• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was aggressive and warlike in its foreign policy in the years 1899 - 1914?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was aggressive and warlike in its foreign policy in the years 1899 - 1914? The purpose of this essay is to analyse to what extent do the sources agree that Germany was aggressive and warlike between the years 1899 - 1914. World War One broke out in 1914, and Germany was heavily involved in the war, therefore, the aggressiveness of Germany's foreign policy at this time could be considered as one of the many contributing factors to the cause of war. Source one shows that it is not really sure if Germany is war like or not, it shows that Germany is very wary of "political envy". It shows that Germany is aware of an ultimatum; "In the coming century the German nation will either be the hammer or the anvil" meaning that if there is a war Germany will either be in control if they act now, or they will be defeated. ...read more.

Middle

This source can't seem to agree on whether Germany is warlike or not. It shows that they have "sometimes worked comfortably with Germany" showing that they can be agreeable and supportive at times. However, it also shows that "she has been extremely aggravating, sometimes unconsciously so, sometimes with intention", showing that Germany can be difficult to work with, at times being deliberately difficult. Source four is also a secret memo, however, this time it is by Kaiser Wilhelm II, and therefore may be more truthful toward the German point of view. This source shows that Germany is not warlike, but that Germany is actually the victim, "I no longer have any doubt that England, Russia and France have agreed among themselves - to use the Ausrto Serb conflict as a pretext for waging a war of annihilation against us" showing that Germany is going to be dragged in war though no fault of her own. Source five is a poem written by Heinrich Vierordt (German), to the German soldiers after the outbreak of war in 1914. ...read more.

Conclusion

Especially since it has a small coastline compared to France and Italy, showing that it doesn't need such a large navy. Also the large growing army shows that perhaps Germany is aggressive and warlike. Before the war she was building up and up an even larger army and navy. This is may imply that Germany were preparing for war, and therefore to be preparing for a war must have been warlike to expect it in the first place. In conclusion, it is in my opinion that Germany was aggressive and warlike in its foreign policy between the years 1899 - 1914. This is because it is clear from reading the sources that Germany was difficult to work with, that she was aware of a war brewing and that that she appeared to be building up her armed forces. However, although Germany appears warlike, Germany's aggressiveness may not have her own fault. From reading the sources one can see that Germany was "surrounded by governments who distrust her" and that when Germany was difficult to work with it was "sometimes unconsciously so". Considering these points one can understand perhaps why Germany was warlike and aggressive. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    The website further gives definitions of what public diplomacy is, citing various sources using its own agencies and department's definitions. It cites the State Department's own definition of the term: "Public Diplomacy refers to government-sponsored programs intended to inform or influence public opinion in other countries; its chief instruments are publication, motion pictures, cultural exchanges, radio and television."

  2. How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive ...

    Which means the facts is not distorted, because people tend to tend the truth when they no one else will read a secret piece of information. Francis clearly states that the other European powers (Francis seems to be implying France)

  1. How far was Germany responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914?

    British became, the closer they grew to the French and the Russians - and the more the Germans complained of 'encirclement' " Encirclement may have just been the Germans being paranoid about the potential enemies that were to the West and East of them, or perhaps the fear was well founded.

  2. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    * August 20 1968 Warsaw Pact forces invaded Czechoslovakia and Dubcek disappeared. He reappeared in Prague on 27 August and announced that the reforms had been stopped. * October 1968 All reforms were reversed and a temporary Soviet military occupation was announced.

  1. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    Russia like Austria-Hungary was being torn apart by internal instability. There was much social unrest and threats of another revolution; people had lost regard for the Tsar and his Ministers. As well as this Russia had been humiliated in 1905 when it was defeated by Japan, supposedly a 'second rate' nation.

  2. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    The dwindling Austrian Empire would be in greater danger if the Ottoman Empire collapsed which would threaten the balance of power that Disraeli advocated. It would be fair to say that being a Conservative he was not one for great, rapid change, which removing support of Turkey would bring and

  1. How Stable Was the Tsarist Autocracy in 1914?

    Pitiful wages, 60- hour working week, the rate of industrial accidents horrific, overcrowded housing etc. and a general crude attitude towards the workers means that the Liberal point of view seems like capitalism was simply not being implemented properly and that serious reforms would need to be considered if that

  2. To what extent can Britain's policy towards Germanybefore Munichbe defended?

    It had the effect of intensifying inter-service rivalry over the allocation of funds and gave the treasury a trump card whenever defence expenditures were discussed."7 It is not surprising then that they extended the Ten Year Rule further onto a daily basis where unless specified there would be no military action of any kind.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work