• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that a study of Russian government in the period 1855 to 1956 suggests that Russia did little more than exchange Romanov Tsars for Red Tsars(TM) from 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that a study of Russian government in the period 1855 to 1956 suggests that Russia did little more than exchange Romanov Tsars for 'Red Tsars' from 1917? This is a debate that many historians participate in on Russia's government. There are two sides to the argument either that Lenin and Stalin had in fact created a new, radical communist party or whether they had both just continued the previous Romanov Tsars' ideologies. One of the major differences between both Lenin and his predecessor Stalin, and the Romanov Tsars is that the first had to 'take' power. The Tsars claimed that they had been chosen by God to rule Russia so they, in effect, inherited there power. It was much harder for Lenin as he had to lead several uprisings such as the November Massacre. It was not until 25th October that Lenin and the Bolsheviks seized Petrograd and in turn took power for themselves. This is a key difference between the two powers as it shows how much Lenin was willing to go through in order to gain control. ...read more.

Middle

in order to get rid of any opposition standing in his way. Although the Cheka was supposedly only meant to be a short term group it still stands today as the KGB. This use of repression by the 'communists' was known as the 'Red Terror' and was carried out by the Cheka and the Red army. The use of repression by both the communists and the Tsars shows another strong link between the two, because neither didn't mind using force and terror in order to maintain power over Russia. However, when Lenin came into power he made new reforms which weren't conservative like the previous reforms made by the Tsars. One of the reforms made by Lenin was to try and make the government democratic as this was seen as a large section of Marxism. He created the reform that Russians could elect their own local constituents. Although on paper this sounds democratic, this is in fact not so as the people could only vote for other Bolshevik party members as Russia was at this time a one-party state. ...read more.

Conclusion

On one day alone he sentenced 6,000 of his own people to death. This number of murders in one day was more than the whole 100 year Romanov dynasty had accumulated. This gives us a very dark image of Stalin and shows that he was probably the most ruthless leader for Russia to have. This allows us to compare Stalin to the Tsars and shows that there were definite similarities between the two and it also allows us to see to what extend Stalin went in order to keep his power. True communism can never really occur in the world unless every single person agrees with it and work towards it, which is impossible as everyone has different opinions on different matters. It is due to this that Lenin and Stalin were in fact just continuing the work of the Romanovs by becoming Red Tsars themselves. The reason being that many of their reforms and 'creations', e.g. the Cheka, were in fact anti-communist. Many historians believe that both Leninism and Stalinism were at times on the brink of fascism which is the complete opposite to their 'supposed' Marxist views. Overall it was only until recently that Russia finally managed to boost democracy and improve the way the government is run. Tom Gunhouse ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * Managers of industries who did not meet their targets for production. * Scientists, engineers, experts of any kind who Stalin did not trust or understand. Only loyal party officials, who accepted Stalin's decision without question, were safe. * Army and Navy officers; every Admiral of the Soviet fleet, three

  2. 'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree ...

    There is also considerable continuity in the use of the secret police throughout the period, as the 3rd section under Alexander II right up to the KGB under Khrushchev shows. Similarly to Alexander II easing censorship, Khrushchev relaxed many aspects of Stalinist repression, briefly abolishing the death penalty and treating opponents more leniently.

  1. How far was the First World War responsible for the downfall of the Romanovs ...

    In addition the formation of the progressive bloc (236 of the Duma deputies who were denied a voice in the national policy)) which persuaded the Tsar to make political concessions were horrified at his stubbornness, and as a result the Tsar had lost a support and gained an enemy at

  2. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    of the Tsar, it is obvious to understand why the people of Russia called for abdication in February 1917, because of the amount of discontent that was present over the country. Both describe the impatience that was growing against the Tsarist regime, the effects of the latter, the Tsar's personality,

  1. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or we will be crushed.?[26] In order to raise the capital needed to develop Soviet industry, Stalin saw that the necessary first step was to collectivise Russian agriculture ? defined by him as ?the setting up of

  2. Opposition to Russian governments was ineffective in the period from 1855 to 1964. How ...

    Similarly Stalin was not initially focused on matters abroad instead focusing on modernising Russia with his 5 Year Plans. However, once the Great Patriotic War was won he effectively got rid of any opposition to Russian rule in several states to create a Sphere of Influence in Eastern Europe.

  1. 'Alexander III was the most successful Tsar in the period 1855-1917'. How far do ...

    over into the reign of Nicholas, the fact that he was appointed by Alexander III, means that in this area he was most successful. In the same year as the emancipation act, 1861, a new Minister of War, Dmitri Milyutin, was appointed by Alexander II, for the purpose of overseeing a major overhaul in Russia's military.

  2. How far could the fall of the Tsars be considered the most significant turning ...

    form of the Tsarist secret police, was created with the purpose to ?counter ? revolution and sabotage?, and its powers of arrest, detention and torture were unlimited. This is supported by Sheila Fitzpatrick, ?The Cheka became an organ of terror, dispensing summary justice such as executions?[7].

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work