• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Hitler became chancellor in January 1933 primarily due to electoral success of the Nazi party?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How far do you agree that Hitler became chancellor in January 1933 primarily due to electoral success of the Nazi party? The electoral success of the Nazi party played a key role in Hitler rising to power but was not the most important idea about why he became chancellor of Germany. The crucial reason, was the fact that in 1933 Franz Von Papen had a grudge against Paul Von Hindenburg after Hindenburg replaced him with a Chancellor. In the 1928 election, Hitler and The NSDAP had gained only 2.8% worth of the votes. This showed that there was still faith in democracy from the Weimar Republic. Despite this, in the 1932 elections, only four years later. The Nazi's had achieved a 37% lead, making them the largest political party in the Weimar republic. We can see that The Nazi party had convinced a large proportion of Germany that it was the saviour of the people. This showed political leaders such as President Paul Von Hindenburg, that Hitler was a possibility for running the country. This meant that when Franz Von Papen was looking for a figurehead that he could manipulate in to running the country his way in 1933. Hitler seemed like the perfect candidate. ...read more.

Middle

This grudge was the main reason that Hitler managed to gain power. If Von Pappen had no desire to be in power, and this grudge never existed then it would be most likely that Hitler would have never become chancellor and so German History may have looked very different. Another reason why Hitler was made Chancellor was a piece of legislature known as 'Article 48.' This was part of the Weimar constitution that allowed the president to take emergency power in conjunction with the Chancellor and was allowed to make decisions and pass laws without the support of the Reichstag. After the wall street crash in 1929 The president, Paul Von Hindenburg decided that the economic decline was classed as an emergency. This allowed the president to choose the president he wanted to appoint. As a result of this, politicians were able to get in to government without a majority support from the Reichstag. This allowed Von Pappen to convince the president that Hitler was the best man for the job despite the fact that Hitler did not have support from the Reichstag. As well as this, due to the fact the president had been using the rights of Article 48 for so long, it made a mockery of democracy, showing people and the Reichstag that perhaps this dictatorship was the best idea. ...read more.

Conclusion

This was due to the fact that the most influential people in Germany (The economic elite and high ranking politicians) risked losing all of their money and power and possibly be executed if the communists did take over. This meant that they would do everything they could to stop this. This point is backed up by the fact that Von Hindenburg was more willing to sign ?The ruthless confrontation of the Communist Party of Germany" after the Reichstag fire. Even though the communists were seen as a major threat to the rich in germany. Hitler became Chancellor independant to these circumstances and was only until later in his term that this fear would be vital. Overall I Agree to a point that electoral suceess of the Nazi party was the primary reason of why they got in to power. It was an important component as without it then they would not even have been considered for any position of power, but if we look at the situatuation as a whole then we can clearly see that it was Von Pappen that drew together all of these factors in his plan against Hindenburg. Without von pappen then The Nazis would have been kept away from office by Von Hindenburg and the Germany would carry on without them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * He announced his willingness to pay subsidies on an unprecedented scale to any ally willing to provide the troops needed to fight Napoleon on the continent, but neither Russia, Austria nor Prussia came forward. * Austria and Russia were both anxious to see Napoleon defeated, but were not prepared

  2. How far was the holocaust a long term plan of nazi racial policy?

    Henig supports the fact that the Madagascar plan was still the Nazis main plan in terms of dealing with the Jews by citing a diary entry by Goebbels on 17th April 1940 where he states that the Nazis are still intent on shipping the Jews to Madagascar.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    Confronted by incriminating evidence, many dodged behind a series of rationalizations. The most popular was that they merely followed orders and that Hitler or Himmler was really the guilty one. It was, of course, convenient for the top Nazis, as it was to some degree for all Germans, to blame

  2. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    This links to the other reason Collectivisation was important in the battle for leadership. Although Trotsky's quote claims Lenin's use of the bureaucracy was for the people, it is evident as I have argued that War Communism and 'Dictatorship of the Proletariat," were both forms of elite control in order to aid the revolution.

  1. The Main Reason for the Rise of the Nazi Party to Power in 1933 ...

    He would tell them what he was going to do, (get them jobs, stop hyperinflation, etc) but fail to mention how exactly he intended to do it, but this did not matter. People believed him and they loved him for what he was saying about how he was planning to fix Germany.

  2. To vote for Hitler was above all a rejection of the existing system. Is ...

    This would have also been down to the fact the economic crisis had improved with the change in currency and the appointment of Stresemann. The improvement in the economic situation meant that the public had more confidence in the Weimar Republic and they had little cause to look towards other political leaders.

  1. 'How far do you agree that Hitler was primarily responsible for causing WWII?'

    This was the first step backwards against all the good work the LON had done before and resulted in the adverse effect of increased suspicions and other countries rearming in anticipation of conflicts. , the failure of the United States and the Soviet Union to play an active role in peacekeeping in LON also hindered its effectiveness.

  2. Nazi consolidation of power in 1933 was primarily due to their use of violence ...

    method used in a series of situations and wasn?t to be a limited method used by the Nazis. The method of terror being effective is also shown in the way that on the 5th March, an election had a high turnout of 88 per cent, suggesting that the violent actions

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work