• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Stalin paid more attention to the practical rather than to the ideological aspects of soviet foreign policy in the years 1929 to 1941

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Homework: Essay Question How far do you agree that Stalin paid more attention to the practical rather than to the ideological aspects of soviet foreign policy in the years 1929 to 1941? By the end of 1928, Stalin had broken away from Lenin's new economic policy and started the first of his own five year plans, as well as collectivisation and heavy industrialisation. In February 1931, he made a prediction that the USSR was '50 to 100 years behind the advanced countries', but Russia had to make this up in 10 years or 'go under'. Stalin wanted to delay what he viewed as an inevitable war for ultimately as long as possible. So to achieve everything in 10 years and for the Soviet Union apparently needing to catch up with the West, Stalin arguably didn't care if his foreign policy seemed in check with Communism, or not. ...read more.

Middle

This can be seen as an ideological policy as Russia are trying to reject fascism, though also trying to be practical as Russia needed Britain, France and the USA to unite to get rid of Hitler. However, the Comintern had turned from being extreme to suddenly becoming far more tolerant of non-communist countries than before, showing a break away from ideology. In addition, by the end it was only the USSR that took a stand in trying to preserve the Second Spanish Republic, and its Popular Front government, from the Fascist rebellion of 1936, though no attempt at communist revolution was made there. The USSR also interpreted not being invited to the Munich conference of 1938 as a deliberate statement against communism. War was becoming increasingly likely, and the USSR and Stalin seemed to be moving further and further away from implementing the ideology (in terms of foreign affairs) ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, it can maybe be argued that aligning with either of the 'imperialist blocs' would have been un-ideological, so maybe which one didn't matter to an extent. After signing the Pact, Stalin then sat back to watch the slaughter as the fascist and the democratic capitalists made mincemeat of each other before eventually being forced to enter the war himself. Therefore, to conclude, ideology was clearly ignored generally during the build up to World War II. Without any other countries that were communist, foreign policy slowly went to accepting other nations and then aligning with other nations, such as Germany, who represented completely different belief's to Stalin's. However, as War came closer, the need to improve the Soviet Union's defense became very important, and ideology became less. Britain and France went from ignoring the USSR at the Munich conference, to talks for a 'triple alliance' against Germany, showing how the build up to war changed other countries foreign perspectives. World War II ultimately wasn't concerning communism at all, and this gradually led to the USSR preparing far more for this War then implementing following the ideology. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    Stalin must have come across these contradictions in Marx's writings, which suggests he had very little idea of what the Communist ideology contributed to the policy of Collectivisation and social engineering and whether it was a class war, or simply a war on peasants.

  2. How far did Stalin manage to modernize Russia by 1938?

    a huge imbalance between sectors, which undoubtedly created a gaping social problem. Despite the successes, the Five Year Plans were largely unplanned and unrealistic. It is a known fact that the Vesenkha and the Gosplan were competing as to who would set the highest targets.

  1. Hitlers Germany

    and was at its core not a mere genocide (V´┐Żlkermord), but was really a reaction born out of the anxiety of the annihilating occurrences of the Russian Revolution."" Such speculations can only trivialize the Nazi experience and, by so doing, play into the hands of racist revisionists who argue that

  2. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    Workers that did not meet their targets or failed to work a full amount of time in a factory were dealt with severely. First offence of absenteeism was heavily punished with fines, loss of ration cards and/or dismissal. The punishment for a second offence was prison and a forced labour camp.

  1. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    I would conclude that Lenin did make a difference because without him, people would not of got what he wanted; the Bolshevik coup would of failed. He did some think different, he listened to the people, he found out what they wanted and helped them, where as other leaders wouldn't, hey would of done it their way.

  2. Russia 1905 - 1941

    The second of these plans focused on improving the transport and the production of machinery. The third and final 5 year plan was launched in 1938. This plan concentrated on the production of household goods such as radios bicycles and other such luxuries.

  1. How far do you agree that Mussolini's foreign policy was a failure from the ...

    Italy but Mussolini was more concerned with the prestige of allying with Europe?s most potent power rather than the politics of it. This was a formal military alliance between Italy and Germany securing support for each other. War was inevitable for Germany and by signing this pact it became inevitable for Italy too.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    as much of their produce as they could ? bags of grain. The authorities raised only about 4/5 of their target figures and ended up directly requisitioning the grain. Peasants complained that although the NEP was better than War Communism, they were taxed more than they had been under the Tsar.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work