• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that ideological rivalry between the superpowers was primarily responsible for both the origin of the Cold War and for its continuance to1956?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that ideological rivalry between the superpowers was primarily responsible for both the origin of the Cold War and for its continuance to 1956? Certainly, the ideological rivalry that existed between the East and the West, concerning Communism and Capitalism was the largest factor to fuel the lengthy cold war, but there were other smaller factors that inflamed the conflict and ensured its continuance. Almost all of these factors can be drawn back to the fundamental contradictory ideologies and most of which were reactions against the other's respective policies, such as Comecome was the Soviet response to the Truman doctrine/ Marshall Aid, and the Warsaw Pact a reaction to the creation of NATO. As the Second World War came to an end in 1945 it became clear that pre-war revulsion for the respective ideologies was ready to once again rear its ugly head. The war time association between the US and the Soviet Union had existed simply to unite against an enemy that if faced alone, neither could have overthrown. By 1945 it was obvious that Hitler and Nazi Germany were reaching the end of their powerful and destructive lifetime. With the downfall of their enemy, the two superpowers had no common ground and were therefore left to return to their nations and their respective pre-war international policies. ...read more.

Middle

Suspicion of the West thus came to be deeply embedded in the Bolshevik mentality; the West was the enemy against which Bolshevism defined its identity. It was therefore, essentially, a 'reactive' identity; Soviet socialism, constructed as a protest against Western capitalism, was 'an anti-world to Capitalism' (Kotkin 1995). Personality clashes between the two superpower leaders, Stalin and any of the US Presidents once again comes back to their completely opposing ideological beliefs and their individual fears of the other's possible world domination. So when Stalin died in 1953 it was unclear how, or even if, Soviet politics could maintain its hard-line policies both internationally against America and internally. However, in 1956 Khrushchev, the new Soviet leader made his famous secret speech, clearly criticizing Stalin this, almost even more clearly than even Stalin's death, signified the end of Stalinism. Khrushchev's appointment marked the end of the relationship between Stalin and the West. Brimming with positive ideas for 'peaceful coexistence', and a much larger power base than Stalin's dictatorship ever allowed, the relationship between Khrushchev and the west began, and that's a whole other story. The Cold War was an ideological and geographical struggle between two opposing systems. Equally important, it was a struggle that took place during the first fifty years of the nuclear age, and the existence of nuclear weapons greatly affected the nature of the struggle. ...read more.

Conclusion

I fully agree that fundamentally the cold war was a confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union, fuelled on both sides by the belief that the ideology of the other side had to be destroyed. It is because of this that co-existence was not possible- one side could only win at the expense of the other, no matter how long either side had to wait for their victory, the ideological hatred ran so deep that both sides that neither side was prepared to jeopardize their own way of life for the benefit of the other. The Soviet Union held to Lenin's belief that conflict between communism and capitalism was 'inevitable'. The United States believed that peace and stability in the world would only emerge when the evil of communism had been exorcised. At the ideological level Moscow's communist world-view, which saw capitalism as absolute evil, fed off Washington's world-view, which saw communism as an absolute evil, and in this way helped to sustain the others prophecy. Every action that either power took was followed by an almost immediate reaction from the other, the continuation of the Cold War not only until 1956 but until the Soviet Unions downfall in 1970/80s, was continually fueled by actions and reactions which were sometimes insignificant but which also brought the world closer than ever to a full scale nuclear war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War?

    that the USA was planning to adopt a long-term hard-line stance when it came to the USSR. Nonetheless, one of the most crucial consequences of the Berlin blockade was that it triggered the official beginning of the arms race. I think that this can be almost entirely blamed on the

  2. Who was responsible for the start of the Cold war?

    as, "Mankind's ideological evolution" in which ultimately Capitalism flourished along with its ideas of Free trade based upon the principal of survival of the fittest. Arguing this course, it is perhaps more logical to argue that instead Winston Churchill's Iron Curtain speech in Missouri (March 5.

  1. This graduation paper is about U.S. - Soviet relations in Cold War period. Our ...

    with them peacefully for as far into the future as any of us could imagine." In fact, two disquietingly different perceptions of the Soviet Union existed as the war drew to an end. Some Washington officials believed that the mystery of Russia was no mystery at all, simply a reflection

  2. Analyse the role of Germany in the origin and development of the Cold War ...

    All these arguments and suspicions created around Germany contributed to the building up of suspicion and the growing bad relations between both sides.

  1. How far was Truman personally responsible for the development of the Cold War?

    The Marshall Plan was put forward on 5 June 1947. Stalin viewed Marshall Aid with suspicion. After expressing some initial interest, he refused to have anything more to do with it. The 'security dilemma' now being faced by the US, France and Britain was that these efforts to secure themselves

  2. The Cold War was a big rivalry that developed after World War II.

    proposal to control nuclear energy production and research. The Soviet Union believed the United States had a lead in nuclear weapons. The 2 Soviet Union accused the United States of planning a third world war. In the fall of 1946, Greek Communists went against the Greek government. The United Kingdom had been giving military and economic aid to Greece.

  1. The most important cause of the Cold War was the suspicion and rivalry between ...

    Also Stalin was believed to be another dictator like Hitler, and the 1930s had shown that appeasement did not work. This distrust was the basis of America/USSR rivalry and lead to other differences and disagreements before the Cold War. One of the main areas of disagreement between America (and her allies)

  2. How far do you agree with the view that the origins of the Cold ...

    When under the circumstances that would allow these two competing views to be executed, it was likely that conflict would ensue, as it did, in the form of a Cold War between the two powers. However, it is the inherent hostility that divided the USSR and the US, which was

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work