• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of Britain?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of Britain? Throughout Napoleon's reign, he was faced by a number of Coalitions set up against him which contained a number of different European states. However, the only constant in these coalitions was Britain, either through military opposition or economic support for the other elements of the coalition. Napoleon was obsessed with the need to defeat Britain, despite Britain not having any sizable power on mainland Europe, which led to, in a series of events, the introduction of the Continental System, the Peninsular War and the Russian campaign. Although it is difficult to assess Britain's importance in strict military terms, and many other factors were involved in the downfall of Napoleon, it is clear that the continuous opposition of Britain plays a vital role. Historians disagree over Britain's direct role in the downfall of Napoleon; Brendan Simms sees the Russian Campaign as the turning point that destroyed the Grande Arm´┐Że and this view is supported to differing extents by many other notable historians such as Jean Tulard and Martyn Lyons but Napoleon saw the start of his downfall as being "the Spanish Ulcer", a war that hinged on Britain's military presence. ...read more.

Middle

Napoleon could not allow those that did not comply to go on dealing with the British, and the common solution to this was to either appoint a relative as ruler of the country or simply annex it. The existence of the Continental System is not a factor in Napoleon's downfall in itself, but the actions Napoleon takes to secure the success of it are. Napoleon's wish to prevent Portugal from trading with Britain was a primary reason for invading the Iberian Peninsula. A further reason must be Napoleon's ambition and expansionist aims, which many historians believe made his downfall inevitable right from the outset. Initially, Napoleon's wars had been fought to secure what the French population saw as their natural boundaries, the Alps, the Rhine and the Pyrenees, which had received the support of the French people. However, as Jean Tulard puts it, "the campaigns of 1805 and 1806 were imposed upon her" but as they "conformed to the logic of the revolutionary wars" they were accepted by French opinion. The Peninsular War saw the first deviation from this theme, it was more to do with Napoleon's dynastic interests than an enlightenment for "black Spain". ...read more.

Conclusion

The role of Britain is a vital one in bringing down Napoleon, especially as it remained the only constant threat to France, excepting the uneasy peace of Amiens, and persuade the other continental powers to repeatedly take up arms against Napoleon. The Continental System is a further long term cause, as it forces Napoleon into actions that proved disastrous for France and Napoleon's own aspirations and sparked his downfall. The "Spanish Ulcer" drained much of France's resources and caused a split between Napoleon and the bourgeois but would not have brought down Napoleon on its own. If one factor has to be isolated to most explain the turn around of Napoleon's fortunes, it would have to be the Russian campaign, as it destroyed Napoleon's forces whilst galvanising his opponents, but it was not until Russia gained British support that it actually advanced outside its own borders to defeat Napoleon. Britain is like a cancer on Napoleon's empire, an ailment that Napoleon had no way to cure which constantly allowed the more potent scourges of Russia, Austria and Prussia to batter Napoleon's defences until eventually he was too weak to continue; the Napoleonic Empire dead. 1 Napoleon Bonaparte and the legacy of the French Revolution - Martyn Lyons 2 Europe under Napoleon 1799-1815 - Michael Broers ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "To what extent did napoleon lose the battle of Waterloo due to his own ...

    These two marshals also healed no sense of independence. This is a mistake on Napoleon's part that started from the beginning of his command in battles. Whenever in battle Napoleon was the nerve centre of the operation sending his command out from the Empirical headquarters.

  2. How far did Napoleon Bonaparte maintain the revolutionary ideals of liberty and equality in ...

    According to J.M Thompson 'The senatorial committee that protected the liberty of the press now had nothing to do, for there was no more liberty to protect'pg201. Napoleon also made use of spies and informants. This prevented opposition and aided in denying critics an audience.

  1. Why did Napoleon lose the Battle of Waterloo?

    but mistakes in communication as well as other areas, prevented the campaign from ending and Napoleon being victorious. Early in the afternoon on June 16, 1815, Napoleon heard the sound of Ney's artillery at the cross roads. He immediately began his attack on Blucher and the Prussian army.

  2. How significant a role did the British navy play in the French Revolutionary and ...

    Future invasion plans may have succeeded for Napoleon if it hadn't been for the British command of the seas. In 1803 Keith was in control of the North Sea, Cornwallis in the Channel and Nelson in the Mediterranean. The battle that really showed the extent of British naval power and the great leadership of Nelson was Trafalgar in 1805.

  1. The battle of Britain was an important turning point in the second world war ...

    So really it would be the end of Britain and Germany would have ended up the strongest again who had invaded and defeated every country that they had tried to. This would make Germany unbeatable and they would feel invincible as they would have known that they had defeated all of the countries that they had tried to.

  2. The Battle Of Britain

    German morale slumped and as many of the U-boats limped back to port, most of these in base were destroyed by the RAF. Only a handful of U-boats remained in the Atlantic and so the threat virtually ended. One other German threat in the Atlantic remained but this was easily dealt with.

  1. Napoleon Bonaparte.

    Eventually he gave himself up."9 He was forced into exile on the island of St. Helena where he wrote his famous memoirs and fought his last battle, a battle with cancer, which he eventually lost on May 5, 1821. Napoleon Bonaparte is probably most remembered for his military leadership but

  2. The Battle of Britain

    the whole of the electors of a state to decide a question of public importance) regarding Anschluss, a 'political union election' would be held that would cement and legalize his act of aggression on Austria. By the May of 1938, the Czechs began to mobilize their military forces, the Sudetan

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work