• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that Stalins Five-Year Plans (1929-1941) improved the Russian economy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that Stalin?s Five-Year Plans (1929-1941) improved the Russian economy? Stalin?s five year plans did improve the Russian economy due to heavy industry increased the production of steel, iron, oil and coal. However, the five year plan was unsuccessful in terms of consumer goods and labour productivity. Additionally, the plans did not fully succeed in fulfilling Stalin?s targets for war preparation. Heavy industry was successful in improving the economy primarily due to the first three five year plans. Evidently, Industries like coal steel and iron grew enormously. For instance Coal production in 1928 prior to the five year plan was 36million tonnes, and in 1932 it was 65 million tonnes. Furthermore, Magnitogorsk which was constructed during the first five year plan aided the trebling of steel production during the second year plan. ...read more.

Middle

Additionally, even though in the early 1934 bread rationing ended, in comparison to the 1920?s food was available on the open market. However, living standards did improve for Stakhanovite workers, they were rewarded with ?top secret? shops but very few workers were given these luxuries. Noticeably, the consumer economy only benefited a few workers, whilst the majority had suffered resulting in the black market. The five year plan had little success in improving labour productivity. During the first five year plan the majority of Stalin?s industrial labour forces were unskilled peasants who had only recently left the countryside. Similarly, much of what was achieved during the plan was achieved by the slave labour of workers in the gulag. Consequently, workers did not produce high quality goods and they had unrealistic targets to meet. However, during the second five year plan incentives were introduced in order to increase labour productivity. ...read more.

Conclusion

The third year plan initiated a number of important innovations in Soviet military technology. For example in 1939 Gosplan ordered the construction of nine new aircraft factories. Additionally, the central committee had decreed that all of the countries resources should be mobilized in preparation of war. However, much of which was produced was of such low quality that it was practically useless. Notably, the war economy did improve partially due to increase in defence spending, but it did come at the expense of consumer goods. In conclusion, Stalin?s plans did succeed in improving the economy to some extent. Heavy industry grew largely and aided the economy to grow by 14% per year. On the other hand, consumer goods were failing to improve. In order to increase spending on defence, Stalin further cut spending on consumer goods which led to the uncontrollable black market. Even though the Soviet industry was able to produce large amounts of military equipment, it was of such low quality due to the lack of motivation in labour productivity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful were the Five- Year Plans in transforming Russian industry in the years ...

    4 star(s)

    Stalin used him into the limelight as an inspirational man and someone who showed what communism was all about. However, the targets Stalin had set were not, in reality, met. Even though the production did increase it was not by the dramatic rates Stalin and the communists had wanted it to and this made the plans seem like failures.

  2. Discuss The African Slave Trade and its influences on the continent. What was ...

    Superstitious beliefs and customs arose from the rising number of uncertainties they faced, many anxious for their lives and the future. Social The slave trade had a massive demographical impact on Africa, the enslavement and removal of millions of Africans had detrimental effects on population stability and population growth.

  1. Joseph Stalin's Economic Plans. Stalin ended Lenin's NEP and set about achieving modernisation ...

    Certainly there was a great deal of inefficiency, duplication of effort and waste, although the evidence shows that the Soviets did learn from their mistakes in the second and third Five-Year Plans. There was also an enormous human cost. But the fact remains that by 1937 the USSR was a

  2. What were the effects of the First Five Year Plan on Russia?

    the government took a certain amount of the crops as payment in tax. This left the farmers with very little and morale dropped because the more they made the more would be taken away but if they farmed less then they would be left with no food and would starve.

  1. How far did the policy of industrialisation meet Stalins objectives by 1941?

    ?the implementation of the? ?5year plans marked the end of the NEP which destroyed capitalism and everything under state control and management in the USSR. Source C does not directly express motives but implies the rapid pace of development which supports the motive in source A of rapid industrialisation.

  2. How far did the policy of industrialisation meet Stalin's objectives by 1941

    opposed Stalin's Bolshevik Party, again Stalin feared this would be carried out onto a larger international scale and the USSR had to be prepared. Stalin also wanted to make the USSR a self sufficient and strong nation; previously the USSR had been agrarian country dependent on capitalist countries.

  1. How far do you agree that the collectivisation of agriculture made an essential contribution ...

    Despite huge political pressure, there was stubborn resistance to collectivisation. By December 1929 and March 1930, nearly half the peasant farms in the USSR had been collectivised. But millions of peasants nevertheless resisted.

  2. The Impact of Stalins Leadership in the USSR, 1924 1941. Extensive notes

    The leaders of the Left Opposition were expelled from their positions and from the Politburo. Trotsky was sent into exile, while Kamenev and Zinoviev stayed in the party, but were effectively silenced. How? Stalin used his power-base in the party and the support of the right, led by Bukharin, Rykov and Tomsky to defeat the left.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work