• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'How far did the changes of the 1960s in Britain create a 'permissive society'?'

Extracts from this document...


'How far did the changes of the 1960s in Britain create a 'permissive society'?' Whilst there are slight variations amongst those who wish to define a permissive society, they all appear to agree it is a society of sexual liberation. From looking closely at the changes, for example new liberalising laws that were introduced such as the Abortion and Divorce Reform Act, it can be shown that 'sexual intercourse began in nineteen sixty-three' (Philip Larkin). The Abortion Act of 1967 legalised abortion in the United Kingdom up to 28 weeks gestation, however the question is what change this brought. When examining society prior to 1967 100,000-200,000 illegal abortion took place per year. Source C suggests that there wasn't a permissive society by claiming that although people had more freedom, they didn't use it, 'they did not necessarily exercise that freedom', however after legalisation the number of abortions increased from 35,000 a year in 1968 to 141,000 a year in 1975. ...read more.


However, in 1959 the Obscene Publications Act was passed and stated that in adult literature those which can be classed as 'in the interests of science, literature, art or learning' should be exempt from censorship. Therefore this allowed what had once been deemed shocking to become more acceptable, for example, the previously banned novel Lady Chatterley's Lover (which contained sexually explicit content) was allowed to be re-published. After the re-publication of Lady Chatterley's Lover censorship increasing worse away, for example pornographic novels such as Fanny Hill were published. Although source B suggests that the Obscene Publications Act was unpopular, 'unmitigated disaster', those against the Act were few in number and rising acceptance of the reduction of censorship in literature shows that society was becoming increasingly permissive. Due to the British Board of film censors, censorship lasted longer on screen and films were subject to strict categorisation. ...read more.


Before the 1960s women were encouraged to give up their job and personal independence when married or on the arrival of their first child and it was seen as their duty to be a good wife and mother. However, the introduction of the oral contraceptive pill and the Divorce Reform Act society became permissive. Women were able take away the inevitability of pregnancy and plan their lives, including careers. The Divorce Reform Act proved to show that marriage was becoming less important. Referring back to source C's claim that these changes did not create a permissive society due to people not using their freedom, 'they did not necessarily exercise that freedom', it can be shown that a permissive society was created due to these changes as the number of illegitimate births rose from 5.8 per cent to 8.2 per cent and as mentioned earlier, the number of marriages ending in divorce rose. As can be seen, due to an accumulation of reduced censorship and liberalising laws, there was a permissive society in Britain. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The author has a clear knowledge of the key legal changes that allowed for a permissive society but the central debate is missed; do these legal reforms reflect or create British society in the 1960s? Only one side of the debate is really addressed. 3 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 16/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. To what extent was Mary, Queen of Scots the major cause of instability in ...

    Crucially, they accepted Elizabeth as Supreme Governor of the Church and so caused no instability. The Separatists wanted every congregation to be independent and rule its self; therefore they threatened Elizabeth and her desire for England to have a single consistent Church.

  2. How far do you agree that Chamberlain's behaviour during the Czech crisis of September ...

    The time was also used to create an extensive radar network, and to improve Britain's technology to perhaps prevent the bomber getting through. Source 8 states that Hitler resented his own failure to control czechoslavakia, and that Chamberlain was pleased with what he was able to achieve.

  1. ' But everyman has his price.' Show the part that corruption plays in the ...

    The power he has means that if someone were to oppose him, he would simply dispose of them. Henry uses the word traitor because traitors are executed. All this fails to persuade More, his moral stand is too strong. He is trying to emphasise what a good king he is by showing what he is doing is for his country.

  2. The Reformation was the intellectual movement in Western Europe in the 16th century which ...

    King Henry noticed that the church owned land accounted for 20% of England's mass, and that it received money from the public, strengthening his greed for personal wealth and power. With the expertise of Cromwell, a series of acts to cut back papal power and influence in England were passed,

  1. 'George Stephenson was the most important reason for the building of The Manchester to ...

    The Mersey and Irwell Canal was 43 miles long and carried imported goods such as grain, stone, timber and coal. However the canal journey could take up to36 hours depending on the tide, wind and storms and nearer Manchester, the canal sometimes suffered from lack of water in the river.

  2. How far do you agree with the view that cultural imperialism was the main ...

    In addition, the âFashoda incidentâ reinforces my argument, as it almost led to war between rivals France and Britain, and illustrates the extent Britain was prepared to go to, in order to protect their interests in an area which represented âunexploited marketâ2.

  1. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    going for 3 and a half years and the elections were usually held every 7 years, King George III argued that he could hold an election and that it wasnât unconstitutional, there was no law saying he couldnât. Pitt successfully achieved an overall majority in the March elections, having 315

  2. Using your own knowledge to access how far the sources support the interpretation that ...

    Similarly in source B we are shown that the Radicals blamed their failures on the government and their spies. When Turner a conspirator of the Pentrich rising says that âOliver brought him to thisâ, it makes it sound like Oliver, like Edwards, acted as an agents provocateur and encouraged them to take action.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work