• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources suggest that Captain Nolan was to blame for the disastrous charge by the Light Brigade at Balaclava?

Extracts from this document...


[history homework] How far do the sources suggest that Captain Nolan was to blame for the disastrous charge by the Light Brigade at Balaclava? Having analysed all three sources it can be said that sources disagree to a considerable extent with the statement that Captain Nolan was to blame for the disastrous charge of the Light Brigade. Source 1 strongly disagrees and challenges the statement, as it states that the ?blame was hastily attached? to Nolan initially suggesting that he had been used as a scapegoat for the blame as he had died during the charge, allowing the commanding officers to plant the blame on him. However it states that these claims of Nolan being responsible were ?alleged? and he had ?been subsequently rescued from so grave an accusation?. The source goes on to make its own claims that his ?published theories on tactics? were of a totally different nature to the ones that were used in the charge and therefore it could not have been his fault as ?he could never have suggested it, even under an access of enthusiasm?. ...read more.


the eager spirit of Captain Nolan, then Lucan was to blame?, while suggesting this it does show some doubt with the use of the word ?if?. This source supports source 1?s comment that he was ?enthusiastic? corroborating with Source 2?s comment that he had and ?eager spirit?. Source 2 further comments that Lord Lucan should possess ?sufficient self-command? as a commanding officer, further agreeing with Source 1. The source is an extract of a letter written by the father of one of the survivors of the charge of the light brigade, which was published in the Examiner Newspaper from the time, which can be said to be some of its values as it has a credible Source of information as the Fathers son was actually there to witness the events, and it was from the time published in a reliable newspaper. The purpose of the letter seems to be to relieve Captain Nolan?s blame and put the blame on Lord Lucan. However the Source has some limitations, since the father was not there his actual knowledge of the true events can be questioned, why was it not the son writing? ...read more.


The Source tells us about Nolan?s personality ?headstrong? shows he has his own set of opinions on cavalry, similar to Source 1. However there is some uncertainty limiting the usefulness of this source as Paget mentions that there ?might have been friendly views exchanged on the delivery of the order? and as he was the second in command he may be covering up someone?s mistakes. To conclude having evaluated all the sources it is clear that Source 1 and 2 strongly disagree with the statement and support the relieving of the blame from Nolan?s name however Source 3 agrees and suggests that he was ?ill-suited? which is slightly supported by Source 2. However it can be seen that from the sources, that Captain Nolan was to blame to a limited extent as source 1 states that it could not have been him due to his published theories on tactics and source 2 defends him in saying that it was not his role to make such decisions, that was up to the higher ranking. And although Source 3 does agree to the statement when it mentions that he was ill-suited, this corroborates with Source 2 in a sense implying that he wasn?t the person to be leading this charge. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

There is strong understanding of the sources throughout and the author stays focused, resisting the urge to include additional knowledge. A 'for' and 'against' structure would have allowed for more comparison and some points about provenance are evaluated better than others. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 16/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'Wolsey's foreign policy reveals that he had no other aims than to exalt his ...

    4 star(s)

    archbishop of York but he also took care of all the administration for the crown, which Henry unlike his father took little part in. The disagreement concerning which policies if any were actually manoeuvred in self-interest by Wolsey continues however his pluralism is considered to be an indication of his love and greed for power.

  2. "William Wilberforce was primarily responsible for the abolition of the Slave Trade in the ...

    Clarkson was certainly the most important of the individual campaigners and with his sheer determination, intelligence and morality; he propelled the committee towards victory. Clarkson was responsible for the formation of the committee itself, after arranging a meeting in London, 1787 with Wilberforce, a group of existing campaigners (largely Quakers)

  1. How and why did Lord Liverpool survive the Radical Challenges of 1812 ...

    However a government spy called George Edwards had easily infiltrated them and acted as an agent provocateur, stirring up trouble making the threats more serious than they appeared, his information led to the arrest of the leader Arthur Thistlewood and four others as they gathered in Cato Street.

  2. Was Charles I responsible for his execution?

    Also the Spanish Armada had not been forgotten. This damaged the relationship further and it was never mended, even when his son Charles succeeded him to the throne. It seems that one of the most important short term causes of the civil war was Charles' inability to compromise.

  1. Why did the Absolute Monarchy Collapse between May and October 1789?

    Although not yet created, a constitution would mean the end of absolutism, absolutely. Therefore, this big step and cause of the collapse was provoked by the head of absolutism within France himself. However the session did take place. The king appeared, for the last time with all his Royal Trappings.

  2. What kind of king does Shakespeare create in Act 3 Scenes 1 and 2? ...

    delivering the speech reflects on Henry as being charismatic, dynamic and powerful towards his troops. Also, the troops standing around Henry being attentive reflects on the respect they have for Henry. The overall impression created of Henry is one of strength, nobility and egalitarian.

  1. Free essay

    Most of our people have never had it so good (Macmillan) To what extent ...

    MacMillan consistently hid the balance of payments problems in stop-go economic short termism and sterling devaluations. The economic boom had basically led to the economy becoming 'overheated and needed cooling', a result of the rise of affluence that required Conservatives to reduce government spending, increase bank rates to help lower demand with the aid of strict taxation.

  2. To what extent was Disraeli personally committed to social reform

    Indeed Disraeli later claimed that he was trying "to educate" his party, and that the Second Reform Act had "taken a happy opportunity to enlarge the privileges of the people...strengthen the institutions of the country ... and guard the rights of the people".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work