• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the Bolsheviks won the Civil War of 1918-1921 because they controlled more people and had access to more weapons?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that the Bolsheviks won the Civil War of 1918-1921 because they controlled more people and had access to more weapons? Despite the diverse forces massed against the red army, the experience of the white leaders and the precarious position of Lenin, the communists still managed to gain victory in the Civil War of 1918-1921. The two reasons that led to their success were because they had control over more people and because they had access to more weapons (objective factors). However, to what extent is this true, given that there were other contributing factors leading to the Bolshevik victory? The Bolshevik control over heavily populated parts of Russia lead to communist success in the Civil War. The Bolsheviks had a great strategic advantage due to their geographical position in that they had control over major cities such as Moscow and Petrograd which had many people within them. Due to this they controlled major factors and therefore could inherit vast quantities of war materials and munitions. The industry was also very efficient due to the huge mass population in which the majority supported the Bolsheviks. ...read more.

Middle

However, the Bolshevik's control over more people and their access to more weapons were not the only factors as to why they won the Civil war. Another major contributing factor was the failure of the Whites to mobilise and sustain mass support. Although the Bolsheviks had mass opposition, the Whites didn't use this to their advantage especially within the peasantry. Instead, they went to the other extreme whereby they tried to take away their rights and used brutality against them. As a result no support was given to the White army from the peasants - something they needed to get over the military strength of the communists. The whites also didn't gain any support from the different nationalities that were within the Russian empire wanting independence. The Whites could have gained support by granting them independence; however they didn't have any intention in doing this at all. So, although it didn't stop the nationalities from fighting the Bolsheviks, it did prevent them from being one united force against the Communists and resulted in different forces fighting with different loyalties. Therefore, a major that lead to Bolshevik victory was Whites inability to gain mass support and not so much Bolshevik control over more people and access to more weapons. ...read more.

Conclusion

Trotsky also used propaganda throughout his leadership in which he kept pointing out that the reds were defenders of the revolution in 1917 through political speeches. This was successful as the 1917 revolution was supported and encouraged by the majority of the Russian population. Trotsky as a result gained more support which kept the momentum going within the Red army. Due to this, it was great leadership from Leon Trotsky and devotion of the Bolsheviks that determined their victory. Therefore, the Bolshevik's control over more people and access over more weapons were only minor reasons as to why the communists saw victory at the end of the civil war. Although the Bolshevik's control over more people and access to more were factors that did contribute to communist victory, there are other factors that overshadow these. For example, the disunity and general mistakes within the White army contributed greatly towards Bolshevik success. However, the most important factor was the leadership of the red army mainly from Leon Trotsky. Without Trotsky, the army would be less devoted and enthusiastic. He made good use of propaganda to gain more support and terror that got the troops in order through the policies like 'war communism' and the use of 'Commissars'. It was Trotsky that enabled the red army to crush the White army and grant communist victory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Lenin and the Bolshevik revolution.

    Alexandra Kollontai had joined the party during the war precisely because of its defeatist stand, and was the only highly-placed enthusiastic early supporter of the April Theses. Had there been no theses or no Lenin, she almost certainly would have abandoned the Bolsheviks, as she did temporarily a year later

  2. Vietnam war

    essentially uncontested control of Cambodia. The Vietnamese communists agreed to pull their forces out of Cambodia without obtaining in return any power-sharing role, or real protection from government repression, for their Cambodian comrades. Sihanouk adopted a neutralist stance toward his neighbours, accepting aid from America and China, exchanging diplomatic missions

  1. After the second Revolution of October/November 1917, the Civil War took place (1918)-1921). Explain ...

    The civil war when the Czech Legion seized control of a large section of the Trans-Siberian Railway. Bolsheviks stronghold was mainly in the west and much of that had been taken over by Germany as part of the Brest-Litovsk Treaty.

  2. The Bolsheviks won the civil war due to the mistakes of their opponents How ...

    This left the white's very disorganised and unprepared which meant that they weren't ready to attempt to overthrow the Bolshevik's. the white leaders were also often drunk. This meant that they were setting a bad example to their troops. This also gave the Bolshevik's an advantage over their rivals as this made it easier for them to defeat the whites.

  1. To What Extent did Commandos contribute to final victory in World War Two

    "The limited number of Commando units ... never more than the equivalent of 20 infantry battalions at any time - can hardly be said to have impaired the officer corps in the Allied armies of several millions"13 The first Commando raids were however, complete shambles.

  2. Lenins leadership was the main reason for the success of the Bolshevik Revolution in ...

    The Kornilov revolt was arguably detriment to Bolshevik success. Kerensky had made an attempt to gain control over the army and appointed Kornilov as Commander in Chief to reassert discipline into the army. However, Kornilov was a right-wing officer who had never accepted the February Revolution.

  1. How far do you agree that Bolsheviks were able to survive because they controlled ...

    People?s work was organised to suit the war?s needs. In the cities the major industrial enterprises were brought under central government control and the production was shifted to weapons and war equipment.The large Red Army needed large amounts of food hence the Bolsheviks introduced grain requisitioning forcing all the peasant

  2. How far do you agree that the Communists won the Civil War because of ...

    Another important factor in the Whites defeat was a lack of co-operation. The Whites did lack co-operation and commitment. Their mutual belief and their differing goals caused this. The White forces did not co-operate in their military planning, a reason for a lack of co-operation was the geographical position they held throughout within Russia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work