• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Stalin paid more attention to the practical rather than to the ideological aspects of soviet foreign policy in the years 1929 to 1941

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Homework: Essay Question How far do you agree that Stalin paid more attention to the practical rather than to the ideological aspects of soviet foreign policy in the years 1929 to 1941? By the end of 1928, Stalin had broken away from Lenin's new economic policy and started the first of his own five year plans, as well as collectivisation and heavy industrialisation. In February 1931, he made a prediction that the USSR was '50 to 100 years behind the advanced countries', but Russia had to make this up in 10 years or 'go under'. Stalin wanted to delay what he viewed as an inevitable war for ultimately as long as possible. So to achieve everything in 10 years and for the Soviet Union apparently needing to catch up with the West, Stalin arguably didn't care if his foreign policy seemed in check with Communism, or not. ...read more.

Middle

This can be seen as an ideological policy as Russia are trying to reject fascism, though also trying to be practical as Russia needed Britain, France and the USA to unite to get rid of Hitler. However, the Comintern had turned from being extreme to suddenly becoming far more tolerant of non-communist countries than before, showing a break away from ideology. In addition, by the end it was only the USSR that took a stand in trying to preserve the Second Spanish Republic, and its Popular Front government, from the Fascist rebellion of 1936, though no attempt at communist revolution was made there. The USSR also interpreted not being invited to the Munich conference of 1938 as a deliberate statement against communism. War was becoming increasingly likely, and the USSR and Stalin seemed to be moving further and further away from implementing the ideology (in terms of foreign affairs) ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, it can maybe be argued that aligning with either of the 'imperialist blocs' would have been un-ideological, so maybe which one didn't matter to an extent. After signing the Pact, Stalin then sat back to watch the slaughter as the fascist and the democratic capitalists made mincemeat of each other before eventually being forced to enter the war himself. Therefore, to conclude, ideology was clearly ignored generally during the build up to World War II. Without any other countries that were communist, foreign policy slowly went to accepting other nations and then aligning with other nations, such as Germany, who represented completely different belief's to Stalin's. However, as War came closer, the need to improve the Soviet Union's defense became very important, and ideology became less. Britain and France went from ignoring the USSR at the Munich conference, to talks for a 'triple alliance' against Germany, showing how the build up to war changed other countries foreign perspectives. World War II ultimately wasn't concerning communism at all, and this gradually led to the USSR preparing far more for this War then implementing following the ideology. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Hitlers Germany

    preceded us - decisions, of course, that can and sometimes must be reversed if they are demonstrably unworkable or harmful. Most decent Germans today have seen the need of accepting a corporate responsibility for what was done in the name of Germany by the Nazis, which does not involve collective

  2. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    But unlike Manchuria the League could no longer use the excuse that Abyssinia was too far away. France had begun to become friendlier towards Mussolini seeking allies against the growing threat of Hitler. Mussolini said he would be anti-Nazi if France would support Italy's invasion into Abyssinia.

  1. 'PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS OUTWEIGHED IDEOLOGY IN FOREIGN POLICY' IN RELATION TO GERMANY IN THE YEARS ...

    Also this pact allowed him to buy time as he deceived his opponents. Hitler here shows himself being a master of seized opportunities. Historian Kershaw believed Hitler had a 'gambler's instinct' and he would 'take the initiative'. Bullock believed Hitler had a 'consistency of aim joined with opportunism method'.

  2. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    In context Deutscher's view, was still dependent on a very small source of information, most of which was reminiscent of the 1930's and very 'pro-Stalin'. Therefore the quote is still of limited use due to its lack of analytical scope.

  1. 'In the years 1933-37, German foreign policy was essentially nationalist rather than specifically Nazi'. ...

    as well as the industrialists and the population who wanted a return of German prestige. In isolation, protecting the interests of his own country was certainly nationalist, but Hitler had used the changing thoughts of the British government (who had suggested that Germany was not solely responsible for the First World War)

  2. How far has nationalism changed over the last hundred years?

    The image forwarded by the Kaiser at this time was that of a blatant determination to out class the rest of Europe in terms of military strength and economic prowess. The Weltpolitik outlined Germany's intentions to raise morale within her infrastructure from the working classes to the aristocracy and it worked.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    As the inefficient companies lost money, more and more workers were cut. By the mid-1920s, industrial production had risen slightly compared to the 1921 figures, but in most cases it still hadn?t reached pre-1913 levels. Workers were unmotivated and had to work outdated machinery meaning that productivity fell.

  2. How far do you agree that Mussolini's foreign policy was a failure from the ...

    Mussolini?s intervention of this war was to achieve dominance over the Mediterranean, to spread fascism abroad, stop French left-wing influence in Spain and to gain an ally in a strategic area. In the battle of Guadalajara, in March 1937, Italian troops were defeated and 400 soldiers were killed and 1,800

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work