• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective was Richard III as a king from 1483 - 1485?

Extracts from this document...


How effective was Richard III as a king from 1483 - 1485 At first, to associate Richard II with effectiveness seems an odd thing to do. He is a king with one of the shortest reigns in English history. He came to a violent end and his death was not only the end of the Yorkist dynasty, but also an end to the male line of the Plantagenet dynasty that had been on the throne since Henry VI in 1154. Richard III has always been one of the better-known losers of history, with an appalling reputation for excessive ambition and ruthlessness. He was also in the only king to die in battle with the exception of Harold II (Godwinsson) in 1066. On the other hand, there is some evidence of his being an effective monarch. He was an active and hardworking king who wanted to se his ideas firmly established across England. He was also a pious man with a well-used book of hours. He had ability as a soldier and administrator. He also courted popularity by many means. He was dedicated to the promotion of justice, especially for the poor. ...read more.


He was frequently accused of wasting the surplus gained in his predecessor's reign, although Edward's military expenses, his funeral and Richard's own coronation, had considerably reduced it. By 1485 it was necessary for him to request loans from his greater subjects, which were largely not granted and deeply resented. There is also another side to the argument concerning the 1483 rebellion. Richard's speedy reaction to the rebellion meant that a lot of the danger was reduced; however it did continue to have a detrimental effect on his authority and power-base throughout his reign. Many of the rebel leaders had escaped and crossed the channel to join Henry Tudor in Brittany forming a court in exile. This turned Henry Tudor into a more serious threat and lost Richard a great deal of support. The rebellion also signified the failure to project himself as Edward's natural successor due to the high number of his brother's servants who rebelled. Therefore he attempted to impose his rule upon the southern subjects by putting members of his northern retinue in positions of power in the South. ...read more.


Although I have explained previously in this essay many ways in which Richard III attempted to win popularity, none seemed to work. The methods employed by Richard, when other kings in history had used them did succeed in gaining support, so it was not due to Richard's own effectiveness or ineffectiveness. Again the opposition towards him appears to have been based on the events of 1483 where his actions were interpreted as desperate, ruthless and hypocritical. It was not only his supposed murder of his nephews that caused resentment, people in the City of London were also against his murder of Lord Hastings during his time as protector, and uproar was only prevented through the use of Richard's retinue. Overall I believe that Richard III was ineffective as a monarch between 1483 and 1485. However, this is not wholly because of his individual character, but mainly the events and singularly ambitious nature of his usurpation that he could not conquer by any means. As A.R. Myers said in England and the Late Middle Ages "Had he come to the throne in the normal way, his ability...might have given him a long and successful reign. As it was...[his] qualities were not enough to overcome the formidable hostility to him." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Discuss Shakespeare's presentation of women in Richard III. Are they convincing characters?

    This tactic concludes in Richard's highly risky gesture of him offering his sword to her, but by being interrupted by his speeches Anne is unable to kill him: '.... Though I wish thy death, / I will not be thy executioner'- just what he was counting in her to say.

  2. The Battle of Bosworth.

    The spot Henry had picked to attack from was perfect. The slope was steep and so gave him protection and meant that Richard's force would have to come down from the steep slope to fight. The sheer steepness of the slope can be seen in the picture below: By defending Henry could hold off Richard and maintain and advantage.

  1. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    Either way it is possible to suggest that both academics accept the fact that in truth Henry II's reforms caused and opened the doors for freemen to become able to purchase land or property. Facts indicate that under the old legal system such rights had been denied.

  2. How Strong Was Henry VII's Position On The Throne In 1485?

    This did not bode well for Henry - if he could not secure loyalty from his nobles then it seemed likely they would try to replace him; Henry became King in battle - there was no reason he could not lose his position in the same way.

  1. How important was foreign support for Henry Tudor in explaining Richard III

    and Richard the younger of the two brothers because these rumours circulated many people who were loyal to Edward IV refused to accept Richard III so they did not oppose Henry when he arrived in England. Henry Tudor tried to invade England during Buckingham's rebellion but failed because he was

  2. Explain why Richard, Duke of Gloucester, made himself King in 1483.

    The Duke of Buckingham and Lord Hastings were two of Gloucester's main allies throughout the power struggle. Buckingham (Henry Stafford) had a remote claim to the throne, being descended from Edward III's youngest son. He controlled mostly lands in the Midlands and south-east Wales.

  1. Discuss the relationship between Richard II and its source 'How kyng Richarde the seconde....'

    / To help him to his grave immediately' (1.4.58-59) and Gaunt's own violent indictment of this 'unstaid youth' (2.1.2) finally and fatally undermine the 'showing' of Richard as a majestic, benevolent ruler. Conflicting voices compliment the contradictions between what Richard says and does.

  2. Explain why Richard, Duke of Gloucester seized the throne in 1483. [12 marks]

    This may have made it easier for Richard to adapt them for his own wishes, that is, stopping the Woodvilles from acquiring more control over the country. Since Edward V was under 16, it would be acceptable for Richard to rule on his behalf.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work