• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Stalins Five-Year Plans (1929-1941) improved the Russian economy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that Stalin?s Five-Year Plans (1929-1941) improved the Russian economy? Stalin?s five year plans did improve the Russian economy due to heavy industry increased the production of steel, iron, oil and coal. However, the five year plan was unsuccessful in terms of consumer goods and labour productivity. Additionally, the plans did not fully succeed in fulfilling Stalin?s targets for war preparation. Heavy industry was successful in improving the economy primarily due to the first three five year plans. Evidently, Industries like coal steel and iron grew enormously. For instance Coal production in 1928 prior to the five year plan was 36million tonnes, and in 1932 it was 65 million tonnes. Furthermore, Magnitogorsk which was constructed during the first five year plan aided the trebling of steel production during the second year plan. ...read more.

Middle

Additionally, even though in the early 1934 bread rationing ended, in comparison to the 1920?s food was available on the open market. However, living standards did improve for Stakhanovite workers, they were rewarded with ?top secret? shops but very few workers were given these luxuries. Noticeably, the consumer economy only benefited a few workers, whilst the majority had suffered resulting in the black market. The five year plan had little success in improving labour productivity. During the first five year plan the majority of Stalin?s industrial labour forces were unskilled peasants who had only recently left the countryside. Similarly, much of what was achieved during the plan was achieved by the slave labour of workers in the gulag. Consequently, workers did not produce high quality goods and they had unrealistic targets to meet. However, during the second five year plan incentives were introduced in order to increase labour productivity. ...read more.

Conclusion

The third year plan initiated a number of important innovations in Soviet military technology. For example in 1939 Gosplan ordered the construction of nine new aircraft factories. Additionally, the central committee had decreed that all of the countries resources should be mobilized in preparation of war. However, much of which was produced was of such low quality that it was practically useless. Notably, the war economy did improve partially due to increase in defence spending, but it did come at the expense of consumer goods. In conclusion, Stalin?s plans did succeed in improving the economy to some extent. Heavy industry grew largely and aided the economy to grow by 14% per year. On the other hand, consumer goods were failing to improve. In order to increase spending on defence, Stalin further cut spending on consumer goods which led to the uncontrollable black market. Even though the Soviet industry was able to produce large amounts of military equipment, it was of such low quality due to the lack of motivation in labour productivity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years ...

    4 star(s)

    Stalin used him into the limelight as an inspirational man and someone who showed what communism was all about. However, the targets Stalin had set were not, in reality, met. Even though the production did increase it was not by the dramatic rates Stalin and the communists had wanted it to and this made the plans seem like failures.

  2. What were the effects of the First Five Year Plan on Russia?

    In the long term this was a good idea because it meant that the people who lived further away from food supplies would have food. It also meant that the government could control the amount of food being produced. The reason it did not work is because the peasants were

  1. How far did the achievements of Stalin's economic modernisation programme justify the costs?

    different factories and lodgings until they found the best of a bad bunch or whatever was left. "In the coal industry in 1930, the average worker moved jobs three times in a year".21 This is supported by Oxley who states that average real pay in 1932 was only half of

  2. "Stalin transformed the Soviet Union from a backward country into a strong modern state ...

    could justify the extent to which the Russian population was decimated in the famines created by collectivisation is debateable. Although highly dubious before the war, Stalin's policy of building up enough weaponry to protect Russia paid off and was undoubtedly one of the major successes of his policies.

  1. How far do you agree Communist ideology influenced Stalin's decision to implement Collectivisation in ...

    Both of these views contest Communist ideology had an influence on the decision to Collectivise. Conquest based the 'influence' on consolidation of power, and Fitzpatrick focused on the pragmatism caused by poor understanding of the original Communist concept of De-kulakisation.

  2. Discuss The African Slave Trade and its influences on the continent. What was ...

    What were the economic, political and social consequences of the transatlantic slave trade? Economic Since the population had depleted in such a huge manner, the economic development of the African continent was hindered. African society was largely based on agriculture the farming of land and the raising of livestock.

  1. How far do you agree that the collectivisation of agriculture made an essential contribution ...

    In this way, it was argued, they would be in a position to afford the latest machinery. Stalin believed this policy would lead to increased production. However, the peasants greatly preferred farming their 'own' land and were reluctant to form themselves into state collectives.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The four years following Lenin?s death resulted in considerable shifts in alliances between leading Communists. 1. Following Trotsky?s attack on the Party?s bureaucracy in 1924, Stalin, Zinoviev and Kamenev allied against him. 2. Trotsky argued to permanent revolution: focusing on encouraging and helping communist revolutions abroad so that the USSR would not be an isolated state.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work