• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Alexander's reforms were both radical and successful?

Extracts from this document...


How far do you agree that Alexander's reforms were both radical and successful? In 1855, Alexander II took over the Russian throne following the death of his Father. As a new Tsar he faced many problems. There was low morale in the Army as he took over the throne just after the humiliating Crimean War, where many serfs were conscripted to fight, which caused unrest. The low morale was also present as the serfs were from different ethnic groups and were poorly educated so success was a rare for the army. He also faced the difficulties of the unfair system of ruling, making Russia a hard country to govern. Inevitably, the vast size of Russia didn't help with the ruling by the Tsar as all the power was centralized and contained a huge amount of different religions which all had their own opinions. Inevitably, it made Russia a hard country to govern. The most difficult problem that Alexander II faced was the social state of Russian people. ...read more.


In 1865 they issued a new set of guidelines for writers and editors to follow. The main aim of this reform was to extend the public 'freedom of expression' which had been heavily restricted in past years by severe censorship of papers and books. The reform had some successes as the emancipation of the serfs was openly discussed and the editors no longer needed to get approval from the Tsar. But like the emancipation of the serfs, it also had its limitations. In 1873, certain topics were forbidden. Again Alexander went back on his word, as the freedom of expression was restricted as was the serf's freedom. Alexander was also able to reform the industry in Russia, which overall was mainly successful. He was able to expand the workforce from 860,000 to 1,320,000 by 1887, which resulted in new industries and methods being able to be set up, for e.g. the increase in coal production and textile industries. This helped Russia to catch up with its powerful Western Europe Industries and allies Education was reformed to prevent barriers between people as many serfs could not write or read. ...read more.


The judges were also paid higher wages, so the chances of them accepting bribes were reduced. This was successful as there was now a freedom of expression within the courts but they were still operated by the secret police and Tsar who had a lot of power over the court cases, and also political cases were not tried in courts. In conclusion, though Alexander attempted to reform many aspects of Russia, he only did it at 'limited measures' and during his reign there was very little reform in financial policies, the poll tax is a key example. It was a heavy burden on the peasants but gentry were exempt from which caused grief and unrest between the civil classes. As a result of Alexander's reforms many people began to revolt and oppose his rule. Revolts were also caused by the bad harvests, when there was low morale due to the lack of food and increase risk of disease. Even though Alexander II introduced many reforms, none of them were entirely successful in bringing about reform in Russia as he didn't actually change anything, just adapted the structure of rule that was already standing. This probably explains why he was assassinated in 1881. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Does Alexander II deserve the title of 'Tsar liberator'?

    However, despite a clear need for emancipation, it is perhaps understandable that much of the nobility ? who owned serfs- were resistant to this reason and were reluctant to support Alexander?s first steps towards liberating the serfs. In Alexander?s speech to the Moscow nobility, in March of 1856, Alexander proclaims,

  2. Henry II (1154 - 1189) is generally seen as the main catalyst in the ...

    notorious for levels of crime even by the standards of the day.65 Henry's rising resentment over Church law remained fairly static, even though his failed attempts to limit powers of clergy. Although Henry had the right of intervention in matters requiring his presence in order to deal with the crimes of lollardy and witchcraft.

  1. How Successful Were the Reforms of Alexander II?

    All peasants were now able to buy land of their landlords. This system worked by paying the landlord an advance payment, and the recovering of it from the peasants in "rescue expenses". The creation of Zemstvos marked another of his reforms.

  2. How far do you agree that Alexander II brought successful reform to Russia?

    I agree with the view of Seton-Watson, as I believe Alexander's reign did "begin with a bright promise" but later fell down due to the fact that he had his own ideas but had nothing to show for his efforts.

  1. Reasons for Reform - Russia, Alexander II.

    When the details of the Emancipation Act were made public there were many peasant riots between 1861 and 1853. The thought of paying for land they believed they already owned appalled most peasants. Also the land settlement sold less land to the peasants than they had used before 1861 and at very high prices.

  2. How successful were Peels social and economic reforms between 1841 and 1846?

    However questions must be asked about the overall effectiveness of these social policies, and the way in which they were passed. Firstly, Peel was said to have little interest in social policy, and it has been previously said that it was high influential, effective members of Peel?s government and peel

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work