• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Stalin paid more attention to the practical rather than to the ideological aspects of soviet foreign policy in the years 1929 to 1941

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Homework: Essay Question How far do you agree that Stalin paid more attention to the practical rather than to the ideological aspects of soviet foreign policy in the years 1929 to 1941? By the end of 1928, Stalin had broken away from Lenin's new economic policy and started the first of his own five year plans, as well as collectivisation and heavy industrialisation. In February 1931, he made a prediction that the USSR was '50 to 100 years behind the advanced countries', but Russia had to make this up in 10 years or 'go under'. Stalin wanted to delay what he viewed as an inevitable war for ultimately as long as possible. So to achieve everything in 10 years and for the Soviet Union apparently needing to catch up with the West, Stalin arguably didn't care if his foreign policy seemed in check with Communism, or not. ...read more.

Middle

This can be seen as an ideological policy as Russia are trying to reject fascism, though also trying to be practical as Russia needed Britain, France and the USA to unite to get rid of Hitler. However, the Comintern had turned from being extreme to suddenly becoming far more tolerant of non-communist countries than before, showing a break away from ideology. In addition, by the end it was only the USSR that took a stand in trying to preserve the Second Spanish Republic, and its Popular Front government, from the Fascist rebellion of 1936, though no attempt at communist revolution was made there. The USSR also interpreted not being invited to the Munich conference of 1938 as a deliberate statement against communism. War was becoming increasingly likely, and the USSR and Stalin seemed to be moving further and further away from implementing the ideology (in terms of foreign affairs) ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, it can maybe be argued that aligning with either of the 'imperialist blocs' would have been un-ideological, so maybe which one didn't matter to an extent. After signing the Pact, Stalin then sat back to watch the slaughter as the fascist and the democratic capitalists made mincemeat of each other before eventually being forced to enter the war himself. Therefore, to conclude, ideology was clearly ignored generally during the build up to World War II. Without any other countries that were communist, foreign policy slowly went to accepting other nations and then aligning with other nations, such as Germany, who represented completely different belief's to Stalin's. However, as War came closer, the need to improve the Soviet Union's defense became very important, and ideology became less. Britain and France went from ignoring the USSR at the Munich conference, to talks for a 'triple alliance' against Germany, showing how the build up to war changed other countries foreign perspectives. World War II ultimately wasn't concerning communism at all, and this gradually led to the USSR preparing far more for this War then implementing following the ideology. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    their Five Year Plans and collectivisation, it is quite easy to see why some Russians would look back on Stalin's time with nostalgia, as it was commonly perceived as the time when the USSR had greatly increased its economic position and social pride.

  2. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    Despite this there is clear evidence that one of the big influences on Stalin's choice to collectivise was the way in which it would allow a more efficient requisitioning process, consequently injecting more food into the urban areas of Russia, which would help the USSR towards the ideological aim of creating a Communist workers utopia.

  1. Russia and the Soviet Union 1917-1924

    some different aims, some of them wanted to tsar back, some a military Dictator; others wanted revolutionary change. The only aim they had been in common was to defeat the Bolsheviks; they only agreed on little less. Leadership and unity Reds * Leader wise the reds had a great one, Trotsky.

  2. 'In the years 1933-37, German foreign policy was essentially nationalist rather than specifically Nazi'. ...

    Likewise, although expansion was not specifically Nazi in thought, Hitler was adamant that it could only be achieved through military means. As a result, his philosophy on expansion became more as a result of his Nazi policies, rather than through peaceful economic means as nationalist ideology can sometimes focus on.

  1. Russia 1905 - 1941

    He withstood the might of the Nazis and he industrialised Russia in 20 years, but he did this at the cost of millions of Russian lives. 4. Who do you think was the more important figure in Russian history, Lenin or Stalin.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    The government evacuated Paris, which was declared an open city and left undefended, and when the Germans entered it on June 13 they found it largely deserted. The population had panicked and fled by the thousands, clogging up the roads to the south and impeding the movements of the army

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    In contrast to this, state farms were much less productive, less well run and usually ran at a loss. It was this situation that led to the procurement crisis of 1928. For the previous years, there had been increasing confrontations between peasants.

  2. How far do you agree that Mussolini's foreign policy was a failure from the ...

    However, it gave the potential for a Fascist ally in the Mediterranean as Franco won, which was beneficial and one of the main aims. In 1937 to 1938 Mussolini introduced new anti-Semitism laws following the introduction of them in Germany; he did this to impress and please Hitler as a token of reinforcing their alliance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work