• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of Britain?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far can the downfall of Napoleon be explained by the continuous opposition of Britain? Throughout Napoleon's reign, he was faced by a number of Coalitions set up against him which contained a number of different European states. However, the only constant in these coalitions was Britain, either through military opposition or economic support for the other elements of the coalition. Napoleon was obsessed with the need to defeat Britain, despite Britain not having any sizable power on mainland Europe, which led to, in a series of events, the introduction of the Continental System, the Peninsular War and the Russian campaign. Although it is difficult to assess Britain's importance in strict military terms, and many other factors were involved in the downfall of Napoleon, it is clear that the continuous opposition of Britain plays a vital role. Historians disagree over Britain's direct role in the downfall of Napoleon; Brendan Simms sees the Russian Campaign as the turning point that destroyed the Grande Arm´┐Że and this view is supported to differing extents by many other notable historians such as Jean Tulard and Martyn Lyons but Napoleon saw the start of his downfall as being "the Spanish Ulcer", a war that hinged on Britain's military presence. ...read more.

Middle

Napoleon could not allow those that did not comply to go on dealing with the British, and the common solution to this was to either appoint a relative as ruler of the country or simply annex it. The existence of the Continental System is not a factor in Napoleon's downfall in itself, but the actions Napoleon takes to secure the success of it are. Napoleon's wish to prevent Portugal from trading with Britain was a primary reason for invading the Iberian Peninsula. A further reason must be Napoleon's ambition and expansionist aims, which many historians believe made his downfall inevitable right from the outset. Initially, Napoleon's wars had been fought to secure what the French population saw as their natural boundaries, the Alps, the Rhine and the Pyrenees, which had received the support of the French people. However, as Jean Tulard puts it, "the campaigns of 1805 and 1806 were imposed upon her" but as they "conformed to the logic of the revolutionary wars" they were accepted by French opinion. The Peninsular War saw the first deviation from this theme, it was more to do with Napoleon's dynastic interests than an enlightenment for "black Spain". ...read more.

Conclusion

The role of Britain is a vital one in bringing down Napoleon, especially as it remained the only constant threat to France, excepting the uneasy peace of Amiens, and persuade the other continental powers to repeatedly take up arms against Napoleon. The Continental System is a further long term cause, as it forces Napoleon into actions that proved disastrous for France and Napoleon's own aspirations and sparked his downfall. The "Spanish Ulcer" drained much of France's resources and caused a split between Napoleon and the bourgeois but would not have brought down Napoleon on its own. If one factor has to be isolated to most explain the turn around of Napoleon's fortunes, it would have to be the Russian campaign, as it destroyed Napoleon's forces whilst galvanising his opponents, but it was not until Russia gained British support that it actually advanced outside its own borders to defeat Napoleon. Britain is like a cancer on Napoleon's empire, an ailment that Napoleon had no way to cure which constantly allowed the more potent scourges of Russia, Austria and Prussia to batter Napoleon's defences until eventually he was too weak to continue; the Napoleonic Empire dead. 1 Napoleon Bonaparte and the legacy of the French Revolution - Martyn Lyons 2 Europe under Napoleon 1799-1815 - Michael Broers ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "To what extent did napoleon lose the battle of Waterloo due to his own ...

    These two marshals also healed no sense of independence. This is a mistake on Napoleon's part that started from the beginning of his command in battles. Whenever in battle Napoleon was the nerve centre of the operation sending his command out from the Empirical headquarters.

  2. Napoleon Bonaparte.

    The quality of life was greatly improved for the people of France and it was due to Napoleon and his strong, viable economic leadership. Napoleon felt that there was a need for new laws, especially property laws, in France. He developed the Code Napoleon that was an important milestone in

  1. How far did Napoleon Bonaparte maintain the revolutionary ideals of liberty and equality in ...

    According to J.M Thompson 'The senatorial committee that protected the liberty of the press now had nothing to do, for there was no more liberty to protect'pg201. Napoleon also made use of spies and informants. This prevented opposition and aided in denying critics an audience.

  2. The battle of Britain was an important turning point in the second world war ...

    Without it I don't think that Hitler would have been so powerful. Norway was quickly over run by Germany with help from a Norwegian traitor who obviously offered to help Hitler. The morale in Germany would most probably have been quite high as they had defeated and over run every

  1. Why was England able to defeat Napoleon by 1815?

    Napoleon, since England's economy was kept going and so it could fund the war effort. Due to the continental system failing, Napoleon decided to invade Spain, in order to make them enforce the system. This, for the first time, created a sense of nationalism in the enemy which was a force Napoleon harnessed successfully in his early years.

  2. To What extent was the unity of the allies the main factor in the ...

    France, but was the only country in Europe to be allowing British cargo ships into their ports. Napoleon became very angry at this and decided that he was going to do something about it. He gave secret encouragement to the Turks that things would change shortly and raised a massive army.

  1. The Battle Of Britain

    He urged the British people to conduct themselves so that "if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years men will still say: 'This was their finest hour." By successful co-operation with President Roosevelt he was able to secure military aid and moral support from the United States.

  2. To what extent was Napoleon nothing more than a dictator?

    It had two aims: to stifle opposition, whilst rousing morale among civilians. He used military bulletins to accentuate French victory throughout the campaign, with the government paper Le Moniteur playng a key role in promoting the benefits of Napoleonic rule.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work