• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far did Truman and Eisenhower increase US involvement in Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...


How far did Truman and Eisenhower increase US involvement in Vietnam? Vietnam is an Asian country to the east of the Indochina Peninsula. From 1946 to 1954 the Vietnamese people were under French rule, and the Vietnamese struggled for independence. In 1954 the French left, and Vietnam was temporarily divided in two, Communist north and Capitalist south. The Americans quickly moved into help the anti-communists of the south. There are several reasons for the increased US involvement, some involving Truman and Eisenhower and others that are not related to the two presidents. In order for the topic to be fully explored and the question to be answered; the actions that Truman and Eisenhower took must be compared to other factors that affected the US involvement in Vietnam. Areas such as; the domino theory, the stalemate theory, the quagmire theory will be covered. ...read more.


In one of Truman's speeches he said "We are gradually increasing our stake in the outcome of the struggle...we are dangerously close to the point of being so deeply committed to direct intervention. These situations, unfortunately, have a way of snowballing." This shows that Truman had given the Vietnam War serious consideration and thought, he was cautious about his actions and to a certain extent he was careful with his actions. Eisenhower feared that if Indo-China fell to communisms that the surrounding countries would follow, this is similar to Kennedy's statement of Vietnam being the cornerstone of containment. This was called the domino effect because the Americans believed that the surrounding countries would fall to communism one by one in a similar fashion to dominoes. Eisenhower continued Truman's policy of giving aid to the French because he believed that the USA had to give some support to the French. ...read more.


Diem was what America called 'the best of a bad bunch', he wasn't the most popular Prime minister, he was Catholic in a predominantly Buddhist country. It seemed as if he had no compassion for the peasants, and it looked as if he abused his power to give jobs to his family. Many people opposed the government of Diem. It would seem that Eisenhower's decisions led to a downward spiral of knock-on effects that resulted in America being heavily involved in the Vietnam situation, although he kept on Truman's policy. It would seem as though Truman and Eisenhower increased US involvement considerably. It was for this reason that they suffered a lot of opposition through the media, people of America and advisors. The Truman doctrine played a vital role in both Presidents careers as well as the many others that succeeded them such as kennedy, Johnson and even Nixon. Eisenhower was more passive that Truman, but this doesn't meant that he shouldn't be held equally responsible for the situation in Vietnam. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level History of the USA, 1840-1968 essays

  1. Why did the US get involved in Vietnam in 1965?

    and secondly it is a lot easier to gain support for the war with the majority of the population pro-invasion. The next factor that made the USA invade Vietnam is the Americans foreign policy. One reason why they got involved in Vietnam was because of S.E.A.T.O, South East Asia Treaty Organisation, which was established in September 1954.

  2. Why were the Liberals defeated in the general election of 1874?

    It had particularly alienated the progressive middle class groups. (Sturmthal, 1953, p. 76) It was this set of factors that had helped accentuate the Liberals' radical character. Thus, the Liberals had taken office in circumstances of strength. However, once in power under the premiership of Gladstone, they bungled up a

  1. Was Vietnam Kennedy or Johnson's War?

    from that effort, would mean a collapse not only of South Vietnam but South East Asia, so we are going to stay there.' Even though Kennedy had a commitment to South Vietnam, it cannot be called his war as he was nowhere near as involved in the war as Johnson was.

  2. Comparison of Presidents Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower and Lyndon Johnson

    In January,1948, an election year, Truman addressed congress and the entire nation on this same subject in his State of the Union speech. During this speech, he stated that the first goal of the government should be "secure fully the essential human rights of our citizens."3 He claimed that discrimination

  1. Revision notes - the USA 1945 to 1980

    1952, he was elected to the U.S. Senate and married socialite Jacqueline Bouvier in 1953. Jackie was a great asset to Kennedy, adding a touch of glamour to his campaigns, and becoming a fashion icon of her day. Kennedy was very good on television and was one of the first

  2. 'Johnson alone bears the responsibility for the escalation of war in Vietnam in the ...

    elected in at first, he inherits the administration and government, he simply can?t shift it because it is the best advice he can get and if it seems that LBJ was getting rid of all the people advising JFK, the people wouldn?t like it because they thought that they were good.

  1. To what extent did the Domino Theory cause continued US support for South Korea ...

    Being a democrat, Truman was often viewed as taking a soft approach to the problems facing America. Hence, with an upcoming election year in 1952, Truman needed to show the American public that he was going to take a hardline stance against the spread of communism.

  2. How far was the USAs military involvement in Korea a desire to defend democracy?

    to both the north and south of Korea, and ending in the USA basically placing Rhee into place. Secondly it was not only the creation of Rhee?s government that was not democratic, but also how Rhee?s government ruled South Korea and how it turned out.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work