• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do these sources agree that Wolsey's foreign policy was defensive?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do these sources suggest that Wolsey's foreign policy was defensive? Wolsey was a very cautious man, he satisfied Henry's requests as well as using his requirements to earn and achieve his own positions. Wolsey was only fifteen when he entered Oxford University, one of the best universities in the whole of England. This demonstrates his firm personality, he wasn't born into a noble family and is believed that his father was a cattle dealer; this meant he had to sacrifice himself to achieve his positions. He ended up as one of the most powerful men in the whole of England; some say he was more powerful than Henry himself. Being a religious believer may have influenced Wolsey on to make peace instead of provoking war, these sources are mostly written in a colloquial language and all commonly agree that it was a waste of money to invest in the French territory. ...read more.

Middle

His certainty was increased by events such as those at the Field of the Cloth of Gold in 1520.'' assuming that he was seen as a brave king thereafter this event. However, source G disagrees with Source F as it states that Wolsey wanted to make peace between countries suggesting that his policy was defensive as he didn't intend to provoke war. ''...Wolsey established England as the peacemaker ...'' this statement describes how Wolsey intended ally England to main powerful countries such as France, yet he is described as a cautious man that tries to satisfy Henry's ambition for representitiveness; ''...he was careful not to ignore Henry's desire for military glory...'' therefore suggesting that Wolsey was cautious not to agreviate Henry's need for military power and established peace throughout Europe. This source was also written in the twentieth century by Angela Anderson and Tony Imperato, the fact that it was written by two historians implies that it is reliable yet debatable as it is also a secondary source. ...read more.

Conclusion

Source H is weighted towards the idea that Wolsey's foreign policy is defensive as it shows that he is discouraging the invasion of France. Source G and H support the idea that Wolsey's foreing policy was defensive and have described that Wolsey would often discourage invasions. Yet source F describes that Wolsey's policy was not defensive as the Field of the Cloth of Gold was a main that showed otherwise furthermore, Wolsey did plan the invasion where Tournai and Theruanne were seized. However, all the sources state that the invasion of France was considered a loss of money. Moreover, it is agreed that Wolsey's Foreign policy was defensive as it was in his high interest to establish stable relationships with the rest of Europe. I strongly believe that Wolsey's foreign policy was defensive as in numerous occasions and events such as the treaty of London in 1518 which Wolsey proposed and organised; it was signed and agreed by major nations that they would not invade one another and would aid if any were under threat. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This is a really good attempt to stick closely to the sources and does not drift off into narrative. In some places the sources are used together and this essay would be even better if there was more cross referencing and comparison of the views presented in the sources. It would also get a higher level if the evaluation of the sources was more detailed and considered how the provenance of the sources effects its value.

Marked by teacher Kate Forbes 29/08/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Did Oliver Cromwell achieve his objectives from 1642 to 1658?

    5 star(s)

    He knew he needed the support of the conservative gentry and propertied and did a number of things to gain their support. He knew they feared radical reforms, so agreed to the shutting down of Barebones Parliament. The crushing of levellers and the sacking of Fifth Monarchist advisers helped portray a conservative Cromwell.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    He explains that Wentworth was 'foolhardy, impetuous and politically inept' and 'did little to enhance the efficiency of the Commons and was little more than a parliamentary nuisance'.

  1. How effective was Henry VII’s government?

    Overall, this could have resulted in a more difficult situation for Henry, and really, a government should not allow this to happen as it could endanger the king's position. The final aspect of Henry's government was his relations with other countries, as depicted in his foreign policy.

  2. What were the aims of English Foreign Policy 1529-1558?

    His foreign policy was much less active than previously, which did cause some concern at home.

  1. Henry VIII foreign policy

    Henry could therefore not marry Anne Boleyn while he was a member of the Catholic Church. So he left it and England became protestant. He was also then excommunicated which is being kicked out of the church but he already left.

  2. Religion was the most serious problem facing Elizabeth in 1558? How far do you ...

    The rates didn't match the rate of inflation. England's economy was also hit hard by the collapse of the cloth market; this was one of England's biggest trades and with the collapse of market trade lines with Antwerp how was England going to make any money!

  1. How well did Pitt deal with the radical threat?

    new-looking government was the foundation of what became the Conservative Party of the 19th and 20th centuries, which highlights the significance of moderate Whig?s breaking free from Fox and joining Pitt. These rather unexpected turn of events stabilised Pitt?s position in the country, and allowed him to continue fighting against

  2. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    The third reason Pitt was able to dominate politics was the weaknesses of his opposition. The main opposition to William Pitt came in the form of the Whigs, with Fox leading the way. Although the Whig?s had royal links, they were of the wrong sort and affected them for the worse.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work