• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was aggressive and warlike in its foreign policy in the years 1899 - 1914?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was aggressive and warlike in its foreign policy in the years 1899 - 1914? The purpose of this essay is to analyse to what extent do the sources agree that Germany was aggressive and warlike between the years 1899 - 1914. World War One broke out in 1914, and Germany was heavily involved in the war, therefore, the aggressiveness of Germany's foreign policy at this time could be considered as one of the many contributing factors to the cause of war. Source one shows that it is not really sure if Germany is war like or not, it shows that Germany is very wary of "political envy". It shows that Germany is aware of an ultimatum; "In the coming century the German nation will either be the hammer or the anvil" meaning that if there is a war Germany will either be in control if they act now, or they will be defeated. ...read more.

Middle

This source can't seem to agree on whether Germany is warlike or not. It shows that they have "sometimes worked comfortably with Germany" showing that they can be agreeable and supportive at times. However, it also shows that "she has been extremely aggravating, sometimes unconsciously so, sometimes with intention", showing that Germany can be difficult to work with, at times being deliberately difficult. Source four is also a secret memo, however, this time it is by Kaiser Wilhelm II, and therefore may be more truthful toward the German point of view. This source shows that Germany is not warlike, but that Germany is actually the victim, "I no longer have any doubt that England, Russia and France have agreed among themselves - to use the Ausrto Serb conflict as a pretext for waging a war of annihilation against us" showing that Germany is going to be dragged in war though no fault of her own. Source five is a poem written by Heinrich Vierordt (German), to the German soldiers after the outbreak of war in 1914. ...read more.

Conclusion

Especially since it has a small coastline compared to France and Italy, showing that it doesn't need such a large navy. Also the large growing army shows that perhaps Germany is aggressive and warlike. Before the war she was building up and up an even larger army and navy. This is may imply that Germany were preparing for war, and therefore to be preparing for a war must have been warlike to expect it in the first place. In conclusion, it is in my opinion that Germany was aggressive and warlike in its foreign policy between the years 1899 - 1914. This is because it is clear from reading the sources that Germany was difficult to work with, that she was aware of a war brewing and that that she appeared to be building up her armed forces. However, although Germany appears warlike, Germany's aggressiveness may not have her own fault. From reading the sources one can see that Germany was "surrounded by governments who distrust her" and that when Germany was difficult to work with it was "sometimes unconsciously so". Considering these points one can understand perhaps why Germany was warlike and aggressive. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Slovakia was also to be given some self-rule. * July 1968 Dubcek was summoned to attend conferences in Warsaw and Moscow, but refused to go. The whole Soviet Politburo then visited Prague to try to persuade Dubcek to reverse the reforms.

  2. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    Russia, despite her importance in the escalation of war, was not the major factor in the outbreak for war. Russia had been put in a very difficult position by the actions and aggressions of the German backed Austrians, whereby they either went to war or last their 'world power' status

  1. How far was Germany responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914?

    The repercussions of this event began the rapid descent to war. The Austrian government could obviously not ignore the assassination of their heir. AJP Taylor is of the view that "The obvious thing to do was to blame the nationalists and particularly to blame Serbia who really had nothing to do with it".

  2. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    The dwindling Austrian Empire would be in greater danger if the Ottoman Empire collapsed which would threaten the balance of power that Disraeli advocated. It would be fair to say that being a Conservative he was not one for great, rapid change, which removing support of Turkey would bring and

  1. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    and the new union treaty, put Gorbachev, who was vacationing in the Crimea, under house arrest in an attempt to seize power from him. Through the coup attempt was unsuccessful, it was clear Gorbachev's central administration was quite impotent, leaving room for the assertion of power by the republics, in particular the Russian republic and its leader Boris Yeltsin.

  2. How Stable Was the Tsarist Autocracy in 1914?

    ideal liberal market place, in which workers would be able to "become integrated with the rest of society" (Acton), were to appear. Both Revisionists and Soviets agree that there was in reality emerging a brutal form of industrial capitalism, rather than the "fostering of moderation, reformism and concern with purely economic goals" that the Liberals promise.

  1. How far do you support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in ...

    Von Bulow also described forces Germany needed to sustain increasing influence over the European political and economic agenda, those forces being, "power," and, "a strong army, and navy." We therefore learn that German forces of 1899 are not strong enough to sustain, "the battle for existence."

  2. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    come up with a wide range of instruments that could enforce its foreign policy which was classified by Edwards, Wattenberg and Lineberry into three major groups: military, economic, and diplomatic7. For our purposes, we shall only be taking up diplomacy, which Edwards defines as "the process by which nations carry on relationships with each other8".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work