• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1889-14?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1889-14? By looking at the six pieces of evidence I can make a very good analysis on whether Germany warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy. Source one is direct evidence within the German camp due to the fact that the chancellor was a very influential and authoritative figure in German politics; his words were to be taken very seriously. This speech was given out to the German Parliament in December 1899 which instantly implies that he was out to achieve an aim. The chancellor made it clear in his speech that he did not want to go back to the "old German." He felt that ' the times of political impotence and economic and political insignificance must not return.' This was a very exaggerated comment as although Germany was a new country made up different and individual states there was no evidence in its history to show that there were great economic problems. ...read more.

Middle

He knew that Germany wanted and needed to be on allies with Britain due to its own weak allies. He felt that she was a strong nation who had the power to cause problem in Europe with the information it had. To him, Germany could be trusted, 'she is always ready with information for our consumption of Russian and French plots.' or trying to cause trouble depending on how the information was received. In this memo, he was defending Germany as everyone was spying on each other due to the great distrust in erupt at the time, even Britain had 'sinister designs.' Source three was another secret memo, however this time it was in a response to an earlier memo. He felt that Germany was not a diplomatic country and were 'very tight bargainers' He felt that Germany was easily offended and yet offended others unintentionally. He was saying that Germany wasn't intentionally trying to cause trouble and direst within Europe. He as defending and excusing Germany in response to Mr crowe whom felt that Germany had an 'un chequered record of black deeds.' ...read more.

Conclusion

This cannot be seen as evidence of how warlike and aggressive Germany was. Every nation involved in the war had certain techniques in which it used to inspire its people for war and to raise moral. It was just pure propaganda. The same could be said for source six, you can only take the information on face value. By analysing the difference in the money spent on armies and navies from 1880 to 1914 you will see that all nations were increasing their investments in these areas. However, the country that stands out on this increase is Germany, due to their weltpolitik aim, overall, every one was getting aggressive for the probable onset of war. By analysing all theses six different sources, there is no conclusive evidence on whether Germany was warlike and aggressive. All the evidence balances each other out and if I had to make a judgement, I would say that every nation was aggressive and warlike, the evidence for his is source six. It was well known that there was great pressure on Germany as the eyes of the world were on them. Every mistake they made was noted and used against them and it could be said that they were picked on. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    end of the Second World War, they agreed to divide the country into four zones, one each for the USA, the USSR, Britain and France. * Each of the four allies was to be responsible for its own sector. Decisions affecting Germany as a whole would be taken jointly and

  2. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    As a man of principles he did not like to see such wrong doings carried out, especially against his fellow Christians. The Berlin Memorandum in May 1876 offered a diplomatic solution to the problem as it involved Austria Germany and Russia.

  1. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    members of the international community and play by the rules of the game. Armenia and Azerbaijan from the beginning declared that they would democratize. They would adopt rules and regulations that would promote institutions of democracy. They would have free elections, and institute liberal market economies.

  2. How far do you support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in ...

    The Navy was one area where Germany was not ahead in Europe. Her expenditure was considerably less at the time of this report than two other major countries involved in this process of aggressive and warlike behaviour, Britain and France.

  1. How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive ...

    who do not like Germany, or in other words hate them as a nation. One may argue that Germany did have an excuse to 'warlike and aggressive' in their relations with other countries. France was a direct threat to Germany, and Germany knew that France would be seeking their revenge

  2. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    come up with a wide range of instruments that could enforce its foreign policy which was classified by Edwards, Wattenberg and Lineberry into three major groups: military, economic, and diplomatic7. For our purposes, we shall only be taking up diplomacy, which Edwards defines as "the process by which nations carry on relationships with each other8".

  1. How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was aggressive and warlike ...

    with France and that she intends to take parts of Holland and Belgium. Although it says this about her it also shows sympathy towards her, "she is surrounded by governments who distrust her," suggesting that she has choice but to act warlike due to her situation.

  2. Chinese (Prc) Foreign Policy - the Character of PRC’S Foreign Policy

    -Mao was at first hesitant to commit China to Korea, but felt obliged to enter. It was impossible to remain detached from the affairs of its neighbour. -Also a sense of following the Soviet lead in foreign affairs. -Some discussion within China, with leading military commanders Gao Gang and Lin

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work