• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'How far do you agree that Hitler was primarily responsible for causing WWII?'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'How far do you agree that Hitler was primarily responsible for causing WWII?' World War 2 was a global military conflict which involved all the great powers, as suggested in the title , the role of Hitler is debatable for its importance however to assess this one must observe the other intertwined causes .I , personally agree to a large extent that Hitler was primarily responsible for causing WW2. In my essay I have divided these causes into 3 large themes, the failure of collective security and enforcement of peace (with respect to the great powers), Economic weakness in Europe and finally the role of Hitler, his ideology and final miscalculation at Poland. From the very end of World War 1, upon the severe Treaty of Versailles (TOV) there was huge resentment and humiliation which the German people faced , the treaty was generally regarded as to harsh, the great powers of France Britain and America slowly gave concessions to Germany, the young plan , dawes plan reduced reparations significantly , large American lending undermined their TOV, improving Germany's condition greatly yet not removing the deep feelings of resentment . A second point is the failure of the League of Nations (LON) ...read more.

Middle

This policy allowed Hitler freedom to act first and then offer concessions and discuss after. He also took over Austria , then Czechoslovakia at the Munich agreement under the pretext of "Lebensraum" (living space) for Germans . Britain and France adopted this policy especially towards Germany also for the fact that it saw Germany as an enemy against Communism. Their increased appeasement to Germany resulted in increased tension and their failure to win support from the Soviet Union , whereas Hitler took full advantage and created the Nazi Soviet Pact. Economically the European Powers were greatly weakened after WW2 and compounded by the Great Depression. This engendered a growing mood of resentment and disillusionment with the capitalist system in general and with the more powerful trading economies such resentment was expressed in ideas of self sufficiency or autarky. This led to protectionist and isolationist policies which undermined collective action and cooperation. It stimulated the desire for empire building from the "have not" countries who resented the fact that Britain and France could fall back on their empire. Also the fear of Japan, Italy and Germany asserting their right to empires had the effect of sharpening conflicts over markets and raw materials, undermining economic cooperation and once again arousing dreams of imperial conquest. ...read more.

Conclusion

It too was Hitler's miscalculation of British and French actions with respect to Poland which was the immediate cause of WW2. Hitler thought the Munich Agreement hag given him the green light and thus over confidence set in. Simultaneously Britain and France realised that Appeasement had failed and in a favourable set of international and domestic conditions. In conclusion, I agree that Hitler was primarily responsible for the cause of WW2 to a large extent as the other causes although important, are understandable or justified. America which had helped out greatly in WW1 had to respect its people's feelings to stay out of European affairs and this caused the ineffectiveness of the LON as a peacekeeping organisation as it had little strength for the task. Economically, the route taken of Autarky and empire building was seen as necessary at the time and the Policy of Appeasement was virtually compulsory due to economic difficulties , lack of military strength and guilt of such a harsh peace treaty . However Hitler's actions were fuelled by passion , unnecessary egotistical , Nationalistic actions , similar to his decision to exterminate millions of Jews , his international policies , decisions were uncalled for , indeed without his pressure on Poland , war would not have happened. Jonathan Taylor 5. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far do you agree that Hitler became Chancellor primarily due to political intrigue?

    3 star(s)

    Von Papen told Hitler that he could get Hitler into power If Schleicher could be vice-chancellor. Political intrigue was fast at work and Von Papen quickly began looking for support from capitalists and the army.

  2. To what extent was German Unification driven by primarily economic forces?

    It is important to consider that many liberals wanted liberal reform not unification. The movement for nationalism was not particularly strong because the power in the German States lied with autocratic monarchs not liberal assemblies hence the movement for nationalism was more idealistic than practical because few liberals had the

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    The leading member - Bukharin whose criticism of Stalin's economic polices sealed his fate he was executed in 1935. 2. They were accused of forming a 'Trotskyite- Rightist Bloc' 3. Bukharin was a threat to Stalin because of his outspoken criticisms of Stalin's Economic policies.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    In the air the Allies were quite inferior to the Germans (1000 French and 700 British planes in France). The Allied generals firmly expected the Germans to repeat the Schlieffen Plan of 1914 and invade France through the flatlands of Belgium.

  1. The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust. How valid is this assessment ...

    Feuchtwanger was an academic historian who studied History at the University of Southampton. As a secondary piece of literature it is very valid as Feuchtwanger's opinion as a structuralist is held in high esteem. The book specialises in Germany in the period 1916-1941, this shows that Feuchtwanger was primarily focused

  2. The Treaty of Versailles: Prelude to WWII

    had to make his people happy, and the British people wanted punishment for war damages. The Prime Minister of France, Georges Clemenceau, wanted to cripple Germany for the damage done to France during the war. He was worried that if Germany wasn't punished enough they would recover and attack France

  1. The Role Of Women in WW2

    However, this was odd because women were allowed to track a plane, fuse the shells and be there when the firing cord was pulled. In contrast to the Auxiliary Territorial Service, women who joined the air force had more opportunities for more exciting jobs such as working on Spitfires.

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    Kristallnacht is a key example of this and shows how the extremist and chaotic nature of the Nazi party could lead to mass destruction. Something which most definitely undermines the importance of the Wannsee Conference is that the extermination camps had been constructed long before the meeting ever took place.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work