• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the building of castles was the main reason why the English were unable to mount a successful challenge to William's rule?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that the building of castles was the main reason why the English were unable to mount a successful challenge to William's rule? I agree to a certain extent that the 'building of castles' was the main reason the English were unable to mount a successful challenge against William's rule. Other factors which somewhat contributed as well would be: the lack of effective English leadership, uncoordinated rebellions and the 'Harrying of the North'. One way in which the Normans took control over an area to prevent the spread of rebellions was by building castles and fortifications. There is evidence of around 500 motte and bailey castles built during William's reign to symbolise the Norman strength and wealth. To invade a fortified castle to regain control over land was a very hard task for the English locals. Compared to other techniques of keeping the English under control- castles appeared as political statements (geopolitical, much like the church), they always reminded the English locals of who was in charge and allowed the Normans to have many holdouts in an event of an uprising. ...read more.

Middle

Edgar Atheling was expelled from the Scottish court in 1072 by King Malcolm. One by one, leaders of rebellions across England were giving up or being taken down to respect William's reign. Without leaders: rebellions were hard to create and easy to destroy. The widespread destruction in Northumbria became known as the Harrying of the North. As William rapidly marched North in 1069, responding to a recent revolt, he devastated the countryside by burning crops, looting villages, chopping the limbs off all adult males as well as slaughtering the children (so that they may not have revenge when they grow older) - this was a clear representation of his brutality but it was nothing compared to the devastated state William left York in: corpses rotting on the roads, famine and disease spreading, this certainly set an example towards the English locals: considering the fact that the land in Yorkshire was left deserted with farms empty for over 15 years! ...read more.

Conclusion

However, the areas around the new castles became peaceful, since many of the risings arose from local grievances, rather than dissatisfaction with William's rule, each castle provided work for the local Saxons and kept the areas, in which they were built in, stable. If a revolt were to rise; William's men would have been able to move swiftly to put down trouble before it had a chance to develop whereas it could have taken days to march to an uprising (which would have risen in numbers by then). Castles were an effective method of keeping the English under control, they could last for years (some even to this day); which may have been why William had built hundreds of them around England during his reign from 1066 to 1087. Resources * Medieval England 1042-10228 - Toby Purser * William the Conqueror- David Bates * The English and the Norman conquest- Ann Williams * Ruling England, 1042-1217- Richard Huscroft * http://www.btinternet.com/~mrfield/Conquest/resistance/resistance_to_william.htm ?? ?? ?? ?? Rohan Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a well structured and considerate response that shows real understanding of the functions of castles but also considers alternative explanations. Norman military superiority in other areas could also be considered. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 20/08/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Labour weakness was the most important reason for Conservative dominance from 1951 to 1964. ...

    5 star(s)

    Labour provided ineffectual opposition during this time, mainly because of major divides in their party. Senior members often couldn't agree on who the "true character" of the party was and what they really stood for, meaning they wouldn't really be able to create an effective manifesto that held the same values the entire way through it.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How serious a threat did the Puritans pose to Elizabeth I and her Church?

    4 star(s)

    Neale claims that Peter Wentworth's demand for freedom of speech made him the heroic figurehead of Parliaments struggle, however due to the fact that nobody took him seriously and no change resulted from his demands, it seems as if Michael Graves' interpretation is more accurate.

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    Charles abandoned England as an ally, and so in 1525, Wolsey began to negotiate with France. This resulted in the Treaty of the More; which Francis' mother, the Regent of France, signed whilst her son was held captive under Charles.

  2. What problems did Elizabeth I face at the begining of her reign?

    However, this could lead to the French using their base in Scotland to overthrow Elizabeth as the ruler of Scotland at the time was Mary Queen of Scots mother, a French Princess. Foreign policy was a difficult problem to solve because she needed to ensure peace in a way that

  1. What Caused The English Civil War ?

    This made Parliament strongly believe that they should have more say in running the country. Charles firmly believed in the 'Divine Rights of Kings', and that it was his right to rule his country. Charles appeared to favour Catholicism and many feared that Charles was bringing up his children as Roman Catholics.

  2. Why did King Charles I Resort to Personal Rule in 1629?

    He was notorious for purging the court of his enemies (Buckingham's dominance of court titles forced such people as Thomas Wentworth to look to the Commons not court to pursue their interests). A lot of the examples of the King abusing his power were thanks to Buckingham's influence over Charles, e.g.

  1. Economic and social issues were the main cause of Tudor Rebellion in Tudor England. ...

    On the other hand, these rebellions were different. The Pilgrimage was a national revolt while Western and Northern Earls were regional revolts. The Pilgrimage and Western?s main cause for rebellion was mainly because of the changes in religion while Northern Earls simply used religion to gain support. Kett and Wyatt also made use of religion in different ways.

  2. Why did Pitt dominate politics 1783-93?

    supporters in contest with the opposition who only got 213, this meant that political stability existed once more in British politics, and Pitt could now tackle Britain?s other problems and create new policies to improve Britain. Pitt?s policies were a major part of gaining domination, he successfully increased support for

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work