• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Stalin manage to assume control over Russia in the five years following the death of Lenin in 1924?

Extracts from this document...


How did Stalin manage to assume control over Russia in the five years following the death of Lenin in 1924? In 1924 Russia was in a very delicate state. Recovering from an economy in ruins, it was being rebuilt slowly by the NEP (New Economic Policy) the country was gradually growing in wealth with larger industries and factories being returned to their owners, traders were now allowed to buy and sell their goods (this was illegal during war communism) and grain requisitioning was stopped, this meant no grain could be taken from the peasants by force. People were changing as well, the idea of equality was introduced, religion was almost abolished, forbidding anyone under 15 years old to learn about it with churches taken over and priests exiled. Schools were being built and people were beginning to be fed a lot more than in earlier years, where Russians had been starving to death on the streets. ...read more.


When Lenin died as there was no obvious successor. Lenin had left a testament before he died, it did not specify who he had wanted to be leader but it did say who he did not, there was a lot of criticism of Stalin in the testament saying he would become a dictator. This would have been fatal for his success but luckily it was not read out in congress because the other party members had also been criticised and did not want the public to hear about it. Stalin started manipulating his way to power as early as Lenin's funeral where he tricked Trotsky into not appearing, Stalin was chief mourner and in his speech he described himself and Lenin's 'disciple'. This made him very popular among the people and made Trotsky seem arrogant and disrespectful towards Lenin. From the beginning Stalin had been underestimated as a boring secretary who had very little initiative to become the next ruler of Russia, this may have helped him a lot as his rivals did not expect any competition from him. ...read more.


When Zinoviev and Kamenev tried to call for a vote of no confidence against him in 1925 Stalin already had too much control over the delegates and they lost every vote. In 1927 they were expelled from the party. Soon after Bukharin and Trotsky were removed from the politburo and other party bodies. In December 1929 Stalin celebrated his fiftieth birthday as the undisputed leader if the USSR. I believe that the main reason for Stalin's success at assuming control over Russia in those five years was his party members underestimating how cunning he was. They didn't see him as a threat and were too proud to consider him as an able opponent, especially Trotsky. He was very well known as being arrogant and he didn't get involved in political infighting because he thought he was above it. This and the fact that Lenin's Testament wasn't published, this would have crippled Stalin's reputation and destroyed his support base. I believe that these were the two main causes, although the other reasons were very relevant, that led Stalin to complete control ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * All films were state-made, so fully reflected the views and wishes of the Party, plying a vital role in propaganda as well as entertainment. * The press and the radio were given great emphasis by the party. Most towns and cities had loudspeakers set up in prominent places so people could hear Government pronouncements.

  2. How did Stalin manage to secure power in Russia by 1929?

    Stalin had already achieved this through his careful manipulation of party members. Stalin was extremely cunning in the way he formed alliances to eliminate the opposition. For example, Stalin used the triumvirate with Zinoviev and Kamenev to remove Trotsky. Stalin portrayed Trotsky's belief for the end of the NEP as

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    The reforms imposed on Russia were met with resentment and criticism from conservatives as they had lost their 'influence and privilege' while the liberals became frustrated as the Tsar wouldn't take his reforms to their logical conclusions. These two sectors of the political spectrum fuelled with dislike for the Tsarist

  2. How far did Stalin manage to modernize Russia by 1938?

    population being collectivized, there was still resistance in the form of the peasants not trying very hard to do any better. In a country where food levels were always quite low, and were now even lower, this was catastrophic, and goes to show how collectivization had not achieved any of

  1. How effective was Lenin at establishing control in Russia between 1917 and 1924?

    Even though this method of establishing control was effective in seizing power from the Provisional Government, after this revolution Lenin only had power in Petrograd and not the rest of Russia. To gain this control of Petrograd though, Lenin was willing to use a level of force, like the Red

  2. Trotsky - Succession, Revolutionary Success, Civil War Hero, Death, Failure and End

    his eventual downfall, as circumstances were not to allow such a relaxed approach to government. The Bolsheviks faced not only the wrath of the Germans but also the internal threat of anti-Bolsheviks. This 'internal threat' manifested itself in the form of the Russian Civil War fought between 1918 and 1920, in which the Bolsheviks (the Reds)

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Instead, class enemies were frequently made scapegoats. High production costs resulting from inefficient industry meant that prices were higher, so people would not buy products. Inefficiency rather than high wages caused the crisis. 1913 1928 Coal (million tonnes) 29.1 35.5 Oil (million tonnes)

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    If all these deaths wouldn�t have been carried out, probably Russia hadn�t had to confront so many problems. We can know focus on the some of the positive things Stalin gave Russia. First of all, Stalin managed to turn Russia into a powerful nation, modern industrial in 30 years.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work