• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did Truman and Eisenhower increase US involvement in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far did Truman and Eisenhower increase US involvement in Vietnam? Vietnam is an Asian country to the east of the Indochina Peninsula. From 1946 to 1954 the Vietnamese people were under French rule, and the Vietnamese struggled for independence. In 1954 the French left, and Vietnam was temporarily divided in two, Communist north and Capitalist south. The Americans quickly moved into help the anti-communists of the south. There are several reasons for the increased US involvement, some involving Truman and Eisenhower and others that are not related to the two presidents. In order for the topic to be fully explored and the question to be answered; the actions that Truman and Eisenhower took must be compared to other factors that affected the US involvement in Vietnam. Areas such as; the domino theory, the stalemate theory, the quagmire theory will be covered. ...read more.

Middle

In one of Truman's speeches he said "We are gradually increasing our stake in the outcome of the struggle...we are dangerously close to the point of being so deeply committed to direct intervention. These situations, unfortunately, have a way of snowballing." This shows that Truman had given the Vietnam War serious consideration and thought, he was cautious about his actions and to a certain extent he was careful with his actions. Eisenhower feared that if Indo-China fell to communisms that the surrounding countries would follow, this is similar to Kennedy's statement of Vietnam being the cornerstone of containment. This was called the domino effect because the Americans believed that the surrounding countries would fall to communism one by one in a similar fashion to dominoes. Eisenhower continued Truman's policy of giving aid to the French because he believed that the USA had to give some support to the French. ...read more.

Conclusion

Diem was what America called 'the best of a bad bunch', he wasn't the most popular Prime minister, he was Catholic in a predominantly Buddhist country. It seemed as if he had no compassion for the peasants, and it looked as if he abused his power to give jobs to his family. Many people opposed the government of Diem. It would seem that Eisenhower's decisions led to a downward spiral of knock-on effects that resulted in America being heavily involved in the Vietnam situation, although he kept on Truman's policy. It would seem as though Truman and Eisenhower increased US involvement considerably. It was for this reason that they suffered a lot of opposition through the media, people of America and advisors. The Truman doctrine played a vital role in both Presidents careers as well as the many others that succeeded them such as kennedy, Johnson and even Nixon. Eisenhower was more passive that Truman, but this doesn't meant that he shouldn't be held equally responsible for the situation in Vietnam. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Comparison of Presidents Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower and Lyndon Johnson

    counters the ideals of democracy and successful action needs to be taken. He further pushed the ideas of the Committee of Civil Rights that had been rejected by congress, and said that desegregation needed to be put into action. That same year, Truman followed the ideas of his State of

  2. Was Vietnam Kennedy or Johnson's War?

    On this account, the Vietnam War was not Kennedy's war as he personally wasn't totally agreed to it and the war didn't affect him personally as much as it did with President Johnson. If it was anyone's war at this time it would have been Kennedy's advisors who were hungry for war.

  1. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    Eventually 70,000 took part and 3,600 went to jail. The violence was seen on TV and attracted widespread sympathy. 1960 in Nashville. 500 students began protests which resulted in the desegregation of the town 1961 CORE began the "Freedom Rides" which were attempts to force the desegregation of busses.

  2. Why did the US get involved in Vietnam in 1965?

    and secondly it is a lot easier to gain support for the war with the majority of the population pro-invasion. The next factor that made the USA invade Vietnam is the Americans foreign policy. One reason why they got involved in Vietnam was because of S.E.A.T.O, South East Asia Treaty Organisation, which was established in September 1954.

  1. Why were the Liberals defeated in the general election of 1874?

    series of reforms, their very raison d' etre, which perhaps explains why the electoral verdict of 1874 threw up such a dramatically different result. Part III: General discussion: Perhaps Gladstone's policy in Ireland was to contribute to the defeat of the Liberals in 1874 like no other.

  2. 'Johnson alone bears the responsibility for the escalation of war in Vietnam in the ...

    LBJ was only given one option ? war. The military said that they can win the war and they said that Operation Rolling Thunder would work and be over in a couple of months. LBJ couldn?t really tell them what to do, or say that they?re wrong, because he isn?t

  1. To what extent did the Domino Theory cause continued US support for South Korea ...

    Being a democrat, Truman was often viewed as taking a soft approach to the problems facing America. Hence, with an upcoming election year in 1952, Truman needed to show the American public that he was going to take a hardline stance against the spread of communism.

  2. How far was the USAs military involvement in Korea a desire to defend democracy?

    to both the north and south of Korea, and ending in the USA basically placing Rhee into place. Secondly it was not only the creation of Rhee?s government that was not democratic, but also how Rhee?s government ruled South Korea and how it turned out.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work