• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? Throughout the period 1856-1964, there was considerable change and continuity between the different agricultural policies implemented by successive Russian governments. From how they regarded and engaged with the peasantry, to the investment that was put into agriculture and how famines were caused and dealt with. For the Tsarists and the Communists the peasantry has always represented the biggest obstacle to progress, the desire for both regimes was to transform and control rural life through their respective agricultural policies. Appointed Prime Minister (1906) by Nicholas II[1], Stolypin was instructed to overhaul government policy on land distribution and thus capitalise on the now free peasants in order to ?wager on the strong?[2]: in which he meant the wealthier peasants. The Emancipation Edict (1861)[3] created these, now free, peasants out of the slavery of Serfdom. Once working on the lands of the Lord of the Manner these peasants were given an allocation of land by the government ? for which they would pay for over 49 years of redemption payments at 6% interest.[4] The result of this extra burden on the peasants, along with the fact they now farmed land that was now, on average, 1/5th less than before emancipation,[5] was initially severe disturbances: 1859 in the year of emancipation, reducing to 65 eight years later.[6] The downward trend is then perhaps evidence that peasants felt they had gained something from emancipation. Nevertheless, unrest peaked in 1905-1907 during Nicholas II?s reign[7] ? Stolypin?s aim was to create a wealthier more productive class of peasants out of these disgruntled ones. These would, in theory, be more loyal to the Tsar. With the opening of the Peasant Land Bank (1883)[8] ? allowing peasants to purchase land ? and the weakening of the Mir ? allowing peasants to consolidate this land into small holdings ? Stolypin?s Reforms led to an increase from 48,271 independent farms in 1907, to 134,544 in 1913[9]. ...read more.

Middle

With the seizure of power by the Bolsheviks in the October revolution came civil war. After a brief spell of State Capitalism between 1917 and 1918[44] the government decided to take direct control of economic life with War Communism ? in June 1918 a decree nationalised all industries.[45] Production would collapse though, as the transportation of goods and raw materials were disrupted by the Civil War (1918-21). In order for industry to continue production the urban workings needed feeding. Yet the farming production had also dropped: the index fell from 100 in 1913, to 31 in 1921.[46] Lenin, in spite of the inevitable results on the peasants, sent in the requisitioning squads into the villages in 1918-1920 to collect grain.[47] In the latter two years they also confiscated seed-grain and subsistence food that the peasants needed to feed themselves and their families.[48] The Civil War may have been unavoidable, but the confiscation of grain during it helped lead to the deaths of 5 million people during the famine of 1921-22.[49] The inaction on the side of the Communist government only escaped shouldering the responsibility of more deaths by reluctantly accepting support from the American Relief Administration: an estimated 14 million people were kept alive as a result.[50] Lenin did attempt to redeem himself with the New Economic Policy (1921) [51] at the end of the Civil War ? as it was clear his government was facing a national emergency. In order to spur on the recovery of agriculture, Lenin old the Tenth Party Congress to ?let the peasants have their little bit of capitalism.?[52] With this a Tsarist style free market, on which the peasants could trade any surplus crops, was reintroduced. Production went up and by 1925 grain harvest was 72.5 million tons, compared to 37.6 million in 1921.[53] Throughout the Civil War there had been little regard for the starving peasants, but with it drawing to a close Lenin saw his opportunity to undo his mainly manmade famine. ...read more.

Conclusion

p114-121. [32] Holland, A (2002). Russian and its Rulers 1885-1964. P134-135. [33] Holland, A (2002). Russian and its Rulers 1885-1964. P134-135. [34] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p263-265. [35] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p263-265. [36] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p263-265. [37] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p263-265. [38] Lynch, M (2008). From Autocracy to Communism 1894-1941. p141-144. [39] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p263-265. [40] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p263-265. [41] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p263-265. [42] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p263-265. [43] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p263-265. [44] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p124-129. [45] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p124-129. [46] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p124-129. [47] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p124-129. [48] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p124-129. [49] American Experience. (2011). The Great Famine. Available: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/introduction/famine/. Last accessed 10th Nov 2014. [50] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p124-129. [51] Evans, D/ Jenkins, J (2008). Russia, The USSR and the Collapse of Soviet Communism. P 271-280. [52] Oxley, P (2001) Russia ? From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. P131. [53] Hove, A (1992). An Economic History of the USSR, 1917-1991. p89. [54] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. p45-46. [55] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. P45-46. [56] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. P45-46. [57] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. P45-46. [58] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. P45-46. [59] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. P45-46. [60] Oxley, P (2001). Russia - From Tsars to Commissars 1885-1991. P45-46 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    This use of ideology led to his unquestionable rule like that experience under the Tsars, but Stalin emphasized separation of the state from the Church, unlike The Tsarist autocratic rule was strengthened by the support from the Russian Orthodox Church.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the view that the lives of the peasants in Russia did not improve ...

    4 star(s)

    of men could read and write under Lenin compared to just 51% in 1897, before Stolypin took over. The peasantry would have a far better quality of life, although still mediocre, with the ability to read. This vast improvement in literacy is one of the most neglected changes within the period.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Explain how the effects of the First World War caused the collapse of the ...

    4 star(s)

    Bolsheviks, the unpopularity of the Provisional Government, Tsar Nicholas II's rule and abdication, Lenin's strong leadership, the effects of World War One and mutiny in the army. Although all of these factors were important, I think that the effects of World War One were more significant than the others.

  2. Stalin and Russia, 1929-41.

    He was decorated with the Order of Lenin but other workers were expected to match him. Those who worked hard were known as Stakhanovites. They received better flats and Black Sea holidays. 6. A third Five Year Plan was introduced in 1938.

  1. Explain why the opponents of the Tsars from 1855 to 1917 were more successful ...

    By contrast, when opponents did enjoy success, as in the February Revolution and the October Manifesto, it was because they had united behind one common cause. The peasantry were consistent opponents to the regimes, however the lack of unity they possessed meant that a full scale peasant revolt was never likely to occur.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * 1928 Party Congress; the Right argued against Stalin's actions. They thought that the peasants would produce more if NEP continued and they had the opportunity to become prosperous. * There was a 'war-scare' in the USSR in 1927/8. The Right's policies offered only gradual industrialisation, but military strength has to be built on industrial strength.

  1. How far did the policies pursued by the government from 1906 -14 bring stability ...

    drew up an appeal urging the people of Russia to defy their government by not paying taxes and refusing conscription

  2. During his lifetime, Lenin made many important decisions and policies which affected every citizen ...

    it to accumulate large amounts of wealth for themselves which they had previously lost during the war. The April Theses was perhaps the most beneficial for the Russian economy and agriculture. An end to the war meant that raw materials and supplies could now be transported to the cities once

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work