• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Stalin manage to assume control over Russia in the four years following the death of Lenin in 1924?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1. How did Stalin manage to assume control over Russia in the four years following the death of Lenin in 1924? Lenin died in 1924 leaving a power struggle over who would become leader of the Communist Party in which Stalin and Trotsky were the two main contenders. There are several factors, which led to Stalin beating Trotsky and eventually going on to assume control over the whole of Russia within four years. Probably the most important reason why Stalin was able to triumph over Trotsky was Stalin's status within the party. Stalin, as General Secretary, presided over appointments and membership of the party. This meant that Stalin was able to appoint his own supporters to posts and expel younger, more radical members of the party who were more likely to support Trotsky. Other Communists allowed this to happen because they were concerned about Trotsky becoming a dictator. His post as General Secretary was absolutely vital in bringing about his victory over Trotsky, as it allowed him to pack the Party Congress in 1924 with his own supporters to vote for him over Trotsky. ...read more.

Middle

Stalin was particularly astute with regard to his treatment of Trotsky and the way he manipulated others' views of Trotsky. Stalin tricked Trotsky into not attending Lenin's funeral and later played on other people's fears of Trotsky and his radical views to get him expelled from the party. Trotsky's failure to attend Lenin's funeral, though through no fault of his own, made him enemies. People thought that Trotsky couldn't be bothered to turn up and that he had no respect for Lenin. Leading Communists were concerned that Trotsky would move away from Lenin's policies and his failure to attend the funeral enhanced these fears. Meanwhile, as Trotsky seemingly moved away from Lenin, Stalin was busy promoting himself as Lenin's chosen heir and as the stable choice for election. Trotsky's loyalty to the Communists was also in doubt as he had only joined the party in 1917, while Lenin had been a loyal member for over twenty years. Although Trotsky was an excellent orator and had orchestrated victory in the civil war he had many negative personality points that meant he was greatly disliked. ...read more.

Conclusion

The right wing of the party wanted to move more slowly towards Communism and supported the NEP as a means of moving forwards. Stalin used his great astuteness to play off one faction of the party against another. This is a factor that would have been irrelevant if Stalin's great slyness had not enabled him to exploit this party divide to his advantage; even without this divide, given other factors, Stalin would probably have won anyway. All these factors interrelated to enable Stalin to become undisputed leader of Russia in 1929. His position as General Secretary was his power base and enabled him to pack the party with his supporters. His shrewdness and tactics allowed him to get rid of his opposition and also allowed him to cause fighting within the party to his advantage, his dull exterior meaning that while doing these things he was never seen as being a threat to anyone else. Stalin was supported as the more middle-of-the-road Communist, in comparison to Trotsky, and all the above factors worked together to bring about his victory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Horses were confiscated and tractors were not replaced, consequently, much work had to be done by manual labour, mostly women. * By 1945, women made up 80% of the agricultural workforce and worked largely by hand. * Many peasants were not paid and the volume of grain provided for planting fell by 75% from 1940 to 1942.

  2. How did Stalin manage to secure power in Russia by 1929?

    Similarly, Stalin used Lenin's Enrolment Plan to increase his power. The plan, which aimed to increase the number of members, resulted in over 500,000 workers being recruited. Stalin used this to his advantage, as the majority of the new recruits were politically uneducated workers and so Stalin influenced them to gain support by extending his authority within the party.

  1. How effective was Lenin at establishing control in Russia between 1917 and 1924?

    On the 7th November the Bolsheviks captured the Winter Palace and the members of the Provisional Government were arrested, and as the Bolsheviks had virtually no opposition due to the fact there was no authority left, they were soon successful.

  2. How far did Stalin manage to modernize Russia by 1938?

    Party fanatics such as the Twenty-Five Thousanders were placed in charge of collective farms, but as they were not specialized in agricultural methods, they only led to more inefficiency, and wrong moves, making matters worse. An example is how the theories of one "scientist" were applied to farming, but because they were absolutely fantastical, destroyed several crops.

  1. In what ways did the careers of Stalin and Trotsky differ in the years ...

    Stalin now having received a more powerful job was still under Trotsky in the power chain and this still left Stalin jealous. In September, Trotsky was elected as the chairman of the Soviet.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Ideology and opinion in Stalin’s USSR: Stalin’s regime could rely on a certain amount of good will, generated by several factors ï 1. Regime associated itself with the idea of modernisation which was popular with many young people. 2. Soviet propaganda may have been successful in portraying the regime as the guardian of national security and patriotism.

  1. How significant were the personalities of the contenders to succeed Lenin in accounting for ...

    He, from the very beginning was a 'yes man' following Lenin till the very end. However one major strength that Lenin foresaw was Stalin?s ability to challenge his thoughts and ideologies. Stalin from the very beginning has 'a very strong personality' (Lenin)

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    The information we have nowadays about these two figures isn�t enogh to determine who was the most important of the two, but having the information we have previously seen, I will try to create a fair judgement of both Lenin and Stalin.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work