• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that a study of Russian government in the period 1855 to 1956 suggests that Russia did little more than exchange Romanov Tsars for Red Tsars(TM) from 1917?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that a study of Russian government in the period 1855 to 1956 suggests that Russia did little more than exchange Romanov Tsars for 'Red Tsars' from 1917? This is a debate that many historians participate in on Russia's government. There are two sides to the argument either that Lenin and Stalin had in fact created a new, radical communist party or whether they had both just continued the previous Romanov Tsars' ideologies. One of the major differences between both Lenin and his predecessor Stalin, and the Romanov Tsars is that the first had to 'take' power. The Tsars claimed that they had been chosen by God to rule Russia so they, in effect, inherited there power. It was much harder for Lenin as he had to lead several uprisings such as the November Massacre. It was not until 25th October that Lenin and the Bolsheviks seized Petrograd and in turn took power for themselves. This is a key difference between the two powers as it shows how much Lenin was willing to go through in order to gain control. ...read more.

Middle

in order to get rid of any opposition standing in his way. Although the Cheka was supposedly only meant to be a short term group it still stands today as the KGB. This use of repression by the 'communists' was known as the 'Red Terror' and was carried out by the Cheka and the Red army. The use of repression by both the communists and the Tsars shows another strong link between the two, because neither didn't mind using force and terror in order to maintain power over Russia. However, when Lenin came into power he made new reforms which weren't conservative like the previous reforms made by the Tsars. One of the reforms made by Lenin was to try and make the government democratic as this was seen as a large section of Marxism. He created the reform that Russians could elect their own local constituents. Although on paper this sounds democratic, this is in fact not so as the people could only vote for other Bolshevik party members as Russia was at this time a one-party state. ...read more.

Conclusion

On one day alone he sentenced 6,000 of his own people to death. This number of murders in one day was more than the whole 100 year Romanov dynasty had accumulated. This gives us a very dark image of Stalin and shows that he was probably the most ruthless leader for Russia to have. This allows us to compare Stalin to the Tsars and shows that there were definite similarities between the two and it also allows us to see to what extend Stalin went in order to keep his power. True communism can never really occur in the world unless every single person agrees with it and work towards it, which is impossible as everyone has different opinions on different matters. It is due to this that Lenin and Stalin were in fact just continuing the work of the Romanovs by becoming Red Tsars themselves. The reason being that many of their reforms and 'creations', e.g. the Cheka, were in fact anti-communist. Many historians believe that both Leninism and Stalinism were at times on the brink of fascism which is the complete opposite to their 'supposed' Marxist views. Overall it was only until recently that Russia finally managed to boost democracy and improve the way the government is run. Tom Gunhouse ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent does Stalin deserve the title of Red Tsar when assessing his ...

    5 star(s)

    as the 'Father of Russia'6 never appeared in such extreme force under Lenin nor Khrushchev. Therefore historian Moshe Lewin argues that Stalin's system of government was "a hybrid of Marxism and Tsarism"7, as a creation of a cult of personality contains few Marxist-Leninist roots, but harkens back to the Russian tradition of leader worship.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * What is open to debate is how much of the Terror was directed from the Centre, and how much a result of local forces getting out of control. * Were some of the worst acts of terror either settling of old scores or examples of enthusiasm for building socialism?

  1. How far was the First World War the main cause of the fall of ...

    This encouraged people to believe that the Political System needed to be changed, not reformed, contrary to the beliefs in the 1905 'Revolution'. Consequently, the Duma became increasingly critical of the government's conduct of the war, and conflicts between Duma and government were intensified by the repressive way in which the government treated the Duma.

  2. 'Communists and Tsars ruled Russia in the same way.' How far do you agree ...

    There is also considerable continuity in the use of the secret police throughout the period, as the 3rd section under Alexander II right up to the KGB under Khrushchev shows. Similarly to Alexander II easing censorship, Khrushchev relaxed many aspects of Stalinist repression, briefly abolishing the death penalty and treating opponents more leniently.

  1. The downfall of the Romanov Dynasty

    Other historians believe a revolution was inevitable due to the weak state of Russia. There are various reasons why the Russian state at the time could be deemed as weak. In 1904 Russia had been humiliated in a war with Japan, and a year later a 'revolution' broke out the

  2. Why Were There Two Revolutions in Russia in 1917?

    Lenin persuaded the rest of the Bolsheviks to take on his proposals, and published his April Thesis the day after he returned. His thesis insisted on a 'no-support' policy for the Provisional Government, the persuading of workers and key individuals in order to build support for the party.

  1. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    * However, she was then arrested by the French Army, spent 3 months in a mental health facility and was finally released in August 1947, until the French classified her as de-nazified. * She returned to her Tiejiand project but was put under house arrest.

  2. How far did government policies change towards agriculture in Russia in the period 1856-1964? ...

    an end for the prevailing Communist government: that ultimate end being the build up and advancement of industry. In a passionate appeal at the First Conference of Workers in 1931,[25] Stalin lays down the context for his economic policies for the next thirteen years: ?we are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work