• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Stalins Five-Year Plans (1929-1941) improved the Russian economy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that Stalin?s Five-Year Plans (1929-1941) improved the Russian economy? Stalin?s five year plans did improve the Russian economy due to heavy industry increased the production of steel, iron, oil and coal. However, the five year plan was unsuccessful in terms of consumer goods and labour productivity. Additionally, the plans did not fully succeed in fulfilling Stalin?s targets for war preparation. Heavy industry was successful in improving the economy primarily due to the first three five year plans. Evidently, Industries like coal steel and iron grew enormously. For instance Coal production in 1928 prior to the five year plan was 36million tonnes, and in 1932 it was 65 million tonnes. Furthermore, Magnitogorsk which was constructed during the first five year plan aided the trebling of steel production during the second year plan. ...read more.

Middle

Additionally, even though in the early 1934 bread rationing ended, in comparison to the 1920?s food was available on the open market. However, living standards did improve for Stakhanovite workers, they were rewarded with ?top secret? shops but very few workers were given these luxuries. Noticeably, the consumer economy only benefited a few workers, whilst the majority had suffered resulting in the black market. The five year plan had little success in improving labour productivity. During the first five year plan the majority of Stalin?s industrial labour forces were unskilled peasants who had only recently left the countryside. Similarly, much of what was achieved during the plan was achieved by the slave labour of workers in the gulag. Consequently, workers did not produce high quality goods and they had unrealistic targets to meet. However, during the second five year plan incentives were introduced in order to increase labour productivity. ...read more.

Conclusion

The third year plan initiated a number of important innovations in Soviet military technology. For example in 1939 Gosplan ordered the construction of nine new aircraft factories. Additionally, the central committee had decreed that all of the countries resources should be mobilized in preparation of war. However, much of which was produced was of such low quality that it was practically useless. Notably, the war economy did improve partially due to increase in defence spending, but it did come at the expense of consumer goods. In conclusion, Stalin?s plans did succeed in improving the economy to some extent. Heavy industry grew largely and aided the economy to grow by 14% per year. On the other hand, consumer goods were failing to improve. In order to increase spending on defence, Stalin further cut spending on consumer goods which led to the uncontrollable black market. Even though the Soviet industry was able to produce large amounts of military equipment, it was of such low quality due to the lack of motivation in labour productivity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years ...

    4 star(s)

    Stalin used him into the limelight as an inspirational man and someone who showed what communism was all about. However, the targets Stalin had set were not, in reality, met. Even though the production did increase it was not by the dramatic rates Stalin and the communists had wanted it to and this made the plans seem like failures.

  2. Discuss The African Slave Trade and its influences on the continent. What was ...

    (McNeil, 2004). The consequences of the slave trade were very diverse and varied widely throughout the African continent. It resulted in an exponential increase in warfare and ultimately contributed to the underdevelopment of a rich culture. Upon arriving in Africa, the Europeans found a continent that was divided into a

  1. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    Even after all that Stalin was responsible for, some Russian people today look back on his days in power with something approaching nostalgia. I believe that these people would have been the children of the workers on sites such as Magnitogorsk.

  2. Joseph Stalin's Economic Plans. Stalin ended Lenin's NEP and set about achieving modernisation ...

    The production of tractors and other farm machinery increased. The third Five-Year Plan, which was begun in 1938, some factories were to switch to the production of consumer goods. However, this plan was disrupted by the Second World War. There is much that could be criticized in the Five-Year Plans.

  1. How far did the policy of industrialisation meet Stalins objectives by 1941?

    ?the implementation of the? ?5year plans marked the end of the NEP which destroyed capitalism and everything under state control and management in the USSR. Source C does not directly express motives but implies the rapid pace of development which supports the motive in source A of rapid industrialisation.

  2. How far did the policy of industrialisation meet Stalin's objectives by 1941

    opposed Stalin's Bolshevik Party, again Stalin feared this would be carried out onto a larger international scale and the USSR had to be prepared. Stalin also wanted to make the USSR a self sufficient and strong nation; previously the USSR had been agrarian country dependent on capitalist countries.

  1. How far do you agree that the collectivisation of agriculture made an essential contribution ...

    were often at the front of demonstrations and the picture of women lying down in front of the tractors was not an uncommon site. The widespread resistance became perceived by Stalin and the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU)

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    For example, the left?s approach to industrialisation. 2. Would be too simplistic to say that Stalin was just out for power because he changed his views. 3. Stalin did not just have the advantages of control of the party and the ability to outmanoeuvre them, but also he had popular support.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work