• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the aims and methods of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X differ?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Martin Luther King, Jr and Malcolm X had mostly the same aim - ending Black discrimination. For the former it meant integrating with Whites and learning to live among them, for the latter it meant separation, Black Pride and physical fight for their rights. The differences in their views can be derived from their backgrounds. King- middle class Christian from the South was striving for acceptance for Blacks with his strictly non-violent approach. His active non-violent resistance was exercised through legal means, protests and boycotts. One of the protests initiated by NAACP and then led by King was Montgomery Bus Boycott in which his non-violent policy was applied. ...read more.


A remarkable thing about King is his engagement in the protests. He lead many of them: Montgomery Bus Boycott, Birmingham Campaign, March on Washington and was always on the front line facing the civil right? opponents. Whereas Malcolm was born a poor Northerner and later became a muslim. He contributed to the Civil Rights movement through his speeches on why Blacks should be proud of their identity and on physical fight for civil rights, which inspired lots of frustrated Blacks. Malcolm?s teachings gave people an alternative to King, whose non-violent methods Malcolm despised and who thought that the turning the other cheek was inferior and instead advertised defending themselves ?by all means necessary?. ...read more.


The approaches of these two civil rights activists differed greatly but they had one aim - equality to Blacks. Both wanted this, though King wanted integration and Malcolm black pride in separation. All in all, they were similar in their pursuit of improvement for blacks but were two extremes of the civil rights movement. It can be argued that Malcolm X wanted the same America as King and all his speeches of hatred had only one aim - making Whites more inclined to accept King?s requests. He said in Washington ?I?m here to remind the white man what is the alternative to King?. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    To what extent were Malcolm X and the subsequent Black Power Movement the 'Evil ...

    4 star(s)

    "White self-interest ensured poor prospects for better education and housing for ghetto blacks."45 Whites wanted to keep African Americans separate in order to keep house prices up and make sure black children could not hold back white children in education.

  2. Short term impact of Malcolm X

    message Martin Luther King "if a man hasn't found something he will die for, he isn't fit to live"21. On the other hand, messages Malcolm preached "alive, he made the leaders of the uncomfortable and he was a genuine danger to the cause of radical comity"22, yet once dead "Malcolm's

  1. Compare the aims, methods and achievements of MLK and Malcolm X. Which man do ...

    to counter white supremacy,' better known as Black Power. X advocated violence, and I would suggest that this was to result in a short term failure for X. This is because X's white rivals, segregationalists and racists, would now find a legitimate excuse to be opposed to black people- violence reminiscent of a modern day terrorist group.

  2. What in your view was the short term significance of Malcolm X?

    He became a black icon and role model for black youth. This source is reliable in saying this due to the fact that it is secondary and written to educate. It is unlikely that the source which comprises part of a school text book would be giving irrelevant or unreliable data.

  1. Linguistic Study - Linguistic Analysis of Martin Luther King's 'I Have a Dream', and ...

    As I will only be able to make transcripts of King's speech, I will also be able to study these phonological and paralinguistic features in his speech: * Rhythm of speech * Rhyme * Stress on certain words * Facial expressions * Accents * Alliteration * Repetition * Body/hand movement

  2. Martin Luther King. Martin was one of Americas greatest civil rights activists, shaping ...

    die by the sword.? This could be interpreted as using violence would result in receiving violence in return. One of King?s non-violence principles was ?Attack forces of evil, not persons doing evil,? which was based on one of Gandhi?s sayings: ?Hate the sin, love the sinner.? Both mean the same thing; hate the action, not the person doing it.

  1. What was the short term impact of the Montgomery Bus Boycott 1955-1957?

    have also discouraged the whites from riding the buses too due to the increased fare, suggesting that the bankruptcy may be a reason for why there was not much backlash from the white community after the desegregation laws in buses were passed in Alabama, which shows how the Bus Boycott did not really impact the Civil Rights movement.

  2. What was the short term significance of Malcolm X?

    Also contextualizing Malcolm's opinion is important because during the sixties gaining legal rights through peaceful protest alone was a slow process and had a limited impact. Despite these qualities raising black consciousness had a far more positive impact than it did negative.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work