• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did the League of Nations hope to prevent future wars between nations

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q5-Study the extract, and then answer the questions which follow Article 16: Should any member of the League resort to war, it shall be regarded as having committed an act of war against all other members of the League, and this will end immediately all trade and financial relations with that member. From the Covenant of the League of Nations. (a) How did the League of Nations hope to prevent future wars between nations? - The League officially began operating in January 1920; their initial steps taken were small-scaled. The first step was to set up a commission to deal with specific problems hoping that it would solve minor issues and disputes between nations. ...read more.

Middle

(b) Why did the League of Nations fail to restrict the aggression of Japan in the 1930s? - When China appealed to the league at first, they were very cautious. Japan was a leading member in the league and needed careful handling. In being cautious, their actions were delayed greatly. After a full year of the League's hesitant contemplation of the issue, they had finally presented their report. The Judgment was that Japan had acted unlawfully, and that Manchuria should be returned to the Chinese. However, in 1933 instead of withdrawing from Manchuria, the Japanese announced that they intended to invade more of China. They still argued that this was necessary in self-defense. ...read more.

Conclusion

There was no outlook in Britain and France risking their armies or navies in a war with Japan. Only the USA and USSR had the resources to remove the Japanese from Manchuria by force and they were not even in the League. (c) How far was the League of Nations a failure? Explain your answer. - Successes of the League of Nations, were all little, but went a long way. If you think about it, the league did not really have much power in its hands due to the lack of powerful countries, etc. So they were only really capable of making minor-scaled adjustments (such as Vilna in 1920) but they had a great impact, since a war could have began from such minor troubles. In 1920, the league of Nations ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why Did The League of Nations Fail To Keep Peace In The 1930s?

    The League took a year to make a decision on the crisis and in the end decided that Japan was the aggressor and "told them off". Japan took no notice of this and resigned from the League. Economic sanctions never took place as Britain and France thought that Japan was

  2. How Successful Was the League of Nations In the 1920’S?

    Lithuania appealed for help from the league. The league told the Poles to get out but they did not shift. When the League saw they weren't getting anywhere with talking they told Britain and France to go and get them out.

  1. The league of nations - How successful was The League in the 1920's?

    Even in areas where it could not remove social injustice the L.O.N kept careful records of what was going on and provided information an problems such as drug trafficking, prostitution and slavery. The League Of Nations was much more successful in this aim because the measures taken posed no threat

  2. United Nations: The Wounded Dove

    a democratic government, all countries would engage in trade freely with one another, all countries would share in world prosperity, and all counties would seek to reduce their weaponry" (The UN - HLS). The 'Big five' though drew up their plans for the international organization, they proposed the following ideas;

  1. Did The League of Nations Have any chance of long Term Success?

    Therefore, it could not carry out any threats and any country defying its authority would have been very aware of this weakness. The only two countries in the League that could have provided any military might were Britain and France and both had been severely depleted strength-wise in World War

  2. Discussing Japan.

    This is why they are having to develop earthquake proof buildings and bridges to stop the complete devastation of these structures in such severe conditions. But the Japanese believe that the storms are gifts from god and they also believe that they are good for and help them.

  1. How Successful Was the League in The 1920's and 1930's? The League of ...

    Because these three major countries were excluded from the League, they were free to trade with those who had trade bans upon them. The Assembly had more problems. The Assembly was made up of 45 countries, and for world peace, all the countries should have been included, but they weren't.

  2. Arab-Israeli Wars.

    This war showed Israel's impressive military capability,it contributed to the consolidation of its regional and international standing.But Nasser did not take any lessons,he started another war.He rested on the advantage of an Egyptian and arab militay build up,a sufficiant measuere of Arab cooperation to permit the formation of a single arab around Israel and Israel's international isolation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work