• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Stalin rise from a position of relative insecurity to a position of absolute power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did Stalin rise from a position of relative insecurity to a position of absolute power? Stalin was a man who was very talented in the art of manipulating large numbers of people. He used his calculative cunningness in order to gain absolute influence over the people of Russia. He used propaganda, censorship and fear in order to manipulate the Russian people into how he wanted them to be. Even before Hitler consolidated his control over Germany in the early 1930s, another European dictator had already come to power in Russia. His name was Joseph V. Djugashvili, who became popularly known as Joseph Stalin (1879-1953), a name which translates as "made of steel." Having worked his way to the top through the early years of the Communist Revolution of 1917, Stalin fought for control of the revolution after Lenin's death in 1924. His main rival was another high Communist Party official, Leon Trotsky. By 1926, Stalin had driven Trotsky from his position as a Communist Party official. In 1929, Stalin ordered Trotsky to leave Russia altogether. As Stalin prepared to take complete control of the further direction of the Russian Revolution, he moved the Soviet people into an era noted for abuse, absolute government control, and political murder. ...read more.

Middle

From Grolier Online: Stalin rose to power because he embodied, perhaps more than any of his old colleagues, a new spirit. His colleagues, most notably the brilliant, individualistic Trotsky, who had thrived during the days of storm and stress, were unfitted for the office politics, the patient calculation, and the compromise required to operate a growing bureaucratic regime. Stalin, though unimpressive physically and a man of restless, emotional, vain, cynical, and often vindictive temperament, had internalized so profoundly the role of administrator that he projected everywhere in public (in imitation of Lenin) a humble air, simple dress, personal asceticism, calmness, efficiency, and fatherliness--qualities that appealed to his colleagues, to the public, and, perhaps most important of all, to the new generation of party functionaries of humble origin flooding the party in the 1920's. Stalin was also careful to back the most popular solutions to the many problems hotly debated in the 1920's, including Lenin's principles of one-party government and internal party unity, the restoration of normal diplomatic relations, and moderate policies for the development of Soviet industry and agriculture. His theory of "socialism in one country", which asserted the possibility of building a complete Communist system in one country, contradicted traditional Marxist internationalism. ...read more.

Conclusion

In the face of the growing threats from Nazi Germany and Japan, Stalin reverted increasingly to traditional forms of foreign policy, seeking diplomatic alliances with the European powers. Finally, in August 1939, he concluded a bilateral nonaggression treaty with Hitler Although Hitler and Stalin hated each other, the two leaders were similar in many ways. Hitler and Stalin each rose to the highest position attainable in their respective countries, and there were three main reasons that they were able to do this. Both men were skilled users of propaganda, each was amoral, and they both had the ambition to make their countries powerful in the world. Since each was a skilled user of propaganda, they could use their words to twist and manipulate the minds of people into believing that what they were saying was the absolute truth. Using this power, they would get people to do anything for them, which proves their amorality. Since their countries were still trying to recover from World War I, they desired to restore the power back in to their countries. These three reasons will prove that Hitler and Stalin were similar in many ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. This essay will examine the rise of anti-Semitism from ancient times to the Holocaust ...

    The war had had a huge impact on Hitler. He had gone into the war as an aimless failed artist and emerged the other side as a determined man with a sense of purpose. Hitler gained respect and credibility in right wing circles as he had fought bravely during the war, earning the Iron Cross.

  2. History - Mussolini's Rise to Power

    The Blackshirts' main strategy involved using 'piazza politics', taking over streets and squares in towns to show their intent in a flamboyant and popular manner. This was an optimal contrast to the leftist strategies of striking and occupying factories, which substantially limited their target audience.

  1. Soviet State

    Before 1934, the police had only limited powers of arrest and sentence. In law, at least, the secret police could not yet carry out death sentences. With the murder of Kirov on 1 December 1934, the position of the secret police changed radically.

  2. How successful was Louis of imposing absolute control on government in the provinces?

    They traditionally were responsible for raising money through tax collection in the provinces and day to day decision making. Louis tried imposing his absolute control over them too. He made sure taxes were collected properly and to his standards. He needed the right amount of money for him to spend

  1. Can Napoleon's rise to power merely be attributed to his control of the government?'

    leader if they seized the opportunity and that is exactly what Napoleon did. This is one of the first clear factors which show that Napoleon's rise to power cannot merely be attributed to his control of the army. It was during the Revolution that Napoleon transformed himself into a Jacobin

  2. Evaluate historical comparisons of Hitler and Stalin and their regimes

    Both men chose extreme politics as they believed this was the future for their country. Their personalities were similar in some sense. Bullock described how neither man was particularly memorable and neither had a strong character that made people like them before they came to power, "to anyone who came

  1. Assess the relative importance of the reasons why the July 1944 Bomb Plot to ...

    Essentially Goebells and the intervention of one insignificant young officer, Major Ernst Remer, were partly responsible for the suppression of the army coup?? The army coup was essentially squashed by a clever stroke by Goebbels and the intervention of one insignificant young officer, Major Ernst Remer.

  2. How did Joseph Stalin rise to power?

    This meant he got away with forming a faction. Factions were banned in the Bolshevik party because it was thought that they would lead to splits within the party, this theory was correct. This faction led to Zinoviev and Kamenev being dismissed from the party, however Stalin got away with it because of the power he had.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work