• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Stalin paid more attention to the practical rather than to the ideological aspects of soviet foreign policy in the years 1929 to 1941

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Homework: Essay Question How far do you agree that Stalin paid more attention to the practical rather than to the ideological aspects of soviet foreign policy in the years 1929 to 1941? By the end of 1928, Stalin had broken away from Lenin's new economic policy and started the first of his own five year plans, as well as collectivisation and heavy industrialisation. In February 1931, he made a prediction that the USSR was '50 to 100 years behind the advanced countries', but Russia had to make this up in 10 years or 'go under'. Stalin wanted to delay what he viewed as an inevitable war for ultimately as long as possible. So to achieve everything in 10 years and for the Soviet Union apparently needing to catch up with the West, Stalin arguably didn't care if his foreign policy seemed in check with Communism, or not. ...read more.

Middle

This can be seen as an ideological policy as Russia are trying to reject fascism, though also trying to be practical as Russia needed Britain, France and the USA to unite to get rid of Hitler. However, the Comintern had turned from being extreme to suddenly becoming far more tolerant of non-communist countries than before, showing a break away from ideology. In addition, by the end it was only the USSR that took a stand in trying to preserve the Second Spanish Republic, and its Popular Front government, from the Fascist rebellion of 1936, though no attempt at communist revolution was made there. The USSR also interpreted not being invited to the Munich conference of 1938 as a deliberate statement against communism. War was becoming increasingly likely, and the USSR and Stalin seemed to be moving further and further away from implementing the ideology (in terms of foreign affairs) ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, it can maybe be argued that aligning with either of the 'imperialist blocs' would have been un-ideological, so maybe which one didn't matter to an extent. After signing the Pact, Stalin then sat back to watch the slaughter as the fascist and the democratic capitalists made mincemeat of each other before eventually being forced to enter the war himself. Therefore, to conclude, ideology was clearly ignored generally during the build up to World War II. Without any other countries that were communist, foreign policy slowly went to accepting other nations and then aligning with other nations, such as Germany, who represented completely different belief's to Stalin's. However, as War came closer, the need to improve the Soviet Union's defense became very important, and ideology became less. Britain and France went from ignoring the USSR at the Munich conference, to talks for a 'triple alliance' against Germany, showing how the build up to war changed other countries foreign perspectives. World War II ultimately wasn't concerning communism at all, and this gradually led to the USSR preparing far more for this War then implementing following the ideology. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    It is difficult to say whether the USSR would have had the means or the equipment necessary to defeat the Nazi's were it not for the supplies and armaments built up at Stalin's explicit command. As it was, with the industry of Russia being so in tune with preparation for

  2. How far do David Low’s cartoons show the reasons for the failure of the ...

    Emperor Haile Selassie appealed to the League for help. Low first cartoon on this crisis for the League, appendix number 7, is showing how Britain and especially France were reluctant to do anything to stop Mussolini, because he signed the Stresa Pact.

  1. 'PRACTICAL CONSIDERATIONS OUTWEIGHED IDEOLOGY IN FOREIGN POLICY' IN RELATION TO GERMANY IN THE YEARS ...

    Hitler sensed in parts of Europe a mood of reluctance to risk war. The British believed that Germany had been treated too harshly by the provisions of Versailles and because of this; they were willing to make concessions to the Germans.

  2. Hitlers Germany

    war damages, and to embark upon a policy of reeducating the Germans along the political lines deemed appropriate by the occupying powers. Denazification proceeded by fits and starts between 1945 and 1950. It was clouded over by conflicting ideological aims; the Soviets, who had occupied most of eastern Germany, saw

  1. 'In the years 1933-37, German foreign policy was essentially nationalist rather than specifically Nazi'. ...

    Likewise, although expansion was not specifically Nazi in thought, Hitler was adamant that it could only be achieved through military means. As a result, his philosophy on expansion became more as a result of his Nazi policies, rather than through peaceful economic means as nationalist ideology can sometimes focus on.

  2. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    of many people' especially during the struggle for power, was the importance of Communism. Two examples would be those within the Soviets and lower party members. This shows how important it was for Stalin to implement Collectivisation, to increase the tempo of industrialisation and keep the main desire of these groups, the prosperity of Communism, fulfilled.

  1. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    However, at the same time, between 1925 and 1928, Russian agriculture showed considerable growth. 1. Land under cultivation increased by more than 25%, and in some areas, herds of cattle and horses by almost 33%. 2. Increasing prosperity ? this meant that more and more peasants fitted into the kulak bracket.

  2. How far do you agree that Mussolini's foreign policy was a failure from the ...

    wounded, 500 were taken prisoner and 25 artillery pieces, 10 mortars, 85 machine-guns and 67 trucks lost. This shows the extent of Italian losses and how weak the Italian army became from losing troops and resources in order to help Spain therefore making the intervention a severe failure.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work