• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How did Wolsey managed to stay in power for so long?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How did Wolsey managed to stay in power for so long Wolsey managed to stay in power so long for several reasons, all of which stem from one thing, his ability to keep Henry VIII content and happy. He came to power by pleasing Henry's foreign policy aims, coordinating an attack on France. He fell from power when he was finally unable to please Henry's aims, and get him his divorce. Through out his time as Henry's "right hand man" he was able to make possible and practical Henry's desires. Where Wolsey was most successful was in foreign policy. At the time England was a comparatively small player in the "big game" of Europe, but Wolsey was able to make up for the shortcomings of England through planning, foresight, diplomacy and hard work. ...read more.

Middle

However England at the time didn't have the men or the resources to become a great military power in Europe, which Wolsey realised, so in order for England to be great she had to be taken down a different root. In 1518, the Treaty of London was this new root; it allowed England and therefore Henry to appear as the arbitrator of Europe. The Treaty of London was a "Universal Peace" that all the big powers and many of the small signed. It was Wolsey who came up with the idea (although the original had been the popes) and Wolsey who brought it to fruition, the "glory" that this put on Henry was immense, which pleased him greatly. ...read more.

Conclusion

These all show how accomplished Wolsey was at planning and organisation but most importantly how good he was at keeping Henry happy, even if there motives clashed, Wolsey was a humanist, but he organised many attacks on foreign powers to keep his masters happy. Another important role of Wolsey's was law and order, as Lord Chancellor he was the highest legal person in the country. One of Henry's major domestic concerns was keeping the Nobles in check, as his father had usurped the throne the Tudor dynasty was relatively new, and the state had no standing army where as the noble all had there own, this all meant that the nobles were potentially dangerous to Henry. Wolsey was able to use his legal power to curtail the Nobility, he did this through several methods, his first was the idea of "impartial justice" implemented under Wolsey ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The author shows some understanding of Wolsey's role in foreign negotiations and in ensuring loyalty to the King but the examination is very brief and other points could have been considered, particularly the argument that Henry disliked the day-to-day work associated with being King so looked to Wolsey to relieve the burden.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 16/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Free essay

    To what extent did Henry VII reduce the power of the nobility

    4 star(s)

    Although he kept the select few in his court as means of keeping his friends close but his "enemies closer" as said by Sun Tzu, this was few and far between. The main result whether intentional or not was that Henry VII's appointing the peerage in his court meant they

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was Wolsey in his Domestic Administration 1515-29?

    4 star(s)

    Wolsey was concerned about the influence of the minions in Henry's court and the privy chamber and the influence they were having upon Henry. The Royal Court was mobile and Wolsey mainly was situated in 'York Place' and otherwise was tied up with work.

  1. What were the aims of English Foreign Policy 1529-1558?

    However, the break can be seen as unsuccessful as it paved the way for many other religious problems and disputes which were to come after Henry's death. The marriage alliance with Cleves cannot really be seen as a success. Although Henry did eventually marry Anne of Cleves, by this time

  2. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    This was met with discontent in some parts of the kingdom and this resulted in 15,000 Cornish rebels marching on London before being defeated on 17 June 1497. Despite this, it showed that people weren't happy with the methods of raising money from Henry's government.

  1. Charles V - An Evaluation Of Success And Failures.

    The General Council at Trent which first met in 1545 was a disappointment for Charles because it was not seeking a compromise solution to the Protestant problem but a restatement of Catholic faith in opposition to Protestantism. Charles attempted to solve the German problem himself in the Augsburg interim but

  2. How and why did Lord Liverpool survive the Radical Challenges of 1812 ...

    But huge number took to streets in protest causing the coffin to be taken through the main streets of London. I showed how unpopular George IV and Lord Liverpool was but it was the last big protest of the time period because during the 1820's the economy revives and the radical threat dies down.

  1. Economic and social issues were the main cause of Tudor Rebellion in Tudor England. ...

    There are other rebellions that occurred on the last years of the Tudors. Under Elizabeth?s reign, two factional rebellions took place. The revolt of the Northern Earls was caused by the gentry: Northumberland and Cumberland against William Cecil. In the same way, Pilgrimage of Grace had a subsidiary cause of faction.

  2. What was the impact of the Poor Law Amendment Act on the relief of ...

    As Digby (1982) confirmed, 'the cruelty of the workhouse did not reside in its material deprivation but in its psychological harshness" (Ch. P. 17). Although the workhouses were designed to deter entry, there were some clear benefits of being in a workhouse.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work