• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effective were the Bolsheviks between 1903 and February 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HOW EFFECTIVE WERE THE BOLSHEVIKS BETWEEN 1903 AND FEBRUARY 1917? The Bolsheviks were born in 1903 out of the Social Democrat Party of Russia, after a split with the Mensheviks. By 1917, they had seized power in Petrograd. The effectiveness of the party during this period has been called into question and is a highly controversial topic. The Bolsheviks played a relatively minor part in the 1905 revolution, and were a minority in the St. Petersburg Soviet of Workers' Deputies led by Trotsky. The less significant Moscow Soviet, however, was dominated by Bolsheviks, and this certainly gave the party a model for the Soviets used in 1917. In order to assess the success of the Bolsheviks in the 11 years between the revolutions, the influence of the party on revolutionary activity must be looked at, as their ultimate aim was to achieve a socialist revolution. The first thing that must be considered is whether the party had developed a strong ideology, as this is crucial for revolution. ...read more.

Middle

Furthermore, there was controversy over whether to use legal or illegal methods and the use of expropriations to raise funds for the party. Therefore, this period was certainly not a completely successful period of 'purposeful regrouping', even if Lenin was able to publish his aims for the party. Another important source of evidence when assessing the effectiveness of the party is to look at how their actions influenced revolutionary activity. The party had more representatives than the Mensheviks and the Labourists in the 3rd and 4th Dumas, with 15 representatives in the 3rd increasing to 19 in the 4th, showing their growing popularity amongst the people. Lenin also published the daily newspaper, Pravda, which got closed down 8 times in its first two years of existence, but kept being reopened by the Bolsheviks under different names. In spite of police harassment, Pravda reached an average circulation of 40,000 between 1912 and 1914, about half of this being in St Petersburg. However, when the paper was closed in 1914, it did not reappear until after the February revolution. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Bolsheviks also allegedly received money from the Germans during the war, which was highly unpopular among Russians, and Lenin was accused of being a German spy. In the years between 1907 and 1914, most of the Bolshevik leaders were in foreign exile, making their work very difficult for Lenin and his comrades. Prospects for revolution seemed poor, there were problems with communication and funds were low. Before the war, there were already impending signs of revolution - but not of Bolshevik revolution. The party wanted to take full advantage of the First World War, which would accelerate the process of weakening the Tsarist structure so much that it would eventually give way to pressure from below. However, the Bolsheviks did not contribute much to this as other revolutionary groups were also opposing the war, and the Menshevik newspaper, Golos, blamed the conflict on the imperialism of the ruling classes, which is a similar line to the one that Lenin took. While in exile in Switzerland, Lenin was rarely able to give effective direction to his organisations in Russia. He refused to cooperate with the other revolutionary groups and insisted on maintaining a separate Bolshevik approach. The ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    With both of these combined, they produced a lack of moral throughout Russia, and so more discontent with how it was run. Also, in the war, Russia was never really a strong threat to Germany, and so the Tsar lost even more credibility as he had entered them into a pointless war.

  2. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    the country fully into a democracy and its capitalist period (represented by the Provisional Government's refusal to call for an election of the Constituent Assembly). Lenin argued that this weakness could be exploited by the proletariat completing the revolution, and making it a socialist revolution.

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    In one Guberniia, it is possible to see how far these massagers of revolutionary ideas had progressed by looking at the map: cantons near the railroad line went for the Bolsheviks and those further away for the S.R.'s, simply because the soldiers had worked the villages near the stations but had not penetrated into the interior.

  2. Why were there two revolutions in Russiain 1917?

    At this time the Social Revolutionaries dominated the Soviet since they represent the peasants, Russia's clear majority. Next in importance are the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks, in that order. Members had been elected in factories, workshops, and military barracks. There were a total of 2,500 representatives: one worker for each 1000 workers and one soldier for each company.

  1. What had the Bolsheviks achieved by 1914?

    This piece of ideology led to one of the defining policies for the Bolsheviks from 1905-1914. This new theory established by Lenin showed that the Bolsheviks had learned lessons from the 1905 revolution, and this vital lesson was to affect many aspects of the Bolshevik policy in the years up until 1914.

  2. The 1917 Revolution.

    promote individuals of worthless character who had taken the trouble to court his favour. Finally Rasputin was murdered in November 1916. If Nicholas had been willing to appoint a Prime Minister who had the confidence of the Duma, he might have kept his throne.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work