• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Stalin manage to assume control over Russia in the four years following the death of Lenin in 1924?

Extracts from this document...


1. How did Stalin manage to assume control over Russia in the four years following the death of Lenin in 1924? Lenin died in 1924 leaving a power struggle over who would become leader of the Communist Party in which Stalin and Trotsky were the two main contenders. There are several factors, which led to Stalin beating Trotsky and eventually going on to assume control over the whole of Russia within four years. Probably the most important reason why Stalin was able to triumph over Trotsky was Stalin's status within the party. Stalin, as General Secretary, presided over appointments and membership of the party. This meant that Stalin was able to appoint his own supporters to posts and expel younger, more radical members of the party who were more likely to support Trotsky. Other Communists allowed this to happen because they were concerned about Trotsky becoming a dictator. His post as General Secretary was absolutely vital in bringing about his victory over Trotsky, as it allowed him to pack the Party Congress in 1924 with his own supporters to vote for him over Trotsky. ...read more.


Stalin was particularly astute with regard to his treatment of Trotsky and the way he manipulated others' views of Trotsky. Stalin tricked Trotsky into not attending Lenin's funeral and later played on other people's fears of Trotsky and his radical views to get him expelled from the party. Trotsky's failure to attend Lenin's funeral, though through no fault of his own, made him enemies. People thought that Trotsky couldn't be bothered to turn up and that he had no respect for Lenin. Leading Communists were concerned that Trotsky would move away from Lenin's policies and his failure to attend the funeral enhanced these fears. Meanwhile, as Trotsky seemingly moved away from Lenin, Stalin was busy promoting himself as Lenin's chosen heir and as the stable choice for election. Trotsky's loyalty to the Communists was also in doubt as he had only joined the party in 1917, while Lenin had been a loyal member for over twenty years. Although Trotsky was an excellent orator and had orchestrated victory in the civil war he had many negative personality points that meant he was greatly disliked. ...read more.


The right wing of the party wanted to move more slowly towards Communism and supported the NEP as a means of moving forwards. Stalin used his great astuteness to play off one faction of the party against another. This is a factor that would have been irrelevant if Stalin's great slyness had not enabled him to exploit this party divide to his advantage; even without this divide, given other factors, Stalin would probably have won anyway. All these factors interrelated to enable Stalin to become undisputed leader of Russia in 1929. His position as General Secretary was his power base and enabled him to pack the party with his supporters. His shrewdness and tactics allowed him to get rid of his opposition and also allowed him to cause fighting within the party to his advantage, his dull exterior meaning that while doing these things he was never seen as being a threat to anyone else. Stalin was supported as the more middle-of-the-road Communist, in comparison to Trotsky, and all the above factors worked together to bring about his victory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    The key turning-point was the battle of Stalingrad. * Stalin left military matters to his generals, in particular Marshal Zhukov. Unlike Hitler he did not constantly interfere. He also stayed in the Kremlin to convince the Soviet people that he believed that the Soviet Union would win.

  2. How far did Stalin manage to modernize Russia by 1938?

    Party fanatics such as the Twenty-Five Thousanders were placed in charge of collective farms, but as they were not specialized in agricultural methods, they only led to more inefficiency, and wrong moves, making matters worse. An example is how the theories of one "scientist" were applied to farming, but because they were absolutely fantastical, destroyed several crops.

  1. How effective was Lenin at establishing control in Russia between 1917 and 1924?

    though because the Provisional Government were making mistakes, so when the Bolsheviks popularity had increased Lenin knew the time was right to try and seize power from the government and turn Russia into the first Communist country in the world, and on the night of the 6th and 7th November 1917 the Bolshevik Revolution took place.

  2. How did Stalin manage to secure power in Russia by 1929?

    Similarly, Stalin used Lenin's Enrolment Plan to increase his power. The plan, which aimed to increase the number of members, resulted in over 500,000 workers being recruited. Stalin used this to his advantage, as the majority of the new recruits were politically uneducated workers and so Stalin influenced them to gain support by extending his authority within the party.

  1. In what ways did the careers of Stalin and Trotsky differ in the years ...

    Stalin now having received a more powerful job was still under Trotsky in the power chain and this still left Stalin jealous. In September, Trotsky was elected as the chairman of the Soviet.

  2. Stalin Vs. Trotsky.

    However, the plan completely miscarried. Kamenev, who spoke most sharply in criticism of Stalin at the Congress, was punished by demotion from full member to candidate member of the Politburo. As reconstituted just after the Congress, the Politburo had three new full members: Molotov, Voroshilov, and Kalinin, all loyal henchmen of Stalin's.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Germany was very powerful meaning the USSR must have had considerable strengths. 2. Stalin’s policy of industrialisation meant the USSR had a strong industrial base, allowing it to compete with other powers ï USSR able to significantly out produce Germany in war materials and heavy industry.

  2. How significant were the personalities of the contenders to succeed Lenin in accounting for ...

    Moreover his ability to look into the future and plan his actions to aid his accent was stunning, as if he planned every move meticulously and almost in hindsight. Looking at the evidence, Stalin?s personality was vital in his accent, but perhaps if the others had been different the overall outcome would have drastically changed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work