• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was war like and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1899-1914?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1899-1914? The six sources give very contradictory views on the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive. The German chancellor, Von Bulow (source 1) and the Kaiser (source 4) strongly feel that it was not Germany who was being aggressive, but the other European powers. Germany was merely protecting itself from the increasing threat cast upon them through the "envy" and jealousy other countries felt against them; they needed a strong army and navy to survive. They were either to become the "hammer or the anvil", and so increasing their military was done only so they could direct the power, not become dominated by it. ...read more.

Middle

As they are given from a German governmental perspective, they are not going to show themselves to be aggressive and therefore in the wrong. For example, although source 1 claimed only that Germany was protecting herself, Von Bulow was actually largely involved in the aggressive Weltpolitik policy. So the sources are biased, and can only be used to give the German opinion of the situation. These sources give a reliable account of the Germans opinions, but not of the situation as a whole. Source 6 is neither unreliable nor biased, as it is factual, not giving a point of view or opinion, making it a good source to use. Source 6 can also be used for the other side of the argument, as it shows that Germanys army more than doubled between 1910 to 1914, a huge feat! ...read more.

Conclusion

Although this source is extremely aggressive, it is not very significant or reliable because it has been purposely written to rally the German soldiers when they are already at war and therefore cannot be blamed for having an aggressive attitude. Along with source 6, source 3 gives an overall view, showing that there is truth to both sides of the debate; Germany was both looking for peace, and was a warlike country. Germany could be very diplomatic and helpful, but as very tight bargainers, if things did not go their way, this would become "intensely disagreeable", selfish, arrogant, and manipulated all countries against each other. It was this attitude that was seen to be aggressive. As it was written in 1907, this opinion did change in the build-up to war, as the relationships between countries grew stronger and weaker. So in conclusion, the sources give a mixed opinion about whether Germany was warlike and aggressive, or defensive and peaceful in its foreign policy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    In the 1920s and 1930s, US armed forces were very weak. * Germany was not allowed to join, but did become a member in 1926. * Italy broke the Covenant in 1923 when Mussolini occupied Corfu, which was owned by Greece.

  2. To What extent was German Foreign Policy responsible for the outbreak of general European ...

    served to strengthen the Russian resolve to stand to aggression from the Central Powers. The Tsar himself wanted peace and this was shown by his hesitation in ordering mobilisation, yet the influential military leaders such as Sukhomlinov who advocated war manipulated him.

  1. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    The loss of personality and property systematically erased the conception of freedom as natural and alienable. It is imperative to acknowledge that it was not only the capacity for acting autonomously that was affected but also the ability to think freely and with innovation.

  2. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    In traditional diplomacy, U.S. Embassy officials represent the U.S. Government in a host country primarily by maintaining relations and conducting official USG business with the officials of the host government whereas public diplomacy primarily engages many diverse non-government elements of a society14." This makes sense who would be in a better position to target

  1. How far do you support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in ...

    Which when compared to source six is certainly valid. It is no coincidence Germany raised the most army expenditure during 1890 - 1900. Although not in the stated period it is worth noting her army expenditure was second only to France in 1890, but by 1900 it had raised considerably whereas France's had dropped.

  2. The question states to what extent was Germany's foreign policy aggressive and warlike; we ...

    connection, politically, militarily and economically is, as Francis Bertie said: "not much to inspire." This lack of support from other powers shows they have no reason to be warlike as they would be in a perpetually weak position. Source 3 also complements this, as it doesn't show any need for

  1. Reasons for the increasing support given to NSDAP by the German people in the ...

    As Gregor Strasser observed, Hitler had an ability to read the collective mind of the congregation; "Hitler responds to the vibration of the human heart with the delicacy of a seismograph... enabling him, with a certainty with which no conscious gift could endow him, to act as a loudspeaker proclaiming

  2. How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive ...

    This source is a secret memorandum of Francis Bertie (who is a senior politician whom had great influence in foreign issues); it clearly shows how 'encircled' Germany felt, and how worried Germany was about Frances intentions. This is a secret memorandum so it is not for public consumption, but for private viewing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work