• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the Communists won the Civil War because of the weaknesses of their opponents?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How far do you agree that the Communists won the Civil War because of the weaknesses of their opponents? The biggest challenge to Bolshevik rule was the Civil War (1918-1921). Bolshevik victory ensured the extension in power of the world?s first Communist state. There were a wide variety of factors behind the Bolshevik victory and clearly one of these was largely due to the failure of their opponents. Whites had certain weaknesses, they failed in their attempt to gain power due to a number of core reasons including the arrangement of the white forces, various ideologies and insufficient commitment to the cause. However it must be said that the numerous weaknesses within the Whites went in to help the Bolsheviks win the Civil War. Therefore I believe to a certain extent as it?s important to recognize the strengths of the Bolsheviks and the role that the Red army played must not be underestimated. A major weakness of the White forces was their lack of unity. For a start, they were politically divided containing Socialists, Moderates and Liberals whose political differences often led them into cruel disputes among themselves. ...read more.


Unlike their opponents , they had access to transport and communication networks. They were able to use these to ensure troops and suppliers reached their destinations. They could communicate more effectively because their territory was continuous, allowing them to coordinate attacks against their enemies. They could produce more munitions than the White armies, who had to rely on foreign support. Furthermore, foreign intervention in the civil war ultimately came to little. In theory the involvement of other major powers should have caused disaster and defeat for the Bolsheviks. At one point the Reds were fighting the forces of fourteen different foreign countries in addition to the Whites within Russia. However, the foreign powers were also disunited in their reason for involvement. The foreign powers seem ultimately uncommitted to their role in the Civil War, They were too exhausted and were concerned with the defeat of Germany and by 1919 they had left Russian land. On the other hand, despite the fact that the weakness of their opponents was central to explaining the success of the bolsheviks in the Civil War. However, they were not the only reason in explaining bolshevik success, they won the Russian Civil War due to their own strengths aswell. ...read more.


However, Lenin was sensible enough to see the need for change when problems arose. Following the peasant uprising and naval revolt, Lenin abandoned War Communism and replaced it with the New Economic Policy to ensure that the Bolsheviks would stay in power in the latter stages of Civil War. To conclude, there is much evidence to suggest that the view put forward in the essay is a valid one. The bolsheviks faced a divided and poorly organized enemy in the form of the Whites. Generals Deniken, Yudenich and Admiral Kolchak failed to coordinate their military forces, allowing the Bolsheviks to confront them individually. The Whites had a number of weaknesses, the most significant being their basic lack of unity, organisation and poor geographical position throughout the Civil War. While, Anti-Bolshevik forces contained those who wished to see the return of a Tsarist style regime to Liberals, Socialists and Social revolutionaries such disunity was an important factor in explaining Lenin?s success. However, we must be careful not to dismiss the strengths of the Bolsheviks entirely, particularly the assets and achievements of Trotsky. Therefore, while the success of the Bolsheviks would seem to have more to do with the weaknesses of their opponents, the Red?s did possess certain key strengths which are partly responsible for their success in the Civil War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    * Napoleon only narrowly averted disaster. At Essling, he was outnumbered and forced to retreat onto an island in the Danube. He lost 20,000 men in a bloody exchange which again sapped French prestige. * By July, with preparations complete, Napoleon met the Austrians again - this time at Wagram.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * This was followed by the widespread denunciation and humiliation of those who had supposedly strayed from the conformity of 'socialist realism'. * Those who were expelled from Writers and Composers Unions included some of the great names of Soviet arts.

  1. "Hitler's foreign policy successes between 1936 and 1939 rested on his remarkable tactical skills ...

    He threatened President Miklas with German invasion unless Schuschnigg was allowed to resign (which, under pressure, he did), and also dictated a telegram from Seyss-Inquart, inviting the German army to enter Austria to "preserve law and order". Consequently, German troops entered Austria on 12th March 1938.

  2. Vietnam war

    cover for an entire regiment, storage, safety from air attack, and regrouping facilities. * Vietcong worked under cadres in close-knit cell groups of three, dedicated to the ideals of unification and nationalism. The North Vietnamese Army (NVA) * By 1975 the NVA's technology was superior to that suppled by the

  1. After the second Revolution of October/November 1917, the Civil War took place (1918)-1921). Explain ...

    They were sent by their governments to force Russia back into war against Germany. The British attacked from north towards Petrograd alongside the French and Americans. The French and British attack from the south and west through Crimea and towards the Bolshevik's stronghold.

  2. To what extent did the Bolsheviks use terror tacticts in the years 1918-1921 only ...

    Finally, the third view that is held on the issue of Bolshevik terror used during the civil war is of the Revisionists. Revisionist historians take into account sources and information from the time of the civil war and also of more recent documents and try to weigh up both against each other to create a more balanced argument.

  1. Did Fascism come to power more through its own strengths or through the weakness ...

    The attitude of the government throughout this period was vital to the success of fascism in Italy, as it show to the Italian people that the government wasn't strong or organised enough to deal with the problems of socialism. This lead to a growing number of disillusioned Italians supporting Mussolini and his fascist squads.

  2. How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of the Tsarist ...

    When Alexander III came into power he turned around many of his father?s liberal reforms. With the University Statute of 1887 he limited the powers of the universities to manage their own affairs, and with this replaced many liberal professors with more conservative ones.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work