Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3

How far did the policies pursued by the government from 1906 -14 bring stability to Russia?

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Following the survival of the Russian government through the 1905 revolution, Russia was still extremely unstable. Even though concessions had been made - such as the allowance of a constitutional Duma, and the abolition of mortgage repayments - citizens were still very unlikely to trust and keep satisfied with the Tsarist government, however, these such concessions did promote some stability amongst the citizens as it divided the opposition, so the Tsar's opponent was lessened with parties such as the liberals being satisfied with the Duma. This still engraved anger seems to have some meaning when the Tsar introduces his Fundamental Laws, in just when the Duma was introduced - this law stated that the Tsar had 'Supreme Autocratic power', therefore, he was all powerful within the state of Russia, which completely eliminates the power of the Duma, as the choices will still be made - like before - by the incompetent viewed Tsar and his government. Moreover, the power of the Duma is yet again tarnished and decreased by the placement of a state Duma which has the power of veto, alongside with the citizens' Duma.

Middle

orders - and of course, with no tax, there will be little money, and with no soldiers, the defence of Russia would have been severely low. The effects of the appeal was not as one would expect of a national response to this appeal, but rather an unorganised, scattered, acts of violence, which still severely affects the Tsarist government. There was however, a "solution" to this problem, which the Tsar sought to do - the introduction of Stolypin into the scene as chief minister showed promise when he got to work quelling the resistors and violent activists by arresting and executions by the introduction of Marital Law - giving the courts more power - the huge amount of over 2,500 executions from the years of 1906 to 19011, earned him the phrase "Stolypin's necktie". His severe policy of repression upon the citizens did induce some stability upon Russia, however, from his assassination and increased disturbances in 1911, it is clear that some people thought otherwise than him.

Conclusion

The Tsar had however learned from his past mistakes, and by this, it means he allowed Stolypin to introduce new electoral laws which limited the vote to the propertied classes. The procedure of the voting took was set as only 1 in 6 of the male population could vote - the peasants and industrial workers were virtually excluded; which meant that the new and third Duma was made up of mainly right wing candidates, which also meant that they were completely for the Tsar and the Tsarist government, which meant once again the citizens were ignored, and the Tsar could pass any laws easily, swiftly, and with no opposition. This repetition of the phase which already angered the citizens so is pretty stupid of the Tsar, and with more anger dwelling amongst the citizens, it was not long until the Stolypin's assassination in 1911 occurred, and further incompetence further inflicted more instability within Russia. ?? ?? ?? ?? How far did the policies pursued by the government from 1906 -14 bring stability to Russia? 2007 1

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    After 1931 most people were paid by piecework, yet average income was probably about 50% of that in 1928. * There were severe shortages, so queuing was a way of life. Fresh foods were often not available. * Most people ate meals in the communal canteens at their place of work rather than cook at home.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Was it the policies pursued by Henry VIII that caused "the mid-Tudor crisis"?

    4 star(s)

    Government under Henry VIII had been strong, and he had managed Parliament relatively well - but this was due to his force of personality and the same system, whereby the power of the monarch was based in Parliament, was not workable with a king who was only a minor, and a weaker leader, such as Somerset.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.