• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did Alexander III successfully solve the problems he faced in 1881, by the end of his reign in 1894?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How far did Alexander III successfully solve the problems he faced in 1881, by the end of his reign in 1894? This could be argued that Alexander III was successful to a certain level in order to solve the problems he faced when he came to power by the end of his reign. He implemented various solutions to the difficulties he overcome during the start of his power. However not all the measures he took still existed towards the end of his reign, some of the measures he took didn't work and hence the problem was still there while few of the measures continued under his son Nicholas. The problems he faced upon becoming the Tsar and the solutions he implemented that continued till the end of his reign were as follow: He faced the problem of keeping the world?s largest multi-ethnic empire together. In order to solve the language barrier and restrict the language diversity allowed across the empire while also bringing unity, he enforced the policy of Russification insisting on the Russian language. People were forced to adapt to the Russian customs and tradition and had to speak Russian which was made a compulsory language across the country. ...read more.

Middle

Universities were a particular area singled out for strict government supervision. University fees were increased to exclude all but the very wealthy as a result Universities lost their self government and came under government control. The assassination of the Tsar threatened the entire social and political system of the Russian empire. At the top were members of the landed aristocracy and senior members of the Russian Orthodox Church. The aristocracy did not have a popular support from the Russian people and the senior members of the Russian Orthodox Church derived much of their power from the Tsar, so a threat to the Tsar meant a threat to their position aswell. Hence as a result when he launched a campaign of repression, it had abolished support from the upper levels of Russian society. This carried on through his Tsar life until 1894, by the time of his death his liberal minister Konstatin Pobendonostev who was the chief Procurator of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church who played a vital role in dominating immense power and was very influential. He was the person who masterminded Alexander III Manifesto. Pobendonostev believed that basis of political and social stability lay in support for autocracy, the Russian Orthodox Church and Russian nationalism. ...read more.

Conclusion

His first finance minister Nikolia Bunge implemented laws which reduced the tax burden on peasants. He also established a Peasant Land Bank, which offered loan facilities to peasants to help them increase the size of their landholdings and make them more productive. He funded them money to settle themselves in the regions that were less capable of providing grains so that they could resolve the issue and improve the conditions. But towards the end of his reign, In the countryside, peasant outbreaks increased due to increasing land shortage. The peasant population continued to grow and their problems seemed to be worse than before. Pressure on the land use meant that the increasing peasant population had less hand per family to feed themselves. The land issue in Russia rose into a violent unrest in the early years of twentieth century. As a result the shortage of peasant landholdings continued to be a problem. As a conclusion, although the autocratic Tsar was successful in using repression to keep his autocratic position safe and he found a solution to all his problems that he was facing during the start. However, most of them didn?t last till the end of reign hence the problems still occurred and even continued till his son Nicholas II came in power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far do you agree that the assassination of Alexander II in 1881 was ...

    Overall though the Tsar had looked to use emancipation as a way of increasing his power and he clearly did not learn from this as many of the subsequent reforms he passed did much the same.

  2. How well equipped was Tsar Nicholas II to deal with the problems that faced ...

    Also the party had high class intellectual leaders, however the peasants, their support base were very weak as a political force because of their lack of education and their general insignificance in the grand scheme of Russia were a feudal system was in place and peasants were on the bottom rung of this 'social ladder'.

  1. Was Russia more or less stable by 1881?

    The revolutionaries were disappointed that Nicolas was made tsar instead of his -considered as more liberal- brother Constantine. Though Nicolas suppressed the uprising, some historians say that it were actually the "Decembrist" who frightened Nicolas I into a conservative and repressive policy.

  2. How effectively did Alexander II cope with the problems which faced him on his ...

    When assessing how well Alexander dealt with the issue of Serfdom we can infer that his attempt was a success in starting the process of reformation, however the reform of the serfs itself seems to lead massive disruptions within society, the economy and agriculture.

  1. Opposition was the main problem facing Alexander III. How far do you agree with ...

    The emancipation of the serfs and creation of zemstvas gave a hope that Russia is modernising. Also educational reforms made a new class called ?intelligencia? who shared western liberal views. As well as there were extremist groups that felt the only way for Russia to change was eradication of the

  2. 'Alexander III was the most successful Tsar in the period 1855-1917'. How far do ...

    However, Witte's programme led to significant long term growth (of around 8%), which lasted up to the start of the war. Moreover, later agricultural development built on his railway network, as well as on his policy of a peasant land bank, and newly available workforce meant that industry was better able to meet problems by diversifying products.

  1. Was Alexander II more successful than Alexander III in coping with the problems ...

    In contrast it can be argued that Alexander III was successful in coping with the problem of opposition. The situation he had inherited in this regard was much worse than that of his father. Opposition had become much more dangerous to the regime in the years between 1855 and 1881 clearly highlighted as they ended Alexander II?s reign.

  2. How effectively did Alexander II cope with the problems he faced on his succession?

    In an attempt to uplift the economy, and among other factors, Alexander implemented the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. This did not, however, have the desired effect. The emancipation proved difficult, as questions such as who should own the land were inhibiting the policy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work