• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective was Lenin at establishing control in Russia between 1917 and 1924?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How effective was Lenin at establishing control in Russia between 1917 and 1924? Lenin and the Bolsheviks seized power from the Provisional Government on the 6th and 7th of November 1917 and from then until 1924 Lenin tried to establish control in Russia by two main methods, force and compromise. The Red Terror is an example of Lenin using force to try and establish control and the NEP is an example of Lenin using compromise. But were these methods actually effective in establishing control of Russia for Lenin? Sometimes Lenin's ways of trying to establish control worked but they were not always totally effective. For example, War Communism, even though it could be argued it got Russia through the war, it resulted in a famine which claimed the lives of 5 million people. Also, even though Lenin had seized power in Petrograd after the November revolution in 1917 it wasn't until after the Civil War that he actually established control of the whole of Russia. Lenin had been a revolutionary since 1887, when his brother was hung for playing a part in a plot to kill Tsar Alexander III, and in 1895 Lenin was arrested and sent to prison, and then later exiled to Siberia. ...read more.

Middle

This method was effective in keeping Lenin and the Communist Party in power but it is also an example of force used by Lenin, Lenin didn't get the power he wanted, so he took it by force. The continuation of the war and the economic crisis were two of the things which were preventing Lenin making progress in 1918, so Lenin was determined to make peace with Germany because he couldn't provide food for the Russians or solve the economic crisis until the war was stopped. Therefore, a peace treaty was signed between Russia and Germany in Brest Litovsk. The Treaty of Brest Litovsk took away 25% of Russia's population, 25% of the railway system, 37% of the grain production and 70% of the industry which caused some Russians to see the treaty as shameful. The Treaty of Brest Litovsk is another example of Lenin using compromise, but another example of him using force to establish control is the "Red Terror". This was when the Cheka and Trotsky's Red Army began a campaign of violence and terror in the hope of crushing any opposition the Communist Party might have. ...read more.

Conclusion

When he did die, Lenin was embalmed and put on display in Red Square until the demise of Communism in 1991. By some people in Russia Lenin was and still is praised as the man who led the Bolshevik Revolution of November 1917 which overthrew the Provisional Government and introduced Communism to Russia. Initially, after the November Revolution, Lenin only had control of Petrograd, but by the time of his death in 1924 he had effectively established control of the whole of Russia, and he did this by using both force and compromise. Lenin was determined to make his Communist ideas work in Russia, he was willing to fight his own people in a Civil War and the NEP shows us he was even willing to compromise with his own ideas to keep power, we know that Lenin truly believed in his views though, as this is shown when he closes Parliament after the Communist Party lose the January elections. Lenin wasn't always effective in his attempts to establish control though and it wasn't until the Civil War was won by the Communists that he had control of all of Russia, but from when he first seized power off the Provisional Government until his death, Lenin kept establishing more and more control and became the first Communist leader in the world. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    They had no loyalty to communism, unlike many industrial workers. B: Transforming the Soviet Union The debate about agricultural change * Some argued that the peasants should be encouraged to grow more and sell more grain by giving them fairer prices.

  2. How did the Bolsheviks consolidate their power: 1917 - 1924?

    response was to print more Roubles which caused prices to rise and inflation soared making the Rouble virtually worthless. The peasants therefore cut production to provide sufficient only for themselves and their families.' Faced with this crisis the Communist Government took complete control over the economy and all major industries and productions.

  1. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    Kerensky was an able politician, but was seriously afraid of a military coup. 10 Days later General Lavr Kornilov was made commander-in-chief of Russia's army. A severe anti-Bolshevik, and politically ambitious man, Kornilov made an already paranoid Kerensky very suspicious.

  2. Revision notes - Russia to 1924

    o Accepted danger fatalistically (didn?t step to change things) o Had little experience of gov. o His wife had immense influence upon him (ie: w/ Rasputin) o Not as firm as Alexander III his father ? increased opposition o This led to the rise of several political movements o The Liberal Movement : a middle class party o The Social Revolutionary Party: (from Land and Liberty Party)

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    All of the examples above show that, far from being the Party of robotized yes-men into which it was later transformed, the Bolshevik Party in 1917 was made up of many dedicated idealists. In the absence of a leader who shared their point of view, these individuals would not have given up the struggle.

  2. Assess the impact of Lenin on Events in Russia between 1917 -1924

    The outcome could of led to the PG becoming stronger and therefore being harder to overthrow but Lenin took the gamble. This shows how much he craved revolution. Another way in which Lenin influenced the revolution was through cunning planning.

  1. Why did the Tsar lose power in 1917?

    Their military programme wouldn?t be ready until 1917. They also weren?t ready economically; Figes said ?war will necessitate expenditures which are beyond Russia?s financial means? stating that Russia couldn?t afford this war. Figes also said ?a European war is mortally dangerous for whomever wins? which is suggesting that even if

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    2,000 1935 193,000 108,900 267,000 1,200 1936 131,100 91,100 274,600 1,100 1937 936,700 779,000 790,600 353,000 1938 638,500 593,300 554,200 328,600 Total for 1937-8 1,575,200 1,372,300 1,344,800 681,600 (Figures in this table not exact, in 100s to make it easier to remember)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work