• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does Shakespeare present Henry (and, by extension, England) in this scene? Refer in your answer to Shakespeare's language, stagecraft and sense of audience, as well as the two-filmed versions you have seen.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Act 2, Scene 2 How does Shakespeare present Henry (and, by extension, England) in this scene? Refer in your answer to Shakespeare's language, stagecraft and sense of audience, as well as the two-filmed versions you have seen. Shakespeare presents Henry using a variety of language and stagecraft, in Act two, scene two, Shakespeare shows how Henry has a bad temper, and can go off into towering rages. First comes to the unmasking of the conspirators Cambridge, Scroop and Gray. Shakespeare uses a lot of exquisite dramatic art and a sense of the effect of irony. He makes Henry only seem to be concerned for the good of his kingdom. ...read more.

Middle

"Wouldst thou have practiced on me for my use?" This makes a difference in the tone of voice, and also in its structure, otherwise, all Henry would be doing is making statements. He also uses a pun during the first part of the speech, when addressing Cambridge. "This man, for a few light crowns hath lightly conspired...". Shakespeare used a pun for a slight contrast in the atmosphere, otherwise everything in his speech would be is very serious. Henry also uses personification: "Treason and murder ever kept together, as two yoke-devils sworn to each other's purpose..." This technique is used as Henry can only imagine Scroop had been possessed, and not that he did this by his own choice. ...read more.

Conclusion

The subject was felt unsuitable, the whole mood of the wartime was paranoid about the possibility of traitors, and so this was cut the film. This version looked more like a fairy tale, there was the same fine weather giving it a positive, happy feel with no sign of violence at all. In the beginning of this scene it showed a Bishop blessing Henry, which showed that god, was believed to be on his side. The Branagh version does not cut out this scene, it was made to be very dramatic with signs of violence as it is part of the lifestyle of this film. The king treats the traitors very harshly, especially to Scroop as he was one of the king's closest friends. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    The boy overall gives a positive impression of Henry, by deciding to follow him and leaving Nym, Bardolph and Pistol as they are no examples of men. The boy reflects the innocence of a child, and how Henry has influenced him, this shows that Henry's speech has worked well as

  2. Crime Scene InvestigationJames Bulger Assignment

    Finally the Walton Railway Tracks, where James body was found and where forensic evidence was obtained. When police were searching the shopping center, they obtained CCTV footage and they asked questions to the victims mother and other witness'. Questions would have been asked by the FAO.

  1. How does Shakespeare present the Character of King Henry V in act 2, scene ...

    knew everything, 'The king hath note of all that they intend by interception, They dream not of'.

  2. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    Henry's deviousness for picking � Beckett caused many church leaders to be anxious and have grave concerns about � Beckett's 'materialistic and cruel military nature and along with a close relationship with Henry II meant � Becket may not be an independent leader for the church'.25 Indeed, Adams26 suggests 'Henry

  1. I am going to compare and contrast two film versions of Henry V.

    actors did not speak as quickly as in the Kenneth Brannagh version so that the audience can understand the film. The actors talk to the live audience in the Lawrence Olivier version, which makes it more obvious that it is a play, whereas the actors talk to the camera in

  2. Report on The linkage of 2010 item and the two historical periods

    them as their only information source, the trust to Wikipedia information is a phenomenon that deserves our attention. We believed that people have the ability to analysis information but not only believing in one source. We choose an internet encyclopedia because the internet will be a very good technology for

  1. Comparing the two film versions of Henry V.

    The acting done in the Brannagh version was realistic. This is because when Henry enters the room every one stops what they are doing and stand up immediately, this is to show respect, as he is the king. The reaction on the people's faces was very shocking as like they were very guilty of doing something.

  2. William Shakespeare.

    This second period also includes the historical King John and a sentimental tragedy, Romeo and Juliet. In the third period, from 1599 to 1608, Shakespeare abandoned romantic comedy (except for Twelfth Night) and English history, working instead on tragedies and on the disturbing 'dark' comedies or 'problem plays' Measure for Measure, All's Well that Ends Well, and Troilus and Cressida.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work