• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that a study of Russian government in the period 1855 to 1956 suggests that Russia did little more than exchange Romanov Tsars for Red Tsars(TM) from 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that a study of Russian government in the period 1855 to 1956 suggests that Russia did little more than exchange Romanov Tsars for 'Red Tsars' from 1917? This is a debate that many historians participate in on Russia's government. There are two sides to the argument either that Lenin and Stalin had in fact created a new, radical communist party or whether they had both just continued the previous Romanov Tsars' ideologies. One of the major differences between both Lenin and his predecessor Stalin, and the Romanov Tsars is that the first had to 'take' power. The Tsars claimed that they had been chosen by God to rule Russia so they, in effect, inherited there power. It was much harder for Lenin as he had to lead several uprisings such as the November Massacre. It was not until 25th October that Lenin and the Bolsheviks seized Petrograd and in turn took power for themselves. This is a key difference between the two powers as it shows how much Lenin was willing to go through in order to gain control. ...read more.

Middle

in order to get rid of any opposition standing in his way. Although the Cheka was supposedly only meant to be a short term group it still stands today as the KGB. This use of repression by the 'communists' was known as the 'Red Terror' and was carried out by the Cheka and the Red army. The use of repression by both the communists and the Tsars shows another strong link between the two, because neither didn't mind using force and terror in order to maintain power over Russia. However, when Lenin came into power he made new reforms which weren't conservative like the previous reforms made by the Tsars. One of the reforms made by Lenin was to try and make the government democratic as this was seen as a large section of Marxism. He created the reform that Russians could elect their own local constituents. Although on paper this sounds democratic, this is in fact not so as the people could only vote for other Bolshevik party members as Russia was at this time a one-party state. ...read more.

Conclusion

On one day alone he sentenced 6,000 of his own people to death. This number of murders in one day was more than the whole 100 year Romanov dynasty had accumulated. This gives us a very dark image of Stalin and shows that he was probably the most ruthless leader for Russia to have. This allows us to compare Stalin to the Tsars and shows that there were definite similarities between the two and it also allows us to see to what extend Stalin went in order to keep his power. True communism can never really occur in the world unless every single person agrees with it and work towards it, which is impossible as everyone has different opinions on different matters. It is due to this that Lenin and Stalin were in fact just continuing the work of the Romanovs by becoming Red Tsars themselves. The reason being that many of their reforms and 'creations', e.g. the Cheka, were in fact anti-communist. Many historians believe that both Leninism and Stalinism were at times on the brink of fascism which is the complete opposite to their 'supposed' Marxist views. Overall it was only until recently that Russia finally managed to boost democracy and improve the way the government is run. Tom Gunhouse ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    Both Lenin and Stalin believed in a strong internal state, in which the party had complete control in the running of government. However Lenin did not believe in a creation of a cult of personality as Stalin did, as Stalin established himself as 'the fount of all wisdom'5, this glorification

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    about the Terror was that it could strike anyone, anywhere, at any time. * The victims never really knew why they were enmeshed in the system. Often they had been implicated by previous victims under torture, in an effort to save themselves. How much was Stalin involved in the Terror?

  1. The downfall of the Romanov Dynasty

    only reason the Tsar survived was by promising changes (October Manifesto), however he couldn't fool the people twice. However, it can be noted that he did have time to change it around but he obviously did not learn from the near disaster of 1905 as stated in source 6.

  2. 'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree ...

    There is also considerable continuity in the use of the secret police throughout the period, as the 3rd section under Alexander II right up to the KGB under Khrushchev shows. Similarly to Alexander II easing censorship, Khrushchev relaxed many aspects of Stalinist repression, briefly abolishing the death penalty and treating opponents more leniently.

  1. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    the ultimate blame of the failure of the war fell upon him. Tsar also missed out on opportunities to retain the support of politically progressive parties due to his dismissals of the duma's appeal to him to replace his incompetent cabinet.

  2. How secure was the Tsars power up to 1904

    Although, as we have seen, Alexander was known at the early part of his reign as the 'Tsar Liberator", the reforms did not go far enough. The first part of his rule was a time of unique intellectual activity in Russia with the emergence of great Russian writers such as Dosteoyevsky.

  1. Assess the impact that Lenin had on Russia and the Russian people.

    Lenin was the driving force behind the revolution, which meant that his leadership would change Russia forever. Several long term impacts such as the change to communism would remain for the next 70 tears and he had set a precedent for future communist leader all over the world.

  2. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    Stalin saw the peasants as a threat, and wished to break their spirit. During the famine of 1932-34[19] he prevented the movement of peasants from the countryside by blocking their access to trains ? OGPU officials checked the trains heading for the cities;[20] in affect entrapping the starving peasants.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work