• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did life improve for the following groups between 1949 and the early 1960s in Communist China: Women; Landlords and Businessmen; Peasants.

Extracts from this document...


How far did life improve for the following groups between 1949 and the early 1960s in Communist China: Women; Landlords and Businessmen; Peasants. The years of 1949-1960 in China were indeed 'Years of Great Change'. Who could have predicted a civil war, a Communist takeover, a complete turnaround in the land ownership system (and the economy in general) and the launch (and failure) of a near-Industrial Revolution? Mao and co heralded a headfirst launch into the twentieth century for China's governmental system, that's for sure. But amid all the "reforms", how much did life actually improve for the Chinese population? This essay aims to examine what reforms were made, and how they affected the peasants, women, landlords and businessmen of China. Before China's Communist "liberation", it had been ruled by Chiang Kaishek and the Guomindang. Their Nationalist regime had favoured the businessmen and landlords of China. Chiang Kaishek ruled as a dictator and had his army of "blueshirts" to enforce order, just like Hitler and Mussolini. By the late 1940s, however, his rule was starting to become unstable, with massive inflation causing poverty for many people in the cities. He realised that his regime was doomed, and retreated to the island of Taiwan, leaving the Communists to rule China. Nearly everyone, even the landlords and businessmen, would have been happy about any kind of takeover at the time, as everyone's future looked bleak under the collapsing Guomindang government. ...read more.


Mao and his ragtag band of Communist officials had the peasants' support, though. Many peasants supported the Communists already; after all, they were the original worker's party, and they had been very popular in the liberation areas, respecting the locals and trying out some reforms with regard to land and women with great success. The first step he took towards his agricultural revolution was by profiling all the peasants and teaching them how to sort themselves into the classes mentioned above. Land was then redistributed between the peasants evenly. This table illustrates how the land reform system changed: % houses % crop area owned Before After Landlords 2.6 28.7 2.1 Rich peasants 3.6 17.6 6.3 Middle peasants 35.8 30.2 44.8 Poor peasants and others 58.0 23.5 46.8 The Agrarian Reform Law turned the land ownership system on its head. Rich peasants lost land, poor peasants gained the rich peasants' lost land and middle peasants stayed roughly the same (the increase is due to the heavy imbalance between landlords and poor peasants; there was almost too much land to go round after the landlords had been stripped of their land). The peasants had troubles, however: they found that they hadn't enough money or equipment to cultivate the land. Mao suggested that peasants therefore organise themselves into Mutual Aid Teams, groups of peasants who would share each other's land and equipment. ...read more.


Mao Zedong really should have been forced to resign after this; indeed, if Chinese society had not been so utterly brainwashed I believe he would have. Instead, he was forced to step down slightly, but was still a very prominent figure. And, crucially yet unbelievably, he retained the public's support after all his crimes against them. The peasants were still with him. But I do not believe life got better for peasants under the Communists during the period I have described. An improved living standard cannot justify the removal of identity from an entire nation and a famine killing millions. I do not believe that the Communists did a lot of good for the vast majority of China. The only segment of Chinese society whose lives improved markedly were women, and when evaluating the importance of the reforms to end sexism, you have to take into account that most women were also peasants. So, whilst they were freed from being killed at birth and so on, they were also left to die later on in the famine, or through overwork, since women now had to work just as hard as men. The lives of landlords and businessmen could hardly be expected to get better under the Communists. However, perhaps they were unnecessarily cruel; execution hardly seems necessary. But Mao's regime's performance regarding peasants is unforgivable. A peasant-focused regime making thing worse for peasants is unforgivable, and life indeniably was worse for peasants by 1961. ?? ?? ?? ?? 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far were Maos agricultural policies responsible for the scale of the Great Famine ...

    5 star(s)

    Millions of peasants in the countryside were starving as the grain they cultivated was being taken away, leaving them with very little or no grain to feed from. Peasant life in the countryside was further worsened when families were broken up under the policy, which was Mao's intention.

  2. Why did the Communists come to power in China in 1949?

    Eighty-seven thousand Red Army soldiers set off from Jiangxi but many were killed and suffered badly on their march to another Soviet in the North of the country. Again, this does not seem like a reason for the CCP's eventual ascension to power in China, but the Long March brought much triumph to them.

  1. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five-year plan in 1958 and to what ...

    During he 'first five year plan' the peasants had been set up into lower and higher stage co-operatives, this was to share the workload. In the 'second five year plan' these co-operatives were developed into communes.

  2. Why did Mao Zedong introduce a second five year plan in 1958 and to ...

    and would seem to prove that the plan was successful, however the data could have been biased to keep the people of China happy. Many numbers of workers in the towns and cities meant more mouths to feed. The Five Year Plan also aimed to increase food output from China's farms by turning them into co-operatives.

  1. What social and economic changes did the Communists make when the came to power ...

    In addition, as farmers were producing more grain, to avoid food shortages they had to sell the Government 15-20% of their produce at a low price. China needed investment to fund their ever-growing country's needs. Mao went to the USSR to receive aid.

  2. Why did the Chinese Communist Party defeat the Guomindang?

    The march took them a year to complete as they travelled over 6,000 miles and cost them over 95% of their followers. They ended up in the Yanan Shaanxi province. As they marched the CCP liberated any peasants they found being poorly treated.

  1. During this piece of coursework I shall look at how China has changed since ...

    This was also not helped when at the end of the five year plan factory workers worried about possible punishments from the C.C.P for not reaching targets lied about overall production.This meant it took the C.C.P a long time to spot the problems.

  2. How Far Did Life Improve For Women, Landlords, Businessmen And Peasants Between 1949 And ...

    Mao implied his desire to abolish these antiquated principles in the Common Programme stating that, "women should enjoy equal rights with men..."3 justifying this with "women hold up half the sky"4. Then came the Marriage Law passed in April 1950.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work