• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Stalin manage to secure power in Russia by 1929?

Extracts from this document...


How did Stalin manage to secure power in Russia by 1929? Following Lenin's death in 1924, there was a feeling of confusion as to who would lead Russia. Lenin gave no indication as to who should lead after his death. Instead, a triumvirate, or collective leadership, emerged between Stalin, Kamenev and Zinoviev. During Lenin's illness and directly afterwards, the collective leadership was viewed as a practical arrangement and no single leader was sought, nor was there a layout for the election of a new leader. Using this as a foundation to gain power within the Communist Party and the government, Stalin commenced his scheme to gain power over Russia. One of the most significant factors was Stalin's position and role within the Communist Party. His role as General Secretary was extremely advantageous to him. It gave him an insight into all areas of the Party giving him access to thousands of personal files about Communist Party members. He was in a position to delegate key posts to his supporters to gain allies through his exploits of power. This gave him an edge over his opponents and stressed his potential. Even Lenin was aware of Stalin's potential. In his last testament, Lenin said of Stalin: "Comrade Stalin, having become General Secretary, has concentrated enormous power in his hands: and I am not sure that he always knows how to use that power with sufficient caution." This gives an important insight into Stalin's capacity and will to become leader of the Soviet Union. ...read more.


By suggesting an end to one of Lenin's policies, Stalin accused Trotsky of going against Lenin. [ik1]It also helped to remove Zinoviev and Kamenev. Having become increasingly cautious of Stalin, they had gone over to Trotsky's side and so Stalin was able to tarnish their reputation by raising doubt over their intentions. Once the left wing opposition had been removed, Stalin turned to the right wing opposition. Once again, the NEP was the defining issue, but this time, Stalin did a u-turn in his political beliefs. The majority of the right supported NEP, but Stalin now decided that NEP was inappropriate. He claimed that because of the Kulaks, the NEP had become unsuccessful and should therefore go. This is because Stalin felt that the Kulaks were putting their individual welfare before those of Russia on a whole, and that they supported Capitalism. The right wing, such as Bukharin, was accused of wanting to "increase the power of Kulaks...and hence frustrate the introduction of Socialism in the countryside." (H. Shukman, 1999). In this way, Stalin had used the NEP debates to isolate his main competitors for power within the Communist Party. The conflicts over NEP were broadened because of the different viewpoints towards it. During the power struggle between Trotsky and Stalin, the ideological rift between the two began to deepen as their opposing views came into conflict. Theoretically, Trotsky's call for "Permanent Revolution" seemed ideal. It complied with Marx's theory of international and world revolution as a means of spreading communism, but in reality it was unfeasible. ...read more.


The ideological view credits Stalin's rise as being for practical and ideological incentives and not personal ambition. Historians such as E.H. Carr believe this was the primary reason for Stalin's yearn for power. Historians who accept this approach underline that the struggle between Stalin and Trotsky was caused by conflicts over the future direction of the revolution. According to C. Ward, "the general secretary [Stalin] was not so much an opportunist as a practical politician balancing between extremes." For instance, they believe that Stalin's attack on Trotsky's belief of "Permanent Revolution" could be seen merely as the actions of a practical politician who was concerned about the possibility of the Soviet Union becoming involved in a war it was ill equipped to fight, rather than that of a manipulative member of government. Though his personality could be seen as the most significant factor, other circumstances aided his rise to power. Through a combination of his determination and ruthlessness, his attacks on the opposition's flaws, he was able to take advantage of his position the Communist Party. The economic and political confusion left by Lenin's death and the civil war allowed him to gain support in the Politburo and Central committee. Taken into consideration with his appealing ideology, this gave him an edge over his opponents. Therefore, by 1929, Stalin was able to convince the Communist Party that he was the appropriate figure to take control of Russia. As pointed out a fellow Party member, "he was a man whose aim was very clear...he accomplished it in the most convincing way...and he allowed nothing to get in his way. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * No one knows quite how many people died in the Purges; but Stalin once told Churchill that collectivisation alone cost 10 million lives. * Millions were either deprived of Party membership, arrested with or without trial, sent to the Gulags or shot.

  2. Why did Stalin rather than Trotsky emerge as the leader of the Soviet Union ...

    he was no good at political deception and making alliances and trade-offs. Instead he preferred to make his case public before the party congress. This proves Trotsky was oblivious of the manipulative character of Stalin, and the fact power lay with Stalin and the other party leaders rather than the party congress.

  1. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin Both Vladimir Lenin and Joseph ...

    These are the main points of Lenin' speech: ? There should be no co-operation with the Provisional government ? The war should be ended immediately ? The land should be given to the peasants ? The Soviets should take power Russia and the USSR - Fiehn Once Lenin had been made Leader he setup Sovnarkom which was a different government.

  2. To what extent was equality achieved under Stalin?

    of 1932-35, where twenty percent of the party was expelled non-violently after collectivisation, a combination of show trials, and the Yehovshchina; a period of mass terror from 1937 to 1938. The Purges aimed 'to ensure iron proletarian discipline' and cleanse 'the party's ranks of all unreliable, unstable and hanger-on elements.'49

  1. Why did Stalin win the struggle to power?

    He made a number of grave mistakes which ultimately led to Stalin's rise to power. Prior to his death, Lenin had grown increasingly worried about the power that Stalin was gaining and wrote in his testament about him "not being able to use power with sufficient caution."

  2. How far did Stalin manage to modernize Russia by 1938?

    Party fanatics such as the Twenty-Five Thousanders were placed in charge of collective farms, but as they were not specialized in agricultural methods, they only led to more inefficiency, and wrong moves, making matters worse. An example is how the theories of one "scientist" were applied to farming, but because they were absolutely fantastical, destroyed several crops.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Lenin argued forcefully and effectively for insurrection, pursuing relentlessly the line he had argued in his letters from Finland. Now is the time, he declared, for insurrection. If we do not strike now our chance will be lost, perhaps forever.

  2. Why did Stalin emerge as leader of Soviet Russia?

    He had managed to take down three of the possible contenders, and was now left to defeat Bukharin- something he had obviously planned from the start. Due to the fact the NEP began to fail, Stalin came to the realisation that if he wanted to emerge as leader, he would

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work