• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective were the Bolsheviks between 1903 and February 1917?

Extracts from this document...


HOW EFFECTIVE WERE THE BOLSHEVIKS BETWEEN 1903 AND FEBRUARY 1917? The Bolsheviks were born in 1903 out of the Social Democrat Party of Russia, after a split with the Mensheviks. By 1917, they had seized power in Petrograd. The effectiveness of the party during this period has been called into question and is a highly controversial topic. The Bolsheviks played a relatively minor part in the 1905 revolution, and were a minority in the St. Petersburg Soviet of Workers' Deputies led by Trotsky. The less significant Moscow Soviet, however, was dominated by Bolsheviks, and this certainly gave the party a model for the Soviets used in 1917. In order to assess the success of the Bolsheviks in the 11 years between the revolutions, the influence of the party on revolutionary activity must be looked at, as their ultimate aim was to achieve a socialist revolution. The first thing that must be considered is whether the party had developed a strong ideology, as this is crucial for revolution. ...read more.


Furthermore, there was controversy over whether to use legal or illegal methods and the use of expropriations to raise funds for the party. Therefore, this period was certainly not a completely successful period of 'purposeful regrouping', even if Lenin was able to publish his aims for the party. Another important source of evidence when assessing the effectiveness of the party is to look at how their actions influenced revolutionary activity. The party had more representatives than the Mensheviks and the Labourists in the 3rd and 4th Dumas, with 15 representatives in the 3rd increasing to 19 in the 4th, showing their growing popularity amongst the people. Lenin also published the daily newspaper, Pravda, which got closed down 8 times in its first two years of existence, but kept being reopened by the Bolsheviks under different names. In spite of police harassment, Pravda reached an average circulation of 40,000 between 1912 and 1914, about half of this being in St Petersburg. However, when the paper was closed in 1914, it did not reappear until after the February revolution. ...read more.


The Bolsheviks also allegedly received money from the Germans during the war, which was highly unpopular among Russians, and Lenin was accused of being a German spy. In the years between 1907 and 1914, most of the Bolshevik leaders were in foreign exile, making their work very difficult for Lenin and his comrades. Prospects for revolution seemed poor, there were problems with communication and funds were low. Before the war, there were already impending signs of revolution - but not of Bolshevik revolution. The party wanted to take full advantage of the First World War, which would accelerate the process of weakening the Tsarist structure so much that it would eventually give way to pressure from below. However, the Bolsheviks did not contribute much to this as other revolutionary groups were also opposing the war, and the Menshevik newspaper, Golos, blamed the conflict on the imperialism of the ruling classes, which is a similar line to the one that Lenin took. While in exile in Switzerland, Lenin was rarely able to give effective direction to his organisations in Russia. He refused to cooperate with the other revolutionary groups and insisted on maintaining a separate Bolshevik approach. The ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * Napoleon's only hope was that Austria, Prussia and Russia would quarrel over the future of Germany and Poland and that the coalition would collapse as a result. This was Britain's fear, but it was averted when intense diplomatic pressure by the British government led to the imposition of the Treaty of Chaumont on the coalition in March 1814.

  2. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    The proposals, which included, among other things, policies of no confidence in the Provisional Government and of fraternization between Russian and German troops, were voted down almost unanimously by the Bolshevik Central Committee. Among prominent Bolsheviks only Alexandra Kollontai supported Lenin.

  1. What had the Bolsheviks achieved by 1914?

    This piece of ideology led to one of the defining policies for the Bolsheviks from 1905-1914. This new theory established by Lenin showed that the Bolsheviks had learned lessons from the 1905 revolution, and this vital lesson was to affect many aspects of the Bolshevik policy in the years up until 1914.

  2. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    in the eyes of the Russian public, made Nicholas personally responsible for the failure of the war. Also, during the War, Nicholas had refused to work with the Duma, and was not prepared to make concessions to the representative government, which did not comply well with a positive future for

  1. Why were there two revolutions in Russiain 1917?

    On March 15 civil liberties are proclaimed and the promise of convening a constituent assembly is made. Political prisoners are amnestied and returned from Siberia. The police is replaced with a people's militia. Elections are postponed until the Constituent Assembly can meet.

  2. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    They argued that the working class of Russia had no interest or place in the war, and that even victory would offer the common people nothing. Industrialisation and Class Russia's industrial revolution came at the end of the 1800s, and therefore the beginning of the 20th Century marked a huge break in tradition for common people.

  1. The 1917 Revolution.

    The workers did not go into the street but more than 100,000 went on strike. Then during the next fortnight, with an aggravation of disturbances due to a breakdown of the food-rationing system, there were further strikes culminating in mass invasion of the central area of Petrograd from the industrial suburbs.

  2. Compare and Contrast the February and October Revolutions in Russia.

    The factors that led to Nicholas II, and subsequently to Russia?s downfall, were numerous. He was the monarch who brought Russia from being a prosperous country of thriving economic growth, to a country in ruins. Even though the amounts of mistakes which Russia?s last tzar made are countless, the foremost fatal step Russia?s entrance into the First World War.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work