• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did the policies pursued by the government from 1906 -14 bring stability to Russia?

Extracts from this document...


Following the survival of the Russian government through the 1905 revolution, Russia was still extremely unstable. Even though concessions had been made - such as the allowance of a constitutional Duma, and the abolition of mortgage repayments - citizens were still very unlikely to trust and keep satisfied with the Tsarist government, however, these such concessions did promote some stability amongst the citizens as it divided the opposition, so the Tsar's opponent was lessened with parties such as the liberals being satisfied with the Duma. This still engraved anger seems to have some meaning when the Tsar introduces his Fundamental Laws, in just when the Duma was introduced - this law stated that the Tsar had 'Supreme Autocratic power', therefore, he was all powerful within the state of Russia, which completely eliminates the power of the Duma, as the choices will still be made - like before - by the incompetent viewed Tsar and his government. Moreover, the power of the Duma is yet again tarnished and decreased by the placement of a state Duma which has the power of veto, alongside with the citizens' Duma. ...read more.


orders - and of course, with no tax, there will be little money, and with no soldiers, the defence of Russia would have been severely low. The effects of the appeal was not as one would expect of a national response to this appeal, but rather an unorganised, scattered, acts of violence, which still severely affects the Tsarist government. There was however, a "solution" to this problem, which the Tsar sought to do - the introduction of Stolypin into the scene as chief minister showed promise when he got to work quelling the resistors and violent activists by arresting and executions by the introduction of Marital Law - giving the courts more power - the huge amount of over 2,500 executions from the years of 1906 to 19011, earned him the phrase "Stolypin's necktie". His severe policy of repression upon the citizens did induce some stability upon Russia, however, from his assassination and increased disturbances in 1911, it is clear that some people thought otherwise than him. ...read more.


The Tsar had however learned from his past mistakes, and by this, it means he allowed Stolypin to introduce new electoral laws which limited the vote to the propertied classes. The procedure of the voting took was set as only 1 in 6 of the male population could vote - the peasants and industrial workers were virtually excluded; which meant that the new and third Duma was made up of mainly right wing candidates, which also meant that they were completely for the Tsar and the Tsarist government, which meant once again the citizens were ignored, and the Tsar could pass any laws easily, swiftly, and with no opposition. This repetition of the phase which already angered the citizens so is pretty stupid of the Tsar, and with more anger dwelling amongst the citizens, it was not long until the Stolypin's assassination in 1911 occurred, and further incompetence further inflicted more instability within Russia. ?? ?? ?? ?? How far did the policies pursued by the government from 1906 -14 bring stability to Russia? 2007 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was it the policies pursued by Henry VIII that caused "the mid-Tudor crisis"?

    4 star(s)

    Government under Henry VIII had been strong, and he had managed Parliament relatively well - but this was due to his force of personality and the same system, whereby the power of the monarch was based in Parliament, was not workable with a king who was only a minor, and a weaker leader, such as Somerset.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    1927 1932 1939 coal (millions of tons) 35 64 145 oil (millions of tons) 12 21.4 40 iron ore(millions of tons) 6 12.1 32 Changing social policies How did the standard of living change? * There is no doubt that the standard of living fell for most ordinary Russians during the 1930s.

  1. Compare the impact of Stolypin and Rasputin on the stability of the tsar(TM)s government ...

    go to heaven, these views caused his pleasures to include drunkenness, stealing and womanising, and on top of all this, he claimed to be a holy man. People of Russia had little respect for him and many questioned why someone like the tsar, who was supposed to be in control

  2. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    peasants wouldn?t have been forced to sell more grain in order to buy commodities; leaving many with no reserves of seed-corn.[58] 350,000 died as a result either from starvation or disease.[59] The concern of the elite, though, had been demonstrated: Zemstvo leaders, local gentry and the national government had all

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work