• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did the policies pursued by the government from 1906 -14 bring stability to Russia?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Following the survival of the Russian government through the 1905 revolution, Russia was still extremely unstable. Even though concessions had been made - such as the allowance of a constitutional Duma, and the abolition of mortgage repayments - citizens were still very unlikely to trust and keep satisfied with the Tsarist government, however, these such concessions did promote some stability amongst the citizens as it divided the opposition, so the Tsar's opponent was lessened with parties such as the liberals being satisfied with the Duma. This still engraved anger seems to have some meaning when the Tsar introduces his Fundamental Laws, in just when the Duma was introduced - this law stated that the Tsar had 'Supreme Autocratic power', therefore, he was all powerful within the state of Russia, which completely eliminates the power of the Duma, as the choices will still be made - like before - by the incompetent viewed Tsar and his government. Moreover, the power of the Duma is yet again tarnished and decreased by the placement of a state Duma which has the power of veto, alongside with the citizens' Duma. ...read more.

Middle

orders - and of course, with no tax, there will be little money, and with no soldiers, the defence of Russia would have been severely low. The effects of the appeal was not as one would expect of a national response to this appeal, but rather an unorganised, scattered, acts of violence, which still severely affects the Tsarist government. There was however, a "solution" to this problem, which the Tsar sought to do - the introduction of Stolypin into the scene as chief minister showed promise when he got to work quelling the resistors and violent activists by arresting and executions by the introduction of Marital Law - giving the courts more power - the huge amount of over 2,500 executions from the years of 1906 to 19011, earned him the phrase "Stolypin's necktie". His severe policy of repression upon the citizens did induce some stability upon Russia, however, from his assassination and increased disturbances in 1911, it is clear that some people thought otherwise than him. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Tsar had however learned from his past mistakes, and by this, it means he allowed Stolypin to introduce new electoral laws which limited the vote to the propertied classes. The procedure of the voting took was set as only 1 in 6 of the male population could vote - the peasants and industrial workers were virtually excluded; which meant that the new and third Duma was made up of mainly right wing candidates, which also meant that they were completely for the Tsar and the Tsarist government, which meant once again the citizens were ignored, and the Tsar could pass any laws easily, swiftly, and with no opposition. This repetition of the phase which already angered the citizens so is pretty stupid of the Tsar, and with more anger dwelling amongst the citizens, it was not long until the Stolypin's assassination in 1911 occurred, and further incompetence further inflicted more instability within Russia. ?? ?? ?? ?? How far did the policies pursued by the government from 1906 -14 bring stability to Russia? 2007 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was it the policies pursued by Henry VIII that caused "the mid-Tudor crisis"?

    4 star(s)

    There was much rivalry between factions which prevented the government from being as united as it could have been on Henry's death. From this struggle for power, Somerset emerged as leader. It is evident that he did not have enough support in the government, as he had to resort to the use of proclamations.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    Anyway, it was essential to have some grain stored in case there was a bad harvest the next year. * Most peasants were basically conservative. They had supported the Bolsheviks in order to get rid of their landlords and to get their hands on land.

  1. How significant was Piotr Stolypin in attempting to strengthen Tsarism between 1906 and 1911?

    reforms were not being paid the attention he wished for and werenât passed. But the meeting with the Kadets suggests that there were also âpolitical considerations[8]â to strengthen his reputation and also the monarchyâs. Stolypin was deadly serious about bringing justice sixteen of the âmost guilty[9]â out of the fifty-five

  2. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    The harvest of 1931 and the subsequent three harvests were poor because of the weather and the heavy procurements demanded by the Communist Government to feed the growing urban population[21]: from 26 million in 1930 to 40 million in 1932.[22] Thus as a result the government left the peasant families

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work