• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Chamberlain's behaviour during the Czech crisis of September 1938 reveals that Chamberlain was not the dupe of Hitler but a shrewd politician

Extracts from this document...


How far do you agree that Chamberlains behaviour during the Czech crisis of September 1938 reveals that 'Chamberlain was not the dupe of Hitler but a shrewd politician' (Source 7, lines 1-2)? This matter is often debated among historians. Orthodox historians shortly after war mainly say Chamberlain was duped, because Britain was dragged into a war shortly after the crisis, whereas Revisionist Historians say he was shrewd and knew what he was doing. Source 7 says Chamberlain knew what he was doing and had one of two aims about postponing war. Source 8 says that although Chamberlain was happy, he had been duped. Source 9 agrees on the majority with source 1 and says that Chamberlain knew what he was doing, and used the time created by the Czech crisis effectively, therefore was shrewd. The fact that sources 7 and 9 agree suggest that Chamberlain was shrewd, and not duped. ...read more.


In Source 9, Hurd states that Chamberlain was 'driven by a determination to avoid war', and as is now known this did not happen. It could then be said that Chamberlain had been duped by Hitler because he had aimed for one thing, but achieved another. However it is seen in Source 7 and also in Source 9, that Chamberlain's secondary aim was to delay war for as long as possible, and then to win the war if there was one. Chamberlain also began a rearmament process in Britain suggesting he knew war was almost inevitable, and therefore had been planning for it. Britain introduced conscription in April 1939 and had begun rearmament in 1934. Britain had also abandoned a major part of its foreign policy, The 10 Year Rule. All of this evidence suggests that Chamberlain was shrewd in his actions, and not duped by Hitler. Source 8 says that Hitler 'gave up very little of his proclaimed demands' which suggests that if Chamberlain thought he had achieved lasting peace at Munich then he was indeed duped by Hitler's false assurances. ...read more.


Source 9 also largely contradicts Source 7 by implying that Chamberlain was not actually doing a deal to buy time or because of the moral merits of the case for his benefit, but because he wanted peace almost at any price and he had fooled himself into believing that it was possible. This is seen when Chamberlain got Hitler to sign the declaration of peaceful intent on 30th September, and Chamberlain came away believing war had been avoided, when just a year later Germany invaded Poland. Chamberlain can be seen here to have been duped, although it can still be argued that Chamberlain did not stop rearmament, or prevent conscription, suggesting there was an element of shrewdness. Therefore, in conclusion, Chamberlain was shrewd, as he managed to achieve his aim of postponing war and denying Hitler his war. However the extent to which he was shrewd is limited because he left Hitler's demands unchanged, and ultimately he believed many lies that Hitler told him. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    'Wolsey's foreign policy reveals that he had no other aims than to exalt his ...

    4 star(s)

    Certainly one must not forget that ultimately Henry held the power of life or death over Wolsey and this gross difference is evident in Wolsey's fall from power in 1529. Wolsey's level of responsibility was however unusual, since not only was he the lord chancellor, papal legate, cardinal and the

  2. How far do you agree with Elton's interpretation of the roles of Somerset and ...

    Therefore we must conclude that Northumberland was an apt politician, though certainly not anywhere near a political genius as we must recognise that he was able to learn from Somerset's reign. It is possible to argue on the exact political abilities of Northumberland and how much advantage hindsight afforded him; however, the fact remains that his achievements were positive.

  1. Death is Part of the Process

    OK, stop the van." Danny took the headset off. He carried the laptop to the open back of the van. He pointed to the long dark bulk of the nearest building. Brick-built. Five storeys high, its front striped by grey balconies. "He's in there," Danny called to the two officers.

  2. Was Edith's Behaviour Unreasonable?

    Anna obliges and this is where Edith becomes involved in the relationship with Anna and Charles. After she reads the letter Anna then asks her to reply to it because she was illiterate. Edith then agrees to reply to the letter as long as she only wrote what Anna tells her.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work