• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far could the fall of the Tsars be considered the most significant turning point in the development of modern Russia, during the period 1856 1964?

Extracts from this document...


How far could the fall of the Tsars be considered the most significant turning point in the development of modern Russia, during the period 1856 ? 1964? During the period 1856 ? 1964 it could be viewed that there were many events, both political and economical, which could be considered turning points in the development of modern Russia for the impact they had on the country, and there is much historical debate over which was most significant. The strongest argument is that the fall of the Tsars was the most significant turning point, as it signified the beginning of the rule of the people and the Bolsheviks who replaced state capitalism with war communism in 1918. Historian Kevin Ramage supports this view and wrote that the end of Romanov rule ?culminated in the coming to power of the working class, led by the Bolshevik Party?[1]. However, there are other turning points which could be considered to be the most significant, such as events during Tsarist rule or in that of Stalin or Khrushchev, or even World War One, which Glenn E. Curtis believed ?exposed the weakness of Nicholas II's government?[2], which allowed it to fall, which could make it the most significant turning point as without it, the Bolsheviks would not have come to power. The fall of the Tsars was the most significant turning point in the development of modern Russia as after the abdication of Nicholas II following the 1917 February ...read more.


had increased by three fifths over output in 1932?[11]. This was definitely necessary to do before the war as Stalin had to equip Russia?s large army, so had to modernise the country industrially. It could also be seen that Stalin?s politics regarding the Five Year Plans modernised the education of Russia as the initial ideas of Lenin and the Bolsheviks included an ?attack on book learning and traditional academic standards?[12]. This then meant that during the time of Stalin, people were entering the work place with inadequate education. To address this problem, Stalin introduced a new education system during the 1930s, which included ten years of compulsory education for children and a curriculum which taught the key subjects, so that they were prepared to join the workforce and help modernise Russia. Additionally, it has been suggested that it was Khrushchev?s reign from 1953 and not that of the Bolsheviks which was a key turning point in the development of modern Russia as Khrushchev criticised Stalin for his personality cult and therefore, the de-Stalinisation of the Soviet Union began. This view is supported by Glenn E. Curtis, ?Khrushchev denounced Stalin's tyrannical reign in 1956?[13] as he was ?signalling a sharp break with the past?. This sharp break from the past can be seen when considering the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis because this event could be viewed as the beginning of the end of the Cold War, as a consequence of Khrushchev attempting to install missiles ...read more.


Curtis - The Last Years of the Autocracy - http://countrystudies.us/russia/7.htm [3] Dr J E Swain - http://www.pinkmonkey.com/studyguides/subjects/worldhis/chap12/w1212301.asp [4] Christopher Hill ? Lenin and the Russian Revolution - published 1971 [5] Michael Lynch ? Reaction and Revolutions: Russia, 1894-1924 ? published 2005 [6] Glenn E. Curtis - Revolutions and Civil War - http://countrystudies.us/russia/8.htm [7] Sheila Fitzpatrick ? The Russian Revolution ? published 1982 [8] Alex De Jonge - ?Life and Times of Grigorii Rasputin? ? published 1982. [9] Margaret Cambridge - http://www.pvhs.chico.k12.ca.us/~bsilva/projects/russia/stalin/5yearplan.htm [10] Stephen J Lee - Russia and the USSR, 1855-1991: autocracy and dictatorship ? published 2001 ? page 146 [11] Robert Service ? Stalin, A Biography ? published 2004 ? page 318 [12] Michael Lynch ? Bolshevik and Stalinist Russia 1918-56 ? published 2005 ? page 163 [13] Glenn E. Curtis ? The Khrushchev Era - http://countrystudies.us/russia/13.htm [14] Russian historians - Khrushchev's Cold War: The Inside Story of an American Adversary ? published 2006 ? page 489 [15] Khrushchev?s son - http://english.pravda.ru/news/russia/17-04-2004/56652-0/ [16] Joel Carmichael ? A Short History of the Russian Revolution ? page 19 [17]Honna Michelle Eichler ? History 2260 - Modern World, September 12, 2003 - http://www.thenagain.info/webchron/easteurope/FreeSerfs.html [18] Huge Seton-Watson ? The Russian Empire 1801-1917 (Great Britain; Oxford University Press, 1967) ? page 341 [19] Glenn E. Curtis ? The Last Years of Autocracy - http://countrystudies.us/russia/7.htm [20] Hutchinson Encyclopaedia ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    This had again demonstrated that the peasantry were often used as a scapegoat and neglected in favour of industry throughout the period. In contrast, the agrarian reforms under Stolypin brought real improvement and some argue that this was the most prosperous time for the peasantry within the period.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Stalin never took on all his opponents at the same time: he preferred to challenge them one by one or in small groups. * Stalin was never totally committed to any policy. He was on the right against Trotsky and the left against Bukharin.

  1. Assess the view that Russias communist leaders did less than the Tsars to improve ...

    The subsequent increase in literacy rates did improve the workers quality of life, and despite the Tsarist regime laying the groundwork, the biggest rate increases were seen under the communists. In June 1962, there were protests in the city of Novocherkassk regarding poor housing, food shortages and wage cuts, as there were prior to the 1905 and 1917 revolutions.

  2. How far do you agree that the assassination of Alexander II in 1881 was ...

    However this was to be completely disregarded by the Tsar who saw them as little more than advisory body whom he could listen to or ignore as he saw fit. He was not prepared to accept any compromise to his power and had actually never intended to stick to the

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    As the USSR had little money in modern machinery most of the work had to be done by hand therefore needing millions of workers a figure that could not be met by volunteers. That's why Stalin ordered forced labour to be introduced.

  2. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    This was supported by the fact that the Provisional Government was made up mainly of middle-class land owners. The Bolsheviks' Marxist theories told them that Russia would have to go through a long period of capitalism before their desired socialist revolution by the proletariat (working-class).

  1. 'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree ...

    The army was continually used by both communist and tsars too. The Polish Revolt in 1863 was easily crushed by the Russian military, and in 1956 the Hungary Rebellion faced the same level of brute force. This showed how the importance of the army to the Russian state, evident in 1855, had remained the case in 1964.

  2. How far does a study of the period 1855 to 1956 suggest that, following ...

    similarities with the Tsar: the Supreme leader, who made major decisions and was given divine status, as demonstrated by the Fundamental Laws. Under the Tsars there was no tradition of democratic institutions; Stalin ruled by a Soviet Democracy where the 1936 constitution allowed direct election of all government bodies.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work