• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far and why did the aims of the revolutionaries in France change during the period 1789-1793?

Extracts from this document...


How far and why did the aims of the revolutionaries in France change during the period 1789-1793? The aims of the revolutionaries changed in many ways between 1789 and 1793. In 1789, the bourgeoisie, who controlled the National Assembly, heavily influenced the aims of the revolution. They wanted to establish laissez-faire, abolish the privileges and exemptions from taxation the nobility and clergy had been granted before 1789 and give themselves more involvement in the running of the country, which they felt they deserved. They also aimed for equality before the law, and end to the feudal system, and a constitutional monarchy - they were keen to keep Louis XVI in power, but just not as an absolute monarch. They were also eager to abolish guilds and government restrictions on entry into particular businesses, as well as internal customs duties and to establish a national market. These aims were not radical - as demonstrated by the cahiers, which showed the liberal aristocrats to be more radical than the Third Estate! Demands were also much less radical than they became in 1792. The most radical events in 1789 were the October Days and the storming of the Bastille, both of which were tremendously less radical than the events that took place by 1793. ...read more.


The military defeats made it seem as though the monarchy were in league with the Austrians, and this came to a head with the Brunswick manifesto. Louis' actions were some of the primary causes of the growing Republican movement and radicalism. The execution of the King in 1792 demonstrated the growing radicalism in Paris. War was another leading event that changed the aims and objectives of the people of Paris between 1789 and 1793. It affected almost everything in France that happened in 1792 onwards and directly led to the civil war and the Terror, as well as being a great factor in the overthrow of the monarchy. Military defeats and desertions of commanders to the enemy created great tension and fear in Paris that the capital would be captured. Lafayette's desertion to the Austrians also led to panic sweeping the country. War led to suspicion of the monarchy - that they were in league with the Austrians and helping them, and led to the growing Republican movement as the moderates were weakened by Louis vetoes and seemingly less than committed attitude towards winning the war, whereas the sans-culottes' argument seemed much more credible and was much more popular. ...read more.


This was the same with the uprisings in Lyon and other federal towns. It was hard enough for the Convention to fight a war against the First Coalition and revolt from towns in France and counter-revolutionaries meant that odds of winning the war would be reduced further. Because of this, policies had to be adopted in order to crush these revolts to concentrate on the war before dealing with the problems within the country. This reason, along with war, the blunders and actions of the monarchy and the rise of the Jacobins and sans-culottes resulting in the weakening of the royalists and moderates led the bourgeois aims of 1789 - equality, laissez-faire, no internal customs, guilds, or privileges and exemptions, an end to the feudal system and a constitutional monarch granting them more power to run the country with - to change into the sans-culotte dominated aims of 1793, where control and order was needed in order to remove both internal and external enemies from France. The country aimed now to become a popular democracy with the right of insurrection and universal male suffrage - and if one was not a supporter of the radical demands of the revolution, one was removed from the country in order to regain control. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Explain why the Sans Coulottes had so much power by 1793

    This gave the sans culottes a sense of more power as the government never made any move to stop these massacres going on even Danton who had only made the suggestion also made move to stop this anti revolutionary matter from happening.

  2. How did the National Constituent Assembly reform France between 1789 and 1791?

    Furthermore, cases had to be brought to court within 24 hours and 'Courts of Appeal' were introduced. More humane sentences or punishments were to be had too. Instead of the medieval, barbaric practices such as torture, hanging and branding, a new and efficient method of execution was brought in: the guillotine.

  1. How far were the ideas of the "Philosophes" responsible for the outbreak of the ...

    Numerous assemblies were held to come to an agreement however the assembly of notables (high figures of society - bishops, nobility leaders etch) believed that the reforms would hit them the most and the Paris Parlement refused reform as they believed in 'no taxation without representation' where they could not

  2. How far did the reforms during the period 1826-39 contribute to the eventual fall ...

    As Cunningham notes, 'years later a British general watched with his own eyes as the Sultan supervised workmen striking the Janissary bonnets off gravestones in a Pera burial-ground'.xviii Goodwin substantiating Cunningham's argument states: 'Janissary headstones, topped by the cocky turban of the order, were knocked over'.xix Claims of acts of

  1. Florence Nightingale is well known for her radical innovations in nursing care.

    Her results showed an importance in decrease of death. By February 1855, the mortality rate had dropped from 60% to 42.7%. After the establishment of fresh water supply in addition to using personal funds to buy fruit, vegetables and standard hospital equipment, the mortality rate had dropped to 2.27% by spring time [1].

  2. How successful was the National Assembly bringing equality and liberty to France during 1789-93?

    This helped everyone, especially the Third Estate, where it brought a promise of a new system which was fair and equal. However, the Deceleration?s name ?man and the citizen? shows that woman during this time did not get the same treatment as men, this shows the major flaw with it,

  1. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    It also decided how much a farm could keep for its subsistence and the amount of money to be given as payment to collective famers: often very little leaving most farmers worse off than before serfdom.[18] This attack on the living standards of the peasantry goes to show the extent

  2. British dominance was unrivalled during the period of 1850-1929. How far do you agree ...

    As a nation, it also managed to create an influence in the newly found banking and financial system based in London, unearthing prosperity and uniqueness for the country, as well as the rest of the world. Despite its size, Britain managed to become the workshop of the world and the world?s banking house by 1870.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work