many older Party members, who doubted his loyalty unlike that of Stalin, who they believed was unlikely to split the party because he had always been a loyal member and was not too left or right wing. ...read more.

Middle

Stalin used certain devices to build up his influence in the years before becoming supreme ruler. He joined forces with Zinoviev and Kamenev, old Bolsheviks on the Left Wing of the Party, who helped him defeat Trotsky, subsequently turned on them and defeated them by joining forces with highly intelligent politician Bukharin, and putting forward his ideas on Socialism in One Country which gained him wider support. Finally, Stalin turned on Bukharin and right wing MPs, attacking the NEP which they supported. He now had enough power to have them removed from their posts. Stalin played cunning games in order to gain what he wanted. He played Communist Party groups off against each other, and in doing so, showed himself to the public in a better light. ...read more.

Conclusion

Stalin knew precisely what he wanted and was determined to succeed and therefore his frame of mind had a great deal to do with his progress. Although overcoming Trotsky allowed Stalin to continue his rise to power safely, the fact that he had the position of Party Secretary meant he could control how the party worked to some extent and could easily build up his power by ensuring he had a strong link of supporters inside the Party. Without Stalin's position of General Secretary for the Communist Party it would have been extremely difficult for him to win the power struggle between himself and other politicians and build up his power to such an extent that enabled him to assume complete control over Russia in 1929. I therefore think this was the biggest reason for his success. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * The Allies had delayed invading France until 1944. * This made Stalin very suspicious of the West. He believed that they had wanted the Soviet Union to destroy itself fighting Germany on its own. * Stalin was also suspicious of Soviet soldiers who had surrendered.

  2. How did Stalin manage to secure power in Russia by 1929?

    This made Stalin " by far the cleverer politician... He had out-manoeuvred his arch-rival on every possible front, not least through his skilful manipulation of the 'cult' of Leninism, which was established immediately after the Bolshevik leader's death." (Alan Wood). This contrasts Stalin's implicit skill, with Trotsky's lack of judgement.

  1. How far did Stalin manage to modernize Russia by 1938?

    Fifteen million kulaks were killed, a huge loss not only because of their specialized knowledge which would make collectivization work, but also as a percentage of the class that produced food. We can see their importance from the fact that the poorer peasants (who were supposedly being exploited by kulaks and therefore meant to hate them)

  2. How Did Stalin Manage to Assume control over Russia in the Five years following ...

    Because of lack of votes Zinoviev and Kamenev lost their jobs and soon after were expelled from the Communist Party along with Stalin's greatest problem, Trotsky. Lastly, Stalin removed Bukharin from a position of power, by attacking the NEP, which right wing supporters believed was the only way forward along with the Five Year Plan.

  1. Describe and analyse why, how and to what degree of success were Lenin and ...

    Rasputin was a evil and corrupt man who had many innocent executed. Much hatred grew towards Rasputin who was eventually assassinated in 1916 by a group of nobles. His removal from the head of Russian politics was too little to late to save the Ramonov dynasty as Tsar Nicholas II abdicated in March 1917.

  2. Describe the developments in the power struggle in the USSR in the year 1924-27, ...

    Stalin used this position greatly to his advantage. After the death of Lenin, Stalin was able to use his general secretary position to organise his funeral. Stalin played a ruthless trick on Trotsky by telling him the wrong date of the funeral.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    during the first part of this plan that targets were increased in December 1929, with calls to fulfil the plan ahead of schedule. The emphasis was on strengthening Soviet defences against a hostile invasion. Key features of the plan: 1.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    in return, the state would provide agricultural machinery such as tractors, and help the peasants to farm more efficiently. Most of the peasants opposed the ideas because thay weren�t sure of having enough bread to eat. With they other system they were sure that they won�t starve because they kept

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work