• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Stalin Rather Than His Rivals Manage To Secure Power In 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did Stalin Rather Than His Rivals Manage To Secure Power In 1929? In 1924, Russia was in a great state of confusion with the eventual demise of Lenin. A sudden sense of void was felt at the time, a vast following was then swiftly formed straight after, and Lenin was now presented as a "cult hero". This iconic status was actually created partly by Stalin himself. He was able to build this fantastic atmosphere around Lenin's death, using Lenin's name to move forward in the party. Stalin was already ranked with potential of becoming a powerful politician. Stalin was part of the collective leadership, the Triumvirate that consisted of Zinoviev, Kamenev and Stalin himself. The Triumvirate had its differences between them, but were united with their hostility towards Trotsky. "On the face of it Trotsky was in a strong position. One of his supporters said to him that, having Lenin's explicit support, he was now sure to have a preponderant role. Trotsky answered that, on the contrary, it would unite all his rivals against him". (Stalin breaker of nations, Robert Conquest) ...read more.

Middle

Just as Stalin tried to portray himself as the heir to Lenin as leader, he similarly tried to elevate himself as the only orthodox Leninist when it came to political debates. When Lenin introduced the NEP in 1922, it was never to last. Lenin however was very unclear about an actual date it would all end. Proposed as a financial incentive to try boosting the economy in Russia, it was only temporary as it was an aspect of capitalism. It was never a policy to be retained. "Lenin had uttered contradictorily remarks about the NEP, not making it clear whether it was only meant to provide breathing space or whether it would continue for a long time. In any case the NEP became both impractical and politically unacceptable." (Stalin, Harold Shukman) The fact no date was mentioned, it added incredibly to the ambiguity of the situation where Stalin took full advantage. The NEP, created a huge conflict between the Left and Right. Bukharin (Right) believed the NEP should remain, as it was a runaway success, as it created jobs, and economic stability. Trotsky who represented the Left wanted it to end as soon as possible, he was not against the policy as it already had been a success it should now end. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is where Stalin's working class background helped Stalin gain almost absolute support from the party. "Most of them came like Stalin himself, from very humble back grounds and have received little formal education. Mistrusting intellectuals such as Trotsky, they preferred to place their trust in Stalin's wisdom... when it came to matters of ideology."(Orlando Figes, A People's Tragedy, The Russian Revolution 1891 -1924) Stalin succeeded in the Ideological debate, this could be seen as both Stalin's strength as a politician or even challenge the whole ideal of Permanent revolution. Stalin won the ideological debate claiming he believed in the concept of "Socialism in one country" beyond doubt. Fitzpatrick confirms this as she states "Stalin, by contrast, took the position that was simultaneously patriotic and practical: the Soviet Union had no desire to beg favours from the Capitalist West." The historian Brezezinski however contradicts this view, he is not concerned about the figures involved, he believes it was the whole outlook of permanent revolution which was flawed from the very beginning, "Trotsky offended the instinct for self-preservation of the newly entrenched party bureaucrats, who were not prepared to risk all on the altar of a premature world revolution." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    His loyalty was, moreover, to Lenin and not to the abstract entity known as the Bolshevik Party. Had Lenin not returned from Zurich and had Stalin, Kamenev and Muranov kept the party on its conciliationist path, there is an excellent chance that Sverdlov would have directed his formidable talents towards some other internationalist and pro-Soviet organization.

  2. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    After a number of attempts on his life, Alexander II was assassinated in 1881. Following the assassination of his father, Alexander III was determined to wage war against all political opponents. He was helped by the fact that most ordinary Russians shared his feelings and turned against revolutionary groups.

  1. .Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin. Lenin and Stalin had many ...

    is highly possible that that the Bolshevik party would not have won the revolution, and the subsequent Communist Soviet Union may not have been established. Similarly, his brilliant leadership qualities and determination, and ruthlessness (e.g. "War Communism"), allowed him and Bolsheviks to preserve their authority and eventually win the Civil War.

  2. Compare the Characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin

    Not only did he murder more people than any of the others, but lived to be seventy-three, dying in 1953. By Lauren Simpson Who do you think had more impact in Russian history, Lenin or Stalin? After studying the life, beliefs and impact of Lenin and Stalin I have come

  1. How did Stalin Rise to Power between 1922 – 1929?

    Shukhanov described Stalin on the ExCom as "a grey blur which flickered obscurely and left no trace." 4 Shukhanov, being a member of the ExCom is a primary eyewtiness and knew Stalin very well. Therefore to a certain extent this source holds some truth.

  2. Why was Stalin able to come to power by 1929?

    The new members were also predominantly young, very easy to control and to persuade. The new recruits were ?ready enough to accept what they were told? (A.Bullock) This putting him at a colossal political advantage over his peers in the Politburo as he was able to gain valuable votes, This

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    Terror was an integral part of the communist system. The 1917 Revolution and the Civil War were both born and maintained in terror. Stalin simply applied terror more ruthlessly and on a larger scale. 3. Terror was necessary in order to complete the economic change taking place from the late-1929s.

  2. Compare the characters and beliefs of Lenin and Stalin.

    he would in return blame the workers.The labour camps knwn as Gulags, were at the centre of Stalin�s programme of terror. People feared being sent to them almost as much as being shot. Few survived the harsh conditions there which meant distroyed families.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work