• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did life improve for the following groups between 1949 and the early 1960s in Communist China: Women; Landlords and Businessmen; Peasants.

Extracts from this document...


How far did life improve for the following groups between 1949 and the early 1960s in Communist China: Women; Landlords and Businessmen; Peasants. The years of 1949-1960 in China were indeed 'Years of Great Change'. Who could have predicted a civil war, a Communist takeover, a complete turnaround in the land ownership system (and the economy in general) and the launch (and failure) of a near-Industrial Revolution? Mao and co heralded a headfirst launch into the twentieth century for China's governmental system, that's for sure. But amid all the "reforms", how much did life actually improve for the Chinese population? This essay aims to examine what reforms were made, and how they affected the peasants, women, landlords and businessmen of China. Before China's Communist "liberation", it had been ruled by Chiang Kaishek and the Guomindang. Their Nationalist regime had favoured the businessmen and landlords of China. Chiang Kaishek ruled as a dictator and had his army of "blueshirts" to enforce order, just like Hitler and Mussolini. By the late 1940s, however, his rule was starting to become unstable, with massive inflation causing poverty for many people in the cities. He realised that his regime was doomed, and retreated to the island of Taiwan, leaving the Communists to rule China. Nearly everyone, even the landlords and businessmen, would have been happy about any kind of takeover at the time, as everyone's future looked bleak under the collapsing Guomindang government. ...read more.


Mao and his ragtag band of Communist officials had the peasants' support, though. Many peasants supported the Communists already; after all, they were the original worker's party, and they had been very popular in the liberation areas, respecting the locals and trying out some reforms with regard to land and women with great success. The first step he took towards his agricultural revolution was by profiling all the peasants and teaching them how to sort themselves into the classes mentioned above. Land was then redistributed between the peasants evenly. This table illustrates how the land reform system changed: % houses % crop area owned Before After Landlords 2.6 28.7 2.1 Rich peasants 3.6 17.6 6.3 Middle peasants 35.8 30.2 44.8 Poor peasants and others 58.0 23.5 46.8 The Agrarian Reform Law turned the land ownership system on its head. Rich peasants lost land, poor peasants gained the rich peasants' lost land and middle peasants stayed roughly the same (the increase is due to the heavy imbalance between landlords and poor peasants; there was almost too much land to go round after the landlords had been stripped of their land). The peasants had troubles, however: they found that they hadn't enough money or equipment to cultivate the land. Mao suggested that peasants therefore organise themselves into Mutual Aid Teams, groups of peasants who would share each other's land and equipment. ...read more.


Mao Zedong really should have been forced to resign after this; indeed, if Chinese society had not been so utterly brainwashed I believe he would have. Instead, he was forced to step down slightly, but was still a very prominent figure. And, crucially yet unbelievably, he retained the public's support after all his crimes against them. The peasants were still with him. But I do not believe life got better for peasants under the Communists during the period I have described. An improved living standard cannot justify the removal of identity from an entire nation and a famine killing millions. I do not believe that the Communists did a lot of good for the vast majority of China. The only segment of Chinese society whose lives improved markedly were women, and when evaluating the importance of the reforms to end sexism, you have to take into account that most women were also peasants. So, whilst they were freed from being killed at birth and so on, they were also left to die later on in the famine, or through overwork, since women now had to work just as hard as men. The lives of landlords and businessmen could hardly be expected to get better under the Communists. However, perhaps they were unnecessarily cruel; execution hardly seems necessary. But Mao's regime's performance regarding peasants is unforgivable. A peasant-focused regime making thing worse for peasants is unforgivable, and life indeniably was worse for peasants by 1961. ?? ?? ?? ?? 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far were Maos agricultural policies responsible for the scale of the Great Famine ...

    5 star(s)

    Millions of peasants in the countryside were starving as the grain they cultivated was being taken away, leaving them with very little or no grain to feed from. Peasant life in the countryside was further worsened when families were broken up under the policy, which was Mao's intention.

  2. Why did the Communists come to power in China in 1949?

    Women were won around by the CCP as barbaric traditions such as foot-binding and arranged marriages were outlawed. The Red Army were also seen as a friendly and respectable defence force, their code of conduct stipulated that they were always to be courteous and honest with the peasants.

  1. Why did the Chinese Communist Party defeat the Guomindang?

    The march took them a year to complete as they travelled over 6,000 miles and cost them over 95% of their followers. They ended up in the Yanan Shaanxi province. As they marched the CCP liberated any peasants they found being poorly treated.

  2. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five year plan in 1958 and to ...

    The Agarian Reform Law of 1950 gave land to about 300 million peasants, About half of whom were able to farm their land by themselves. The rest, whose fields were too small or who did not own farming tools banded together in mutual-aid teams, sharing equipment and animals.

  1. Did Mao Create A Cruel Dictatorship ?

    Many false claims by Mao were now becoming apparent. And Mao was edged out of leadership by Deng Xio Ping and Lui Shao-qi. Who gave back the peasants their land. Mao resigned as president in 1959, however he remained as chairman of the CCP.

  2. To what extent do the sources agree that Russian government policy on agriculture consistently ...

    Although the source does disagree that this agricultural policy failed, its reliability should be questioned before it is taken into account. Source 4 describes the Virgin Land Schemes introduced by Khrushchev. There is no evidence of peasant resistance to the scheme in this source, and in fact portrays a positive

  1. The Long March is embedded deep in the psychology of the Chinese communist party. ...

    When there was no reply, they confiscated and destroyed 20,000 large chests of opium which amounted to a whole year's supply. At this stage, the British East India Company called in the help of the British army, which declared war on China and defeated them decisively in the war which lasted from 1839-1842.

  2. Russia: a Century of Upheaval.

    This led to a large number of very worried managers, as the targets were highly ambitious, intended to force Russia to progress in 10 years as much as Britain had in 100. On the whole the five-year plans where a great success, output increased 400% between 1928 and 1938.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work