• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources suggest that Captain Nolan was to blame for the disastrous charge by the Light Brigade at Balaclava?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

[history homework] How far do the sources suggest that Captain Nolan was to blame for the disastrous charge by the Light Brigade at Balaclava? Having analysed all three sources it can be said that sources disagree to a considerable extent with the statement that Captain Nolan was to blame for the disastrous charge of the Light Brigade. Source 1 strongly disagrees and challenges the statement, as it states that the ?blame was hastily attached? to Nolan initially suggesting that he had been used as a scapegoat for the blame as he had died during the charge, allowing the commanding officers to plant the blame on him. However it states that these claims of Nolan being responsible were ?alleged? and he had ?been subsequently rescued from so grave an accusation?. The source goes on to make its own claims that his ?published theories on tactics? were of a totally different nature to the ones that were used in the charge and therefore it could not have been his fault as ?he could never have suggested it, even under an access of enthusiasm?. ...read more.

Middle

the eager spirit of Captain Nolan, then Lucan was to blame?, while suggesting this it does show some doubt with the use of the word ?if?. This source supports source 1?s comment that he was ?enthusiastic? corroborating with Source 2?s comment that he had and ?eager spirit?. Source 2 further comments that Lord Lucan should possess ?sufficient self-command? as a commanding officer, further agreeing with Source 1. The source is an extract of a letter written by the father of one of the survivors of the charge of the light brigade, which was published in the Examiner Newspaper from the time, which can be said to be some of its values as it has a credible Source of information as the Fathers son was actually there to witness the events, and it was from the time published in a reliable newspaper. The purpose of the letter seems to be to relieve Captain Nolan?s blame and put the blame on Lord Lucan. However the Source has some limitations, since the father was not there his actual knowledge of the true events can be questioned, why was it not the son writing? ...read more.

Conclusion

The Source tells us about Nolan?s personality ?headstrong? shows he has his own set of opinions on cavalry, similar to Source 1. However there is some uncertainty limiting the usefulness of this source as Paget mentions that there ?might have been friendly views exchanged on the delivery of the order? and as he was the second in command he may be covering up someone?s mistakes. To conclude having evaluated all the sources it is clear that Source 1 and 2 strongly disagree with the statement and support the relieving of the blame from Nolan?s name however Source 3 agrees and suggests that he was ?ill-suited? which is slightly supported by Source 2. However it can be seen that from the sources, that Captain Nolan was to blame to a limited extent as source 1 states that it could not have been him due to his published theories on tactics and source 2 defends him in saying that it was not his role to make such decisions, that was up to the higher ranking. And although Source 3 does agree to the statement when it mentions that he was ill-suited, this corroborates with Source 2 in a sense implying that he wasn?t the person to be leading this charge. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

There is strong understanding of the sources throughout and the author stays focused, resisting the urge to include additional knowledge. A 'for' and 'against' structure would have allowed for more comparison and some points about provenance are evaluated better than others. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 16/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    In what ways and to what extent does the concept of Spain's Golden Age ...

    5 star(s)

    By the end of his reign the fleet had nothing like the power and prestige of its 1560s victories. It is difficult to compare Spanish military power in terms of the army and the navy, in that their power declines and rises in proportion to the nature of the threat Spain was facing at the time.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent was James I responsible for his financial problems?

    the better because of the bone idleness of James and the disinterest of Parliament. Parliament was disinterested in the James' financial problems because they said the monarch should "live of his own". They were ignorant of James' problems and would not listen to the problems James had with inflation and

  1. Why was The Great Reform Act passed in 1832 ?

    Reform groups in Parliament, including the moderate Tories, drew together and supported Earl Grey, the Whig leader. Wellington's government fell and the Whigs came into power. However, William IV had a vital role in the passing of the Reform Bill.

  2. To What Extent Was Henry Vll Secure?

    claiming that he was Edward, Earl of Warwick, which would have given him a strong claim to the throne. A number of Yorkists supported him; many knowing this were only a fake just so that they could get back into Yorkists rule, in May 1487 Simnel and his supporters, led

  1. "Why, despite having been his closet supporter in 1461, was Richard Neville, Earl of ...

    Edward was still a relatively young king, and Warwick was there for advice, and with help in making decisions. Warwick's support was also necessary for Edward, as his kingship was still under-threat in the north and west by Margaret of Anjou's continued attempts to re-instate her husband to the throne.

  2. Free essay

    Most of our people have never had it so good (Macmillan) To what extent ...

    were all up for example wage rose by 72% ( which has positive effects on economy eg spending on consumer goods) This suggests how people really hadn't had it "so good" as people had more money to spend on things they didn't have before especially considering the rise in consumer goods.

  1. Religion was the most serious problem facing Elizabeth in 1558? How far do you ...

    So to solve this Elizabeth signed the treaty of Cateau-Cambrasis, this gave France Calais for 10 years. This can be thought of as a success; it postponed war and saved money. Therefore this problem isn't as important. Spain and the Netherlands was also a threat.

  2. Assess the reasons for the downfall of Lloyd George (DLG) In 1922

    This was the most important factor that led to his downfall as he had lost the faith of the Liberals who followed Asquith and often failed to impress the Conservatives with his decision and lack of consultation in many areas that were seen as failures by voters.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work