• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the building of castles was the main reason why the English were unable to mount a successful challenge to William's rule?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that the building of castles was the main reason why the English were unable to mount a successful challenge to William's rule? I agree to a certain extent that the 'building of castles' was the main reason the English were unable to mount a successful challenge against William's rule. Other factors which somewhat contributed as well would be: the lack of effective English leadership, uncoordinated rebellions and the 'Harrying of the North'. One way in which the Normans took control over an area to prevent the spread of rebellions was by building castles and fortifications. There is evidence of around 500 motte and bailey castles built during William's reign to symbolise the Norman strength and wealth. To invade a fortified castle to regain control over land was a very hard task for the English locals. Compared to other techniques of keeping the English under control- castles appeared as political statements (geopolitical, much like the church), they always reminded the English locals of who was in charge and allowed the Normans to have many holdouts in an event of an uprising. ...read more.

Middle

Edgar Atheling was expelled from the Scottish court in 1072 by King Malcolm. One by one, leaders of rebellions across England were giving up or being taken down to respect William's reign. Without leaders: rebellions were hard to create and easy to destroy. The widespread destruction in Northumbria became known as the Harrying of the North. As William rapidly marched North in 1069, responding to a recent revolt, he devastated the countryside by burning crops, looting villages, chopping the limbs off all adult males as well as slaughtering the children (so that they may not have revenge when they grow older) - this was a clear representation of his brutality but it was nothing compared to the devastated state William left York in: corpses rotting on the roads, famine and disease spreading, this certainly set an example towards the English locals: considering the fact that the land in Yorkshire was left deserted with farms empty for over 15 years! ...read more.

Conclusion

However, the areas around the new castles became peaceful, since many of the risings arose from local grievances, rather than dissatisfaction with William's rule, each castle provided work for the local Saxons and kept the areas, in which they were built in, stable. If a revolt were to rise; William's men would have been able to move swiftly to put down trouble before it had a chance to develop whereas it could have taken days to march to an uprising (which would have risen in numbers by then). Castles were an effective method of keeping the English under control, they could last for years (some even to this day); which may have been why William had built hundreds of them around England during his reign from 1066 to 1087. Resources * Medieval England 1042-10228 - Toby Purser * William the Conqueror- David Bates * The English and the Norman conquest- Ann Williams * Ruling England, 1042-1217- Richard Huscroft * http://www.btinternet.com/~mrfield/Conquest/resistance/resistance_to_william.htm ?? ?? ?? ?? Rohan Smith ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a well structured and considerate response that shows real understanding of the functions of castles but also considers alternative explanations. Norman military superiority in other areas could also be considered. 4 out of 5 stars.

Marked by teacher Natalya Luck 20/08/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was English foreign policy in the years 1509 1529?

    4 star(s)

    Henry divorcing his aunt - if only to infuriate Henry, and not out of any affection for her. In January 1528, Henry found himself in the situation where he was virtually at war with Charles V. It was never intended to be a proper full scale war, but was declared

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How successful was Wolsey in his Domestic Administration 1515-29?

    4 star(s)

    Instead he produced the 'amicable grant' trying to appeal to the patriotic and generous side of people. But when he wanted more money on top of what they were already paying the taxpayers resisted and a rebellion began. Much of it centred around the wool town of Lavenham, were it was Bedlam as they refused to pay any more money.

  1. What problems did Elizabeth I face at the begining of her reign?

    However, this could lead to the French using their base in Scotland to overthrow Elizabeth as the ruler of Scotland at the time was Mary Queen of Scots mother, a French Princess. Foreign policy was a difficult problem to solve because she needed to ensure peace in a way that

  2. What Caused The English Civil War ?

    This made Parliament strongly believe that they should have more say in running the country. Charles firmly believed in the 'Divine Rights of Kings', and that it was his right to rule his country. Charles appeared to favour Catholicism and many feared that Charles was bringing up his children as Roman Catholics.

  1. How successfully did James deal with religious problems throughout his reign?

    In 1618, James' foreign policy interfered with the religious struggle in England. In order to create safety and allegiance for the future, James tried to marry Charles off to the Spanish Infanta. In pursuing this goal his policy towards Catholics at home softened.

  2. Religion was the most serious problem facing Elizabeth in 1558? How far do you ...

    This may have saved Elizabeth a lot of money in the long term and therefore thanks to this solution makes this problem less serious. Additionally Elizabeth?s gender was a huge issue. Quite simply in Tudor England the common thought was that women should follow their husband.

  1. How well did Pitt deal with the radical threat?

    Also, as mentioned before, his inability to close down the Corresponding Societies only resulted in the numbers of radicals thriving, and so this too can be counted as a slight flaw in Pitt?s changes. Also, possibly one of the most arguable things is that one could say that the extreme

  2. Economic and social issues were the main cause of Tudor Rebellion in Tudor England. ...

    The Northern Earls also used religion to attract support from the peasantry as this concerned them. Northumberland confessed to their supporters that their main aim was religion however it seemed that it was more personal. On the other hand, these rebellions were different.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work