• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Stalin manage to secure power in Russia by 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did Stalin manage to secure power in Russia by 1929? Following Lenin's death in 1924, there was a feeling of confusion as to who would lead Russia. Lenin gave no indication as to who should lead after his death. Instead, a triumvirate, or collective leadership, emerged between Stalin, Kamenev and Zinoviev. During Lenin's illness and directly afterwards, the collective leadership was viewed as a practical arrangement and no single leader was sought, nor was there a layout for the election of a new leader. Using this as a foundation to gain power within the Communist Party and the government, Stalin commenced his scheme to gain power over Russia. One of the most significant factors was Stalin's position and role within the Communist Party. His role as General Secretary was extremely advantageous to him. It gave him an insight into all areas of the Party giving him access to thousands of personal files about Communist Party members. He was in a position to delegate key posts to his supporters to gain allies through his exploits of power. This gave him an edge over his opponents and stressed his potential. Even Lenin was aware of Stalin's potential. In his last testament, Lenin said of Stalin: "Comrade Stalin, having become General Secretary, has concentrated enormous power in his hands: and I am not sure that he always knows how to use that power with sufficient caution." This gives an important insight into Stalin's capacity and will to become leader of the Soviet Union. ...read more.

Middle

By suggesting an end to one of Lenin's policies, Stalin accused Trotsky of going against Lenin. [ik1]It also helped to remove Zinoviev and Kamenev. Having become increasingly cautious of Stalin, they had gone over to Trotsky's side and so Stalin was able to tarnish their reputation by raising doubt over their intentions. Once the left wing opposition had been removed, Stalin turned to the right wing opposition. Once again, the NEP was the defining issue, but this time, Stalin did a u-turn in his political beliefs. The majority of the right supported NEP, but Stalin now decided that NEP was inappropriate. He claimed that because of the Kulaks, the NEP had become unsuccessful and should therefore go. This is because Stalin felt that the Kulaks were putting their individual welfare before those of Russia on a whole, and that they supported Capitalism. The right wing, such as Bukharin, was accused of wanting to "increase the power of Kulaks...and hence frustrate the introduction of Socialism in the countryside." (H. Shukman, 1999). In this way, Stalin had used the NEP debates to isolate his main competitors for power within the Communist Party. The conflicts over NEP were broadened because of the different viewpoints towards it. During the power struggle between Trotsky and Stalin, the ideological rift between the two began to deepen as their opposing views came into conflict. Theoretically, Trotsky's call for "Permanent Revolution" seemed ideal. It complied with Marx's theory of international and world revolution as a means of spreading communism, but in reality it was unfeasible. ...read more.

Conclusion

The ideological view credits Stalin's rise as being for practical and ideological incentives and not personal ambition. Historians such as E.H. Carr believe this was the primary reason for Stalin's yearn for power. Historians who accept this approach underline that the struggle between Stalin and Trotsky was caused by conflicts over the future direction of the revolution. According to C. Ward, "the general secretary [Stalin] was not so much an opportunist as a practical politician balancing between extremes." For instance, they believe that Stalin's attack on Trotsky's belief of "Permanent Revolution" could be seen merely as the actions of a practical politician who was concerned about the possibility of the Soviet Union becoming involved in a war it was ill equipped to fight, rather than that of a manipulative member of government. Though his personality could be seen as the most significant factor, other circumstances aided his rise to power. Through a combination of his determination and ruthlessness, his attacks on the opposition's flaws, he was able to take advantage of his position the Communist Party. The economic and political confusion left by Lenin's death and the civil war allowed him to gain support in the Politburo and Central committee. Taken into consideration with his appealing ideology, this gave him an edge over his opponents. Therefore, by 1929, Stalin was able to convince the Communist Party that he was the appropriate figure to take control of Russia. As pointed out a fellow Party member, "he was a man whose aim was very clear...he accomplished it in the most convincing way...and he allowed nothing to get in his way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    Centre was trying desperately to get local parties and members to follow the Party line. * Perhaps Totalitarianism isn't an appropriate term to describe Stalin's Russia after all. The Terror * The Terror is used to describe a whole series of events in Russia from 1928 to 1938.

  2. Why did Stalin win the struggle for power in 1923 – 9?

    authority in his hands and I am not sure whether he will always be capable of using that authority with sufficient caution. Comrade Trotsky, on the other hand, is distinguished not only by his outstanding ability. He is personally probably the most capable man in the present Central Committee, but

  1. How far were the socio-economic policies of Stalin aimed towards the modernisation of Soviet ...

    He did this also at a remarkable time, a time when it is of vital importance that he was to have The Red Army at full strength. Stalin decreased national security by destroying vital members of not only The Red Army but the NKVD aswell.

  2. Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

    He made a number of grave mistakes which ultimately led to Stalin's rise to power. Prior to his death, Lenin had grown increasingly worried about the power that Stalin was gaining and wrote in his testament about him "not being able to use power with sufficient caution."

  1. Explain why Stalin came to power by 1929

    Stalin's ruthless nature allowed him to be able to drop a policy and not get too committed towards his ideas, he was able to focus more on his opponents. Another main reason that Stalin was able to come to power by 1929 was the weaknesses of his political opponents, especially Trotsky.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Up to 23,000 officers were shot or dismissed. The majority of those purged from the army were not killed. The purge of the military was regarded as very significant. Marshall Tukhachevsky had been an innovative general who thought carefully about improving military tactics ï he and other leading generals were dismissed, convicted of treason and shot in 1937.

  1. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    have to adopt the policies he once opposed- rapid industrialisation and agricultural collectivisation. His swing to the left is therefore a prime reason as to why the final contender was defeated. Stalin knew that with Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev removed, the supporters of the left wing had no leader and

  2. Why was Stalin able to come to power by 1929?

    Trotsky also suggested that Russians should keep fighting a permanent revolution (also known as Internationalism) until world communism had been achieved. Many believed this was this was unpractical and realised that Russia was far too weak to challenge capitalists worldwide.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work