• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effectively did Alexander II cope with the problems which faced him on his succession?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Kitty McCargo-Walklate How effectively did Alexander II cope with the problems which faced him on his succession? Alexander II came to the throne in 1855, following Russia?s defeat in the Crimean war. The effects of this left Russia devastated. The war highlighted the ?backwardness? of Russia?s society and subsequent inability of the army and economy. Alexander had no sympathy for radical or liberal ideas, but he recognised that some improvements were necessary to preserve his autocratic system of government. One of the major problems that faced Alexander II upon his succession was the issue of Serfdom. Serfs were peasants that were bound to their landlord. They were forced to work on land and were given little in return. They were also restricted in their freedom, which was very limiting on their social life. Following Alexander?s rise to the throne there was an increase in moral speculation of serfdom and its immorality. This was proving harmful to Russia?s international reputation. Another major issue regarding serfdom was their conscription to the Russian army which was ...Finally serfdom was argued to be economic stagnation as it prevented the enterprise of the masses. ...read more.

Middle

The Crimean War revealed the weakness and corruption of leadership within the Russian army. Prior to the reforms the duty of military service fell exclusively on the lower class and peasants. The ranks were conscripted from Serfs for 15 years compulsory service. This caused many social and moral dilemmas. Women were left widowed as it was almost certain their husbands would not return, however if they did they were not compensated with a pension or land. This meant the army was extremely disorganised and lacked in moral. It was obvious that reform was needed in order for Russia to attain a successful army which would leader to a strengthening in internal and international control. In 1864 there was reorganisation of conscription. However; it was not until 1874 when major reform began to take place. This started with conscription being extended to all Russians over the age of 21. With the exception of those in education, conscription was partially exempted. To ensure equality names were drawn out of an annual ballot. ...read more.

Conclusion

The judicial reforms began in 1864 but did not make significant impact until the following year with the introduction of new regional courts. However from then the process to reform was slow. This was mainly due to aspects out of Alexander?s reach, such as the lack of trained judges. the high government influence over judicial roles as they controlled their promotional prospects. The judicial reforms were seen as one of the most successful reforms under Alexander II. Although there were slight imperfections to the new system the overall effectiveness in which Alexander dealt with judiciary was considerably good. He lowered corruption, made contributions to the modernisation process as a whole and helped to promote a society based on the rule of law. To conclude, following Alexander II succession to the throne there were a substantial amount of deeply rooted problems within Russia. He was able to examine the countries defects which were highlighted by the Crimean war and begin implementing an extensive programme of reforms. However; the extent to which he successfully reformed was restricted by his his firm conservative and traditional view of his duty which included his refusal to surrender his autocratic powers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How successful was Alexander II in transforming Russian Society

    Despite the huge impact of Alexander II's reforms, they did not all transform society, especially as he withdrew several in years to come. Emancipation did not stop any discontent from the lower classes, as following the Ukase, there were 647 riots in 4 months.

  2. Trotsky - Succession, Revolutionary Success, Civil War Hero, Death, Failure and End

    Dismissed as "the most eminent mediocrity in the party" by Trotsky, Stalin now had the power to appoint and dismiss party members, therefore allowing him to 'gradually place congenial party members in key posts'49. After Lenin's death, Stalin was a 'required ally'50, as he had by that time 'been able

  1. How well does Alexander II deserve his reputation as The Tsar Liberator(TM)?

    meet the needs of the crisis facing Russia"; this can certainly be supported by Russia's backwardness and desperation in the 1850s. However most historians consider this change to have been prompted by Alexander's first assassination attempt in 1866; either way the reforms became worthless when reforming ministers were replaced with more conservative figures.

  2. How effectively did Irish Catholic and Nationalist leaders advance their cause in the years ...

    Although this was a tragedy it did have some beneficial consequences - it raised awareness of the Fenian cause and forced Gladstone to later appease the Fenian demands. In 1867 another failed rescue plan took place, which took the lives of several civilians.

  1. Does Alexander II deserve his historical reputation?

    The zemtvo helped the Tsar increase his liberal image. However, not much was done to change the existing social order. The nobility controlled 75% of the zemstvo compared to only 10% held by peasantry. Therefore it is impossible to say that Alexander was the 'Tsar Liberator' as Russia was still not liberal and the peasantry were still classed to be below the nobility.

  2. How successful were the attempts by Alexander II to reform Russia?

    More importantly defence counsels were allowed and legal flogging was curtailed. These reforms were accepted by the public and were successfully applied. Once again, this policy can be linked to Alexander's reforms concerning the serfs. This new justice system allowed the poorer members of society to be given sympathetic hearings.

  1. Was Alexander II more successful than Alexander III in coping with the problems ...

    This came alongside the policy of Russification which forced the Russian on language onto those of foreign nationality and made the principle of Russian nationality fundamental to life within the country. The Okhrana were dedicated to enforcing religious, racial and national orthodoxy as well as restricting various parts of the population i.e.

  2. How effectively did Alexander II cope with the problems he faced on his succession?

    The lords who owned the serfs were also in some difficultly as in 1860 60% of all private serfs being mortgaged to the state. The serfs, further, came as a part of the land preventing the market of free labour, resulting in a stagnated economy, where it was widely felt even among Slavophil?s that serfdom had run its cause.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work