• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do Sources 2 and 3 challenge the view given in Source 1 that the officers commanding the British Army in the Crimean War were unfit for the position

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do Sources 2 and 3 challenge the view given in Source 1 that the officers commanding the British Army in the Crimean War were unfit for the position? Sources 2 and 3 both agree with each other as they are giving a similar impression that the officers commanding the British Army were being unfairly criticised throughout the Crimean War. Source 2 was part of a judges summing case supporting the Earl of Cardigan who had commanded the Light Brigade at Balaclava. The source states that any criticism of Cardigan should be ?generous and sympathetic? and gives the impression that he was a courageous officer as the judge stated ?not one that should seek to cast a stain upon his courage and his personal honour as an officer?. Source 3 supports Source 2 as it suggests that the staff were being ?unfairly criticised? and that there is ?no staff officer to whom I would object?. As Source 2 states that Cardigan has ?courage and personal honour? this is similar in Source 3 as he describes the Army with a high ?sense of duty?. ...read more.

Middle

Source 1 could be seen as inaccurate as it was book that was published in 1903 by Wolseley who went on to become a Commander-in-Chief of the British Army and serves as a Captain in the Royal Engineers during the Crimean War. Although Wolseley was there during the time period it could be seen as biased as it is only one man?s version of events. It was also published 47 years after the Crimean war had ended so what was written was simply memoirs which may have been inaccurate as they were written such a long time after the event, the author could have got some things incorrect or forgotten specific things. Source 1 is also taken from a book, which could have been created for a purpose such as to entertain which means it could be unreliable. Similarly to Source 1, Source 2 was after the Crimean War. Source 2 was a judge?s speech in which Cardigan had sued an author for criticising him, however this was 7 years after the Crimean War had ended so some details may again have been inaccurate. ...read more.

Conclusion

Crimean War were unfit for position as they both suggest that the officers were being ?unfairly criticised? whereas Source 1 states that they were ?unfit for the positions?. Although Source 1 was written after the given time period, I believe it is the most useful as from my own knowledge I know that sales of commissions was a big issue during the Crimean War as it allowed people to be appointed to positions without relevant experience. I also know that there were many problems with the officers during the Crimean War and Sir Garnet Wolseley was there to witness these events. Although General Simpson from Source 3 was present at the time, he may have been told by the British Government not to report badly about the Army as it would further the bad press about them, which makes the source not as useful as Source 1. Source 2 is the least useful source out of the three as it is a judge?s speech, who was not there at the time and would have not had an accurate view of the officers during the Crimean War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. The changing position of women and the suffrage question. Revision notes

    * Arguably, the WSPU leadership tried to restrain the enthusiasms of its rank and file for ever-increasing violent tactics. Disputes within the Militancy movement Example 1 ? Summer 1907 * Charlotte Despard and Teresa Billington-Grieg became increasingly concerned by the WSPU?s cultivation of middle and upper class women with money

  2. How far do Sources 2 and 3 challenge the impression of the Land League ...

    The use of the word ?terrorism? gives us the impression that actually the Land League were an extremist group even though in Source 2, a propaganda poster where the Land League states its aims, the League suggests that they use ?Temperate but firm resistance to oppression and injustice? which gives

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work