Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3

How far did the Supreme Court hinder rather than help the development of African American civil rights in the period 1865-1980 By James Lawson

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Between 1865 and 1980, the Supreme Court had a significant effect on the progress of civil rights. Early on in the period, numerous rulings were made that fundamentally restricted the rights of recently freed African Americans and limited their progress with a harmful legally supported precedence that would be set for years to come. However, the Supreme Court also helped develop the rights of African Americans, by steadily striking down harmful laws, and later in the period, by actively supporting federal intervention and desegregation. Despite a wave of positive federal legislation to support civil rights, including the abolition of slavery and the 14th and 15th Amendments, the Supreme Court notably hindered the progress of African American rights between 1865 and the early 1900s. The Supreme Court, directly countered progress made through this period and congressional reconstruction, most likely with the intention of hindering progress. The Cruickshank decision ruled that the 14th Amendment protected the rights and privileges of citizens only when they were infringed by the action of the state. As a result, it essentially made the 14th amendment void, when individuals and groups perpetrated racial crimes. This is also meant that these basic rights would not be the target of federal intervention and thus the court had an extremely negative impact. ...read more.

Middle

This acted as one of the first major positive changes by the Supreme Court, following a period of inaction and a period of hindrance. Between 1944 and 1948, significant rulings were made for the cause of civil rights, against desegregation and unfair voting practices; the first steps towards later reversals. The Democratic Party's use of all white primaries in states such as Texas were overturned in the case of Smith V. Allwright. In two other rulings, Morgan V Virginia and Shell V Kraemer the Supreme court ruled that Virginia state law enforcing segregation was illegal and that racially restrictive covenants were not valid as they violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. As a result, it is clear that the role of the Supreme Court had shifted from one of hindrance to positive help for civil rights. Conversely, it must be noted that most progress made was simply undermining the Supreme Court's lasting harmful past rulings. Thus the court only helped to the extent that they were reverting their own past hindrances rather than actively furthering the condition of African American civil rights. This trend continued, with significant decisions by the Supreme Court, challenging the past set notion of separate but equal. For example, in 1950, the decisions following Sweatt V. Painter and McLaurin V. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, during this phase, the Supreme Court continued its positive role for civil rights. In the case of Swann v Charlotte-Mecklenburg, the court ruled provided an active mechanism against underlying segregation. By busing people to schools, it ensured that integration in public schools could take place. Also, The Supreme Court ruled that school-financing based on local property taxes was not a constitutional violation of the 14th Amendment. Overall, it is clear that the Supreme Court was not simply a body that hindered progress, especially from 1960 onwards as its role and action expanded. However, the initial laws and ruling made by the court between 1865 and 1900 were so damaging, that it would take over 50 years to revert them truly. They provided the basis for, and legally enforced, a system of segregation, unequal treatment, and limited civil rights. Following this and until the late 1960s, whilst the court no longer directly hindered change, and became a helpful positive force, the overall assessment must remain negative as it was simply undoing its own harmful legislation. Therefore, despite positive transformation, the Supreme Court's impact over the period, was one of hindrance and largely negative. ?? ?? ?? ?? How far did the Supreme Court hinder rather than help the development of African American civil rights in the period 1865-1980 By James Lawson ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the significance of the role of individuals in reducing racial discrimination in the ...

    5 star(s)

    The introduction of the Quota System meant that employers and universities had to take on a certain percentage of African Americans, and the situation for black Americans began to rapidly improve.

  2. Assess the view that Booker T. Washington was the most important leader in the ...

    political change like Du Bois, he alienated white support â unlike Washington, and he thought it was too late to return to Africa, unlike Garvey. Malcolm X created conflict at a time when Martin Luther King began his successful campaign of non-violence and equality â the approach Washington was taking at the beginning of the period.

  1. In considering the development of the USA in the years 1815-1917, how far can ...

    But the American ambition arguably was triggered by the union victory revealing it 30 years later overseas. In conclusion the union victory transformed America through factors that contributed massively, to the development of USA in the years 1815-1917. Distinctively the economic growth accelerated even more after the union victory it

  2. How accurate is it to say there was significant progress towards racial inequality in ...

    stopped Black people from voting. In 1947,17.3% of black people could vote in new orleans - but many were stopped because of sheer intimidation. More over in the North - where arguably politically barriers were not present, poverty of black voters often stopped them from voting.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent did the US president hinder rather than help the development of ...

    3 star(s)

    Although he insisted on the south ratifying the 13th Amendment, he then allowed them to develop their own âBlack Codesâ. This discriminated against African Americans and prevented them from voting with clauses as the âGrandfather Clauseâ. These clauses allowed only Black people with literate skills to vote, knowing full well

  2. Peer reviewed

    Assess the view that the Supreme Court was the most important branch of federal ...

    4 star(s)

    formalised segregation in many southern states, making it clear that public areas should not be segregated, and that equal rights for all still applied in those areas. This act was, however, declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, beginning with their ruling in the case of US v.

  1. To what extent was WW2 the most significant turning point for civil rights

    introduced a new method of Black Nationalism and violence in response to white oppression. This did little to further the social standing of blacks, apart from perhaps create a sense of fear amongst white communities, and also by no means convinced law makers of the necessity of civil rights but

  2. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    In 1942 CORE the congress of Racial Equality was set up, which later became active in the civil rights campaign. There was still a lot of discrimination, but Roosevelt tried to help by awarding government contracts to firms that ended discrimination in the workplace.

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.