• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did dtente introduce a new era of co-operation in US-Soviet relations during the 1970s?

Extracts from this document...


How far did détente introduce a new era of co-operation in US-Soviet relations during the 1970s? After bringing the world to the brink of nuclear war in 1962, Russia and America embarked on a period of ‘détente’ where both sides sought to improve their relationship and prevent worldwide nuclear disaster. The extent of co-operation that it brought about relied on a number of factors throughout the decade: the Strategic Arms Limitation (SALT) Treaties I and II, including their diplomatic successes and inability to end the Arms Race; the Helsinki Accords in 1975, which helped the relationship between the two Superpowers deteriorate, and the role of wars by proxy, which ultimately ended détente. The period of détente saw great progress in terms of official visits, trade, handshakes and political rhetoric, but in real-world terms the escalating Arms Race and the underlying problems of the Cold War were not addressed. The two nations continued to come into conflict, although now in a less direct sense. The co-operation that was brought about only stemmed from the vested interests the two had, rather than as a sign that the Cold War tensions were fading. It is clear therefore whilst there was a noted improvement from the situation in 1962, the 1970s did not bring any meaningful cooperation. ...read more.


The treaty failed to mention the new American multiple independently-targeted re-entry vehicles (MIRVs) and hence most nuclear weapons permitted were upgraded. There was also no range on long range bombers or satellite weapons. Nuclear stockpiles increased on both sides as a result. Under Nixon?s administration the Pentagon added 3 new warheads per day. By 1973 America had 6,000 warheads, to the Soviets 2,500. By 1977 America had 10,000 to the Soviets 4,000. Such restrictions were likened to ?freezing the cavalry but not the tanks?. The public was submitted to a positive view of events. Nixon visited Moscow and Brezhnev visited Washington, with both sides promised to not take a unilateral advantage. However after meeting in Moscow, Nixon and Kissinger went to Iran, and offered the Shah unlimited access to US arms. The SALT I Treaty may have marked a significant step in cooperation in the sense that it was the first official agreement for years, but it did very little to address the tangible dangers and problems of the Cold War. Thus its cooperation did not have the capability to tackle the increasing risk of conflict. As with its predecessor, SALT II was negated by loopholes and flaws, greatly limiting the cooperation brought about. ...read more.


After withdrawing from SALT II he encouraged a boycott of Moscow Olympics. By this point even diplomatic cooperation was out of the question. He increased arms spending, and his successor Ronald Reagan was elected mainly on campaign of anti-Russian policies. This brought the flawed period of détente, along with its unfulfilled aims of cooperation, to a close. In conclusion, every significant agreement and treaty failed to effectively halt the arms race or fully discourage aggression or conflict. It introduced cooperation only in the most political and restrictively official terms. The arrival of Ronald Reagan and the situation in Afghanistan conclusively ended cooperation, and splits in the Communist bloc apparent then and would lead to its collapse. The failure of détente can be largely put down to problems from the start; the US misunderstood détente as simply a relaxation of tension whilst the Soviets considered the class war between communism and capitalism to be ongoing. Thus they never fully expected long lasting cooperation, explaining why it did not result. This is apparent in the insincere Russian acceptance of the third basket in the Helsinki accords. Whilst cooperation did improve economically and diplomatically, the very real threat of nuclear war did not fade during the 1970s. As such, détente’s flaws encouraged the development of indirect wars that merely opened a new channel (of conflict not of cooperation) during the Cold War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Superpower Relations 1945-90

    The USSR (and France) wanted to keep Germany weak to prevent her ever causing another war in Europe. The USA and Britain wanted to avoid punishing Germany too harshly (as had occurred after WW1). They also saw a strong Germany as a useful buffer against the spread of Communism.

  2. What part did Ronald Reagan play in bringing the Cold War to an end?

    had to appear to be taking a firm approach towards the U.S.S.R. The fact that Reagan ratified the SALT II treaty in 1981 is clear evidence of his belief in arms reductions and he would continue this once Gorbachev came to power.14 Therefore Reagan was not as 'hawkish' as he

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    Despite its official posture of neutrality, the United States had a vested interest in the victory of England and France over Germany. America's own military security, her trade lines with England and France, economic and political control over Latin America and South America - all would best be preserved if Germany were defeated.

  2. Japan: Post-Occupation Era 1952-80

    Once elected as a Diet member, a LDP member found that the only way to advance?? in the party, to obtain advantages for his district and to gain further campaign funds????was to attach?? himself to an influential leader within the party.

  1. China's Relationship With The West

    The Chinese believed that Britain looked for an opportunity to provoke the Chinese authorities and they blamed the start of the Second Opium War on them saying that because of the Qing government's weakness it led Britain to find a pretext to launch the next war.


    they did this in retaliation to the Egyptians closing the Suez Canal to the Israelis. As well as that the Israelis wanted to stop soviet arms being used and reached by the Egyptians. Clearly a long term cause of the '73 war due to it almost triggered another war in the region (History of Israel).

  1. Why was there détente in the 1970s?

    The type of rocket that had launched Sputnik 1 could also launch nuclear warheads. This was demonstrated previously in 1957, with the successful testing of Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBM's). Russia could now launch a successful 'first strike.' The U.S had the problem of overcoming the 'missile gap,' and also developing

  2. The Cuban Missile Crisis was the most serious U.S.-Soviet confrontation of the Cold War

    Kennedy began to restrict U-2 flights over Cuba and pilots were told to avoid flying the whole length of the island. The President hoped this would ensure that a U-2 plane would not be shot down, and would prevent Cuba from becoming a major issue during the congressional election campaign.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work