• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How effectively had the Weimar Governments dealt with Germany's Post World War one problems by 1928?

Extracts from this document...


Jack Pettitt How effectively had the Weimar Governments dealt with Germanys Post World War one problems by 1928? The Weimar Government faced economical, social and political problems after World War One and although the government had many different leaders and was unstable, it managed to survive. During this period the Government used the right-wing army and the Freikorps to crush the Communists in the Spartacist revolt, get help from the left-wing unions to crush the Kapp Putsch and saw the introduction of Stresemann and the Dawes Plan, leading to a period of prosperity which saw a cultural peak in Weimar Germany. Many historians argue that the Weimar Governments could have done more to help Germany in this crisis with the measures put in place not entirely effective, while others argue the actions of the Weimar Governments were not effective at all. Before World War One the German economy had grown exponentially having natural resources, a well educated population, a developed industrial base and an advanced banking system. However, with the war disrupting the German economy it lost areas resulting in a decline in coal and iron-ore and the decline in the strength of the Deutschmark saw a period of hyperinflation with over 6.6 billion reparations to pay to the allies. ...read more.


With the rejection of a constitutional monarchy and the introduction of the Weimar Government, Germany faced many political problems such as the introduction of proportional representation and the extreme left and right uprisings. General Erich Ludendorff, who was essentially the wartime dictator of Germany, became aware that Imperial Germany and an autocratic regime could not survive after the war. He hoped a change to a democratic regime would prevent the outbreak of political revolutionary disturbances; however, this was not the case. The introduction of proportional representation showed it encouraged the formation of many new splinter parties and made it virtually impossible for one party to form a majority government. Also, it was shown that a majority system of voting might have been more effective in combating attacks left and right and during the leadership of Friedrich Ebert, numerous uprising occurred, such as the Spartacist Uprising, Kapp Putsch and the Munich Beer Hall Putsch. Eventually, the Weimar Government needed a stable solution to the regular and constant uprisings. When Stresemann was introduced to tackle Germany?s problems, it was clear that the government dealt with the problems effectively as there was no further attempts to over throw the government and showed the extremist parties lost control. ...read more.


However, with France, Germany and Belgium accepting the existing borders, many Germans felt that the Locarno Treaty and Stresemann had brought disgrace and dishonour as they argued they were very restricted. Furthermore, France opposed it because they felt that they were not protected well enough from Germany. In comparison, the foreign affairs that Germany faced were not the most important part in the major problems the Weimar Government faced, but restricted Germany which led to later leaders wanting more control over land, causing further issues. In conclusion, the economic prosperity was limited and built upon unstable foundations which created a false image of prosperity and trust. However, with Germany in substantial debt and facing many crises, the government effectively dealt with the situation as Stresemann restored confidence and helped re-establish the structure and system of Germany. The most important problem Weimar Government solved was the economic crisis, as further tension and failure to meet demand for reparations would have led to possible violent solutions from the French. Overall, I think that the Weimar Government effectively dealt with the post war problems that Germany faced, even though the continuation of proportional representation allowed Hitler to become known on the political spectrum leading to the rise of Nazism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    would act boldly, taking considerable risks, as in the occupation of the Rhineland in 1936, or the invasion of Norway just before the major campaign in the west. Surprise was a favourite gambit of Hitler's, in politics, diplomacy, and war: he gauged the psychological effect of sudden, unexpected hammer-blows in paralyzing opposition.

  2. Explain how the Weimar Governments dealt with problems and threats between 1919 and 1943.

    Their anger was directed at the Treaty of Versaille and, more precisely, the reduction of Germany's army. When military leaders were refused their appeal to the President for a stoppage to troop reductions, L�ttwitz ordered the Marinebridge Ehrhardt to march on Berlin where they occupied the city.


    Michael Laffan argues that "Notably the conventions membership did not reflect the changes taking place in Irish political life, in particular the shift of Nationalist opinion towards Sinn Fein."21 The abandonment of the Southern Unionists by the Northerners saw

  2. Despite it all too obvious political and economic failings, in terms of its society ...

    Gropius condoned his pioneering strategy by stating, "The Bauhaus has quite consciously aimed to replace the principle of the division of labour by returning to collaborative work in which the creative process is perceived to be an indivisible whole." (6)

  1. “What arethe problems Historians associate with the term Fascism?”.

    as fascist, when it is actually not so since he does not consider many regimes, including Franco's in Spain, to be fascist. Lowe, on the other hand, separated fascism into five different points. A true fascist state must have extreme nationalism, a totalitarian system of government, one party state, economic self-sufficiency and finally military strength and violence.

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    The whole idea of the league was to stop aggressors and yet here they were trying to come to some sort of deal with them. Because of these meetings Mussolini thought that both Britain and France wouldn't object at Italy gaining another African colony of its own as both Britain and France had colonies of their own.

  1. Unification of Germany and the period up to the second world war

    reparations and was not happy and lost Alsace and Lorraine too Imperial Germany and the Second Reich I. Intro * Satisfied people and proud in war, prussianisation of the Germans and not union of equals II. Organization of the new empire * Head was to be the Prussian ruler and

  2. How effectively did Weimar governments deal with the problems faced between 1919-1929?

    During the fourteen years of the Weimar Republic, there were twenty separate coalitions. The government didn?t last very long, the longest government lasted 2 years. This political chaos caused many to lose faith in the new democratic system. Another reason for this was because the voting system (voters voted for a party rather than individual candidates)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work