How did the aims and methods of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X differ?
Martin Luther King, Jr and Malcolm X had mostly the same aim - ending Black discrimination. For the former it meant integrating with Whites and learning to live among them, for the latter it meant separation, Black Pride and physical fight for their rights.
The differences in their views can be derived from their backgrounds. King- middle class Christian from the South was striving for acceptance for Blacks with his strictly non-violent approach. His active non-violent resistance was exercised through legal means, protests and boycotts. One of the protests initiated by NAACP and then led by King was Montgomery Bus Boycott in which his non-violent policy was applied. All Blacks from Montgomery stopped using busses and walked to their workplaces instead. This had a huge economical impact on bus companies and downtown businesses and resulted in busses being desegregated and other civil rights protests spreading across the South. King was also seeking media attention and provoked violence so that people from more stable places could see the treatment Blacks received and sympathize with them. A remarkable thing about King is his engagement in the protests. He lead many of them: Montgomery Bus Boycott, Birmingham Campaign, March on Washington and was always on the front line facing the civil right’ opponents.