• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1889-14?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy in the years 1889-14? By looking at the six pieces of evidence I can make a very good analysis on whether Germany warlike and aggressive in its foreign policy. Source one is direct evidence within the German camp due to the fact that the chancellor was a very influential and authoritative figure in German politics; his words were to be taken very seriously. This speech was given out to the German Parliament in December 1899 which instantly implies that he was out to achieve an aim. The chancellor made it clear in his speech that he did not want to go back to the "old German." He felt that ' the times of political impotence and economic and political insignificance must not return.' This was a very exaggerated comment as although Germany was a new country made up different and individual states there was no evidence in its history to show that there were great economic problems. ...read more.

Middle

He knew that Germany wanted and needed to be on allies with Britain due to its own weak allies. He felt that she was a strong nation who had the power to cause problem in Europe with the information it had. To him, Germany could be trusted, 'she is always ready with information for our consumption of Russian and French plots.' or trying to cause trouble depending on how the information was received. In this memo, he was defending Germany as everyone was spying on each other due to the great distrust in erupt at the time, even Britain had 'sinister designs.' Source three was another secret memo, however this time it was in a response to an earlier memo. He felt that Germany was not a diplomatic country and were 'very tight bargainers' He felt that Germany was easily offended and yet offended others unintentionally. He was saying that Germany wasn't intentionally trying to cause trouble and direst within Europe. He as defending and excusing Germany in response to Mr crowe whom felt that Germany had an 'un chequered record of black deeds.' ...read more.

Conclusion

This cannot be seen as evidence of how warlike and aggressive Germany was. Every nation involved in the war had certain techniques in which it used to inspire its people for war and to raise moral. It was just pure propaganda. The same could be said for source six, you can only take the information on face value. By analysing the difference in the money spent on armies and navies from 1880 to 1914 you will see that all nations were increasing their investments in these areas. However, the country that stands out on this increase is Germany, due to their weltpolitik aim, overall, every one was getting aggressive for the probable onset of war. By analysing all theses six different sources, there is no conclusive evidence on whether Germany was warlike and aggressive. All the evidence balances each other out and if I had to make a judgement, I would say that every nation was aggressive and warlike, the evidence for his is source six. It was well known that there was great pressure on Germany as the eyes of the world were on them. Every mistake they made was noted and used against them and it could be said that they were picked on. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Why did tension increase in Europe between 1900 and 1914?

    Berlin would also be divided into four sectors. * Poland would be given land in the west, which would be taken from Germany and would lose land to the USSR. Stalin agreed that some members of the Polish government in exile (the London Poles) would be allowed to join the Polish government that he had set up (the Lublin Poles).

  2. Consider How Far Gladstone And Disraeli Differed In Their Policies Regarding The British Empire ...

    Gladstone on the other side had sympathy for the Balkan Christians and for the rights of smaller nations especially those who wanted to rule themselves, he saw this as more important than the possible threat of Russia who in reality had never launched a large European invasion and could have easily destroyed the Ottoman Empire if she had so wished.

  1. American History.

    - Then came the Deposit Act of 1836, which allowed the Secretary of the Treasury to choose one bank per state to do what the SBUS used to. The act also provided that any federal surplus over $5 million be given to the states starting in 1837.

  2. Reasons for the increasing support given to NSDAP by the German people in the ...

    the foreign powers, the remilitarisation of Germany and everything else the public wished for. The trial lasted 24 days and reached the front pages on a daily basis. With the eyes of Germany on him "he pleaded guilty. Not for treason - but for patriotism."

  1. The role of foreign policy on democratic transitions in Armenia and Azerbaijan

    In fact, the fabric of Soviet society had been gradually unraveling for years. By the time Mikhail Gorbachev assumed leadership of the Soviet Union he was aware of that things coulds not continue in the same manner. In 1985, Gorbachev tried to introduce the reforms of 'acceleration' and 'intensification' in relation to upgrading productivity.

  2. Chinese (Prc) Foreign Policy - the Character of PRC’S Foreign Policy

    Development of Chinese atomic weapons in the 60s vii. Deep-set ideological differences 1950> PRC is anti-US imperialism, to such a degree that Chinese school children chanted 'Death to the American imperialists and all their running dogs'. Campaign peaked in the late 60s with the Cultural revolution and the Vietnam War.

  1. The Foreign Policy of the Lone Superpower

    terms as "public diplomacy"9 In this online document, Roberts provides a detailed explanation of how the United States government successfully handled their diplomatic duties, outside of the embassies and how this fully evolved in what is now called public diplomacy.

  2. How far do the sources support the idea that Germany was warlike and aggressive ...

    Which means the facts is not distorted, because people tend to tend the truth when they no one else will read a secret piece of information. Francis clearly states that the other European powers (Francis seems to be implying France)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work