• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective was the leadership provided by prominent individual nationalists in Malaya?

Extracts from this document...


How effective was the leadership provided by prominent individual nationalists in Malaya? During the pre-war (1939) period, there was only one real nationalist leader: Yaacob Ibrahim. Al-Imam had no clear leader and was known more as a collective group of religious radicals. Pro-British aristocratic movements cannot be considered nationalism, as do other informal Malay groups set up to further the Malay agenda, but without the anti-colonialism and Independence-seeking evident in Yaacob Ibrahim's initiatives. His ambitious dream of Melayu Raya with peoples from Indonesia and Malaya unified under one state, Malays lifting themselves out of their downtrodden state, were in essence, a product of ethnic nationalism. In pursuit of his aims, Ibrahim co-founded two organisations: Belia Malaya, during his study at the Sultan Idris Training College for Teachers, and Kesatuan Melayu Muda (KMM), a few years after he graduated. He was the President for both societies. This essay will focus on the various facets of his co-initiative, the KMM in terms of the actions done towards his goal, the lack of popular support, organisation skills, achievements, and the raising of Malay consciousness. To determine if Ibrahim was effective as a nationalist leader, his achievements with regard to his aims and the political situation, and Sukarno in Indonesia will be explored in this essay. Ibrahim was effective in raising popular Malay consciousness about his ideals. He wrote a book, Surveying the Homeland, that stressed his antagonism towards colonialism and the Sultan patronage system, and imbued his analysis of Malay cultural and socio-economic change with a Marxist perspective. ...read more.


Ibrahim was ineffective in leading and uniting the members of KMM. The actions of the KMM in pursuit of its goals under the leadership of Ibrahim were also less than satisfactory. In 1938, the KMM launched an anti-British newspaper and publication propaganda attack on the government's policies which neglected Malay welfare, and on the Malay aristocrats and bureaucrats, based on the policy of "non-cooperation", inspired by Indonesia's PKI. This, however, was more of just empty, exhortatory words published in popular media which failed to translate into any real political action by the members of the KMM. If anything, it served to further alienate the ordinary Malay from the KMM ideals, though widespread publicity was achieved. Towards the end of 1939, the KMM held its first annual general meeting, meant to gain publicity and support for their ideals. Little aristocratic support was gained. On the whole, the anger towards the colonial powers and traditional elite was vented mostly in private (Roff, 1994) during these closed door discussion sessions about the future of the Malay race. There seemed to have been little political action, such as strikes against the government and political campaigning to the populace. Ibrahim was deficient in getting the members of the KMM to do larger things. Lastly, the achievements of Ibrahim Yaacob's initiatives were virtually zero. He failed to make an impact on his target audience, the people whose mindsets of backwardness and state provincialism he sought to change. The prestige of the Malay rulers and the aristocrats were untouched, and it would probably seem to the average Malay peasant, at ...read more.


This showed a lack of adaptability, proof of Ibrahim's ineffectiveness as a nationalist leader looking for support. To draw comparison of Ibrahim to Sukarno, even though Sukarno was advantaged in that there was widespread Malay resentment against the Dutch colonial powers in Indonesia, and in Malaya where the Malays were generally acquiescent to the status quo, like Sukarno, Ibrahim could have come up with similar peasant shows of wayang kulit (or similar traditions) to introduce to them pan-Malayan and other concepts. The fact remains that Ibrahim simply refused to involve the common Malay man in his efforts to expunge the British from Malaya, preferring to antagonise the British with propagandistic efforts instead, with very little popular support. This seeming apathy and lack of action towards his lack of popular support that meant that the British would not be easily coerced to give up Malaya proved to be an ineffective way of trying to achieve progress for the Malays and the pan-Malaya ideal. After balancing the difficulties that Ibrahim Yaacob faced as a radical nationalist leader, with Ibrahim's leadership style in comparison to Sukarno from Indonesia, in conclusion, he was ineffective as a nationalist leader as he failed to adapt to the situation where the Malay man was unreceptive to his ideas, in providing real alternatives to the British rule, and in his organisational skills, leading to the real failure of his nationalist initiative, the KMM in attaining his goals in the face of the unfavourable political situation. Comments: Good. A consistently relevant answer which focuses well on Ibrahim Yacoob's weaknesses. You might want to say rather more about his socialism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Historical Periods section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Historical Periods essays

  1. How successfully did the Labour governments of 1945-51 solve the social problems of the ...

    A fee of 15 shillings was to be paid for each patient, in addition to a salary.

  2. The First English Civil War

    to Walesladen, indeed with captured pikes and muskets, to raise a permanent field army. But Rupert could not be in all places at once. Newcastle was clamorous for aid. In Lancashire, only the countess of Derby, in Lathom House, held out for the King.

  1. To what extent is it true to say the Provisional Government faced an impossible ...

    it was a completely newly formed government with no previous successes to its name, it would be judged entirely on how well it dealt with Russia's problems. The fact that the Provisional Government suffered from this lack of legitimacy made their task even more complex as it meant that they

  2. The Colosseum essay

    The seating had different sections for the poor class, the upper class, and the emerging merchant or middle class. It also included more than 70 ground-level entrances and a complex net of tunnels, which allowed the venue to fill up in 15 minutes and be evacuated in as little as five.

  1. Mideival Outline Essay

    The mentioned states managed to achieve the stability required for economic growth and to consolidate their power which resulted in the territorial expansion. Feudalism became the predominant social system in most parts of Europe and Asia by the end of the 11th century.

  2. In the context of India in the 1840s to 1947, how far can independence ...

    Montagu, Secretary of State for India, presented his constitutional reform to give more representation to native Indians, becoming law in 1919. In reality, the Montagu-Chelmsford reforms did not go far enough to satisfy Indian expectations of self-government; as a result, Gandhi called upon people not to seek election to legislative

  1. How effectively did colonial governments respond to the rise of nationalism in Southeast Asia ...

    that they were not shy to use these to keep themselves in power. This conclusion was best revealed in a statement made by Jonkheer de Jonge, a businessman who was Governor-General (1931-36), ?We have ruled here for three hundred years with the policeman?s club?, he said, and things will be

  2. What can be learnt from a study of the Amesbury Archer and his grave ...

    stone indicates that the archer was able to work metals, which could be part of the explanation as to why he seemed to have such high status.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work