• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'How far do you agree that Hitler was primarily responsible for causing WWII?'

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'How far do you agree that Hitler was primarily responsible for causing WWII?' World War 2 was a global military conflict which involved all the great powers, as suggested in the title , the role of Hitler is debatable for its importance however to assess this one must observe the other intertwined causes .I , personally agree to a large extent that Hitler was primarily responsible for causing WW2. In my essay I have divided these causes into 3 large themes, the failure of collective security and enforcement of peace (with respect to the great powers), Economic weakness in Europe and finally the role of Hitler, his ideology and final miscalculation at Poland. From the very end of World War 1, upon the severe Treaty of Versailles (TOV) there was huge resentment and humiliation which the German people faced , the treaty was generally regarded as to harsh, the great powers of France Britain and America slowly gave concessions to Germany, the young plan , dawes plan reduced reparations significantly , large American lending undermined their TOV, improving Germany's condition greatly yet not removing the deep feelings of resentment . A second point is the failure of the League of Nations (LON) ...read more.

Middle

This policy allowed Hitler freedom to act first and then offer concessions and discuss after. He also took over Austria , then Czechoslovakia at the Munich agreement under the pretext of "Lebensraum" (living space) for Germans . Britain and France adopted this policy especially towards Germany also for the fact that it saw Germany as an enemy against Communism. Their increased appeasement to Germany resulted in increased tension and their failure to win support from the Soviet Union , whereas Hitler took full advantage and created the Nazi Soviet Pact. Economically the European Powers were greatly weakened after WW2 and compounded by the Great Depression. This engendered a growing mood of resentment and disillusionment with the capitalist system in general and with the more powerful trading economies such resentment was expressed in ideas of self sufficiency or autarky. This led to protectionist and isolationist policies which undermined collective action and cooperation. It stimulated the desire for empire building from the "have not" countries who resented the fact that Britain and France could fall back on their empire. Also the fear of Japan, Italy and Germany asserting their right to empires had the effect of sharpening conflicts over markets and raw materials, undermining economic cooperation and once again arousing dreams of imperial conquest. ...read more.

Conclusion

It too was Hitler's miscalculation of British and French actions with respect to Poland which was the immediate cause of WW2. Hitler thought the Munich Agreement hag given him the green light and thus over confidence set in. Simultaneously Britain and France realised that Appeasement had failed and in a favourable set of international and domestic conditions. In conclusion, I agree that Hitler was primarily responsible for the cause of WW2 to a large extent as the other causes although important, are understandable or justified. America which had helped out greatly in WW1 had to respect its people's feelings to stay out of European affairs and this caused the ineffectiveness of the LON as a peacekeeping organisation as it had little strength for the task. Economically, the route taken of Autarky and empire building was seen as necessary at the time and the Policy of Appeasement was virtually compulsory due to economic difficulties , lack of military strength and guilt of such a harsh peace treaty . However Hitler's actions were fuelled by passion , unnecessary egotistical , Nationalistic actions , similar to his decision to exterminate millions of Jews , his international policies , decisions were uncalled for , indeed without his pressure on Poland , war would not have happened. Jonathan Taylor 5. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How far do you agree that Hitler became Chancellor primarily due to political intrigue?

    3 star(s)

    to his position as chancellor, considered using article 48 of the Weimar constitution to dissolve the Reichstag and to establish a presidential dictatorship in Germany. This concerned Schleicher greatly who informed the President of his fears, and Hindenburg reluctantly asked Von Papen to step down and to hand over the chancellorship to Schleicher.

  2. Was appeasement justified?

    Peace would have been secured. It was the right policy because...Britain wasn't ready for war: Chamberlain's defenders say it was the only policy available to him.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    But the French statesmen, who regarded France as the heart of the anti-German coalition, to move to Africa appeared absurd and Churchillian rhetoric a counsel of despair. with the fall of France, they were firmly convinced, the war would be over.

  2. Why was the league so ineffective in dealing with the Abyssinian Crisis?

    The question that the league had to take was what to do with Italy if they took this action. The problem that the league had was that the action they took depended on the actions of the French and the British who were the two great powers in the league

  1. Causes of show trials + purges of 1930s.

    Following the war political prisoners were released, censorship was relaxed, tax arrears were cancelled, serfdom was abolished and some of the liberties of Poland and of the Catholic Church were restored. The Crimean war had also illustrated faults in the social and governmental system of Russia which Alexander tried to

  2. The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust. How valid is this assessment ...

    The interpretation that the Wannsee Conference was solely responsible for the Holocaust could be considered valid if you consider the attempts that the Nazi's tried to make to get rid of the Jewish people in the early war years. One idea that suggests the National Socialists were not intending to

  1. The Treaty of Versailles: Prelude to WWII

    There were different views from the leaders on what to include in the treaty. David Lloyd George, the British Prime Minister, did not want to punish Germany too harshly for fear of future troubles and also wanted to restore trade with her2, but election time was coming up so he

  2. "The Wannsee Conference was entirely responsible for the Holocaust" How valid is this assessment ...

    Even though the Einsatzgruppen had taken a ruthless approach to the invasion of the Soviet Union it could still be added to brutalities of war, exempt from the Nazi party's official policy. Perhaps Wannsee can be seen as responsible for the beginning of the Holocaust.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work