• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did Truman and Eisenhower increase US involvement in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far did Truman and Eisenhower increase US involvement in Vietnam? Vietnam is an Asian country to the east of the Indochina Peninsula. From 1946 to 1954 the Vietnamese people were under French rule, and the Vietnamese struggled for independence. In 1954 the French left, and Vietnam was temporarily divided in two, Communist north and Capitalist south. The Americans quickly moved into help the anti-communists of the south. There are several reasons for the increased US involvement, some involving Truman and Eisenhower and others that are not related to the two presidents. In order for the topic to be fully explored and the question to be answered; the actions that Truman and Eisenhower took must be compared to other factors that affected the US involvement in Vietnam. Areas such as; the domino theory, the stalemate theory, the quagmire theory will be covered. ...read more.

Middle

In one of Truman's speeches he said "We are gradually increasing our stake in the outcome of the struggle...we are dangerously close to the point of being so deeply committed to direct intervention. These situations, unfortunately, have a way of snowballing." This shows that Truman had given the Vietnam War serious consideration and thought, he was cautious about his actions and to a certain extent he was careful with his actions. Eisenhower feared that if Indo-China fell to communisms that the surrounding countries would follow, this is similar to Kennedy's statement of Vietnam being the cornerstone of containment. This was called the domino effect because the Americans believed that the surrounding countries would fall to communism one by one in a similar fashion to dominoes. Eisenhower continued Truman's policy of giving aid to the French because he believed that the USA had to give some support to the French. ...read more.

Conclusion

Diem was what America called 'the best of a bad bunch', he wasn't the most popular Prime minister, he was Catholic in a predominantly Buddhist country. It seemed as if he had no compassion for the peasants, and it looked as if he abused his power to give jobs to his family. Many people opposed the government of Diem. It would seem that Eisenhower's decisions led to a downward spiral of knock-on effects that resulted in America being heavily involved in the Vietnam situation, although he kept on Truman's policy. It would seem as though Truman and Eisenhower increased US involvement considerably. It was for this reason that they suffered a lot of opposition through the media, people of America and advisors. The Truman doctrine played a vital role in both Presidents careers as well as the many others that succeeded them such as kennedy, Johnson and even Nixon. Eisenhower was more passive that Truman, but this doesn't meant that he shouldn't be held equally responsible for the situation in Vietnam. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. How and why did Eisenhower increased commitment to Vietnam

    America also helped in transporting one million northern Vietnamese into the south; most of the refugees were catholic and supporters of Diem. By 1960, Eisenhower had given over a billion dollar to support Diem's government which was rapidly deteriorating due to his oppressive and unpopular administration.

  2. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    He also gave funding for poor college students, including grants, work-study money, and government loans. Medical Care Act 1965 Millions of elderly people were aided by the 1965 Medicare amendment to the Social Security Act. Poor people received federal money for medical care through the Medicaid program The Poor He

  1. Comparison of Presidents Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower and Lyndon Johnson

    In January,1948, an election year, Truman addressed congress and the entire nation on this same subject in his State of the Union speech. During this speech, he stated that the first goal of the government should be "secure fully the essential human rights of our citizens."3 He claimed that discrimination

  2. Was Vietnam Kennedy or Johnson's War?

    It is argued that Kennedy intended to withdraw the US from South Vietnam before he was assassinated in November 1963. If this would have happened then the war would have been Kennedy's war as it would have been over before Johnson even made president.

  1. Why were the Liberals defeated in the general election of 1874?

    On this assumption, he initiated a triumvirate of reforms that were to become perhaps the most famous of his reforms. (Morrogh, 2001, p. 20) With the intention of winning the hearts and minds of the Irish, he focussed his reforms on a three-pronged strategy, consisting of religion, land and education.

  2. Assess the reasons why American military intervention in Vietnam increased from 1954

    The burning Buddhist monk protesting against the policies of the Catholic and pro-American Diem just shows how much people opposed Diems rule. To the rest of the world it looked as if the US were backing the wrong leader and, when the

  1. 'Johnson alone bears the responsibility for the escalation of war in Vietnam in the ...

    This was because as soon as JFK was assassinated he was martyred and JFK also said that if the USA stood up to communism, it will stand down. So all LBJ was getting was the same advice JFK was getting, but because it was 4 years in, and he wasn?t

  2. How far was the USAs military involvement in Korea a desire to defend democracy?

    to both the north and south of Korea, and ending in the USA basically placing Rhee into place. Secondly it was not only the creation of Rhee?s government that was not democratic, but also how Rhee?s government ruled South Korea and how it turned out.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work