• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did Alexander III successfully solve the problems he faced in 1881, by the end of his reign in 1894?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How far did Alexander III successfully solve the problems he faced in 1881, by the end of his reign in 1894? This could be argued that Alexander III was successful to a certain level in order to solve the problems he faced when he came to power by the end of his reign. He implemented various solutions to the difficulties he overcome during the start of his power. However not all the measures he took still existed towards the end of his reign, some of the measures he took didn't work and hence the problem was still there while few of the measures continued under his son Nicholas. The problems he faced upon becoming the Tsar and the solutions he implemented that continued till the end of his reign were as follow: He faced the problem of keeping the world?s largest multi-ethnic empire together. In order to solve the language barrier and restrict the language diversity allowed across the empire while also bringing unity, he enforced the policy of Russification insisting on the Russian language. People were forced to adapt to the Russian customs and tradition and had to speak Russian which was made a compulsory language across the country. ...read more.

Middle

Universities were a particular area singled out for strict government supervision. University fees were increased to exclude all but the very wealthy as a result Universities lost their self government and came under government control. The assassination of the Tsar threatened the entire social and political system of the Russian empire. At the top were members of the landed aristocracy and senior members of the Russian Orthodox Church. The aristocracy did not have a popular support from the Russian people and the senior members of the Russian Orthodox Church derived much of their power from the Tsar, so a threat to the Tsar meant a threat to their position aswell. Hence as a result when he launched a campaign of repression, it had abolished support from the upper levels of Russian society. This carried on through his Tsar life until 1894, by the time of his death his liberal minister Konstatin Pobendonostev who was the chief Procurator of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church who played a vital role in dominating immense power and was very influential. He was the person who masterminded Alexander III Manifesto. Pobendonostev believed that basis of political and social stability lay in support for autocracy, the Russian Orthodox Church and Russian nationalism. ...read more.

Conclusion

His first finance minister Nikolia Bunge implemented laws which reduced the tax burden on peasants. He also established a Peasant Land Bank, which offered loan facilities to peasants to help them increase the size of their landholdings and make them more productive. He funded them money to settle themselves in the regions that were less capable of providing grains so that they could resolve the issue and improve the conditions. But towards the end of his reign, In the countryside, peasant outbreaks increased due to increasing land shortage. The peasant population continued to grow and their problems seemed to be worse than before. Pressure on the land use meant that the increasing peasant population had less hand per family to feed themselves. The land issue in Russia rose into a violent unrest in the early years of twentieth century. As a result the shortage of peasant landholdings continued to be a problem. As a conclusion, although the autocratic Tsar was successful in using repression to keep his autocratic position safe and he found a solution to all his problems that he was facing during the start. However, most of them didn?t last till the end of reign hence the problems still occurred and even continued till his son Nicholas II came in power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far should the first period of Alexander Is reign (1801-1815) be seen as ...

    in 1803, this eventually led to the emancipation of forty-seven-thousand serfs by 1825. He did manage to emancipate some of the serfs in non Russian provinces, such as Estonia. The number of serfs that were emancipate may have been a small proportion of the population of serfs, but it showed

  2. How well equipped was Tsar Nicholas II to deal with the problems that faced ...

    The party was run by intellectual men such as Lenin and Trotsky, however the leaders of this party were in exile and so could not unite support or conduct party matters very well since they were in different countries. The Tsar could deal with opposition groups in one of two ways.

  1. How far do you agree that the assassination of Alexander II in 1881 was ...

    Another turning point that did not carve out as much change as would be expected was the revolution of 1905. It was the result of years of disappointment in reforms that did not go far enough, of a disastrous and humiliating war defeat, of appalling conditions in both the countryside and the towns and of an inept Tsar.

  2. How Serious Were The Problems Facing Nicholas I at the Start of His Reign

    On that day Nicholas had been informed of both the Northern Society and the Southern Society by General Miloradovich. The general informed Nicholas that the Northern Society's activities were being monitored, which was true, and that they posed no real threat, which was more debatable.

  1. Was Alexander II more successful than Alexander III in coping with the problems ...

    In contrast it can be argued that Alexander III was successful in coping with the problem of opposition. The situation he had inherited in this regard was much worse than that of his father. Opposition had become much more dangerous to the regime in the years between 1855 and 1881 clearly highlighted as they ended Alexander II?s reign.

  2. 'Alexander III was the most successful Tsar in the period 1855-1917'. How far do ...

    Additionally, only 22 per cent of peasants took control of their own land through the reforms . However on the other, the moving of 3.5 million peasants to Siberia, 27 per cent of peasants leaving communes, the double in sales of machinery, and an increase in yield of two thirds,

  1. Opposition was the main problem facing Alexander III. How far do you agree with ...

    Any opposition and other political views were direct threat to the Church officials, which made them to support Tsars repressions. As well as majority of Aristocracy shared Tsars policies because they existed only due to the existing monarchy, that?s why they supported Tsars fear and hatred of opposition and believed that it was the main problem of Russia.

  2. How far was Russian economic policy determined by practical requirements between 1881 and 1922?

    due to Sergei Witte?s rapid industrilisation, even before the war, was proving difficult to feed adequately due to outdated farming methods. Another illustration of the war influencing economic policies can be seen in the First World War, when Tsar Nicholas II and his government ensured the industrial change of factories

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work