• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the Communists won the Civil War because of the weaknesses of their opponents?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐How far do you agree that the Communists won the Civil War because of the weaknesses of their opponents? The biggest challenge to Bolshevik rule was the Civil War (1918-1921). Bolshevik victory ensured the extension in power of the world?s first Communist state. There were a wide variety of factors behind the Bolshevik victory and clearly one of these was largely due to the failure of their opponents. Whites had certain weaknesses, they failed in their attempt to gain power due to a number of core reasons including the arrangement of the white forces, various ideologies and insufficient commitment to the cause. However it must be said that the numerous weaknesses within the Whites went in to help the Bolsheviks win the Civil War. Therefore I believe to a certain extent as it?s important to recognize the strengths of the Bolsheviks and the role that the Red army played must not be underestimated. A major weakness of the White forces was their lack of unity. For a start, they were politically divided containing Socialists, Moderates and Liberals whose political differences often led them into cruel disputes among themselves. ...read more.


Unlike their opponents , they had access to transport and communication networks. They were able to use these to ensure troops and suppliers reached their destinations. They could communicate more effectively because their territory was continuous, allowing them to coordinate attacks against their enemies. They could produce more munitions than the White armies, who had to rely on foreign support. Furthermore, foreign intervention in the civil war ultimately came to little. In theory the involvement of other major powers should have caused disaster and defeat for the Bolsheviks. At one point the Reds were fighting the forces of fourteen different foreign countries in addition to the Whites within Russia. However, the foreign powers were also disunited in their reason for involvement. The foreign powers seem ultimately uncommitted to their role in the Civil War, They were too exhausted and were concerned with the defeat of Germany and by 1919 they had left Russian land. On the other hand, despite the fact that the weakness of their opponents was central to explaining the success of the bolsheviks in the Civil War. However, they were not the only reason in explaining bolshevik success, they won the Russian Civil War due to their own strengths aswell. ...read more.


However, Lenin was sensible enough to see the need for change when problems arose. Following the peasant uprising and naval revolt, Lenin abandoned War Communism and replaced it with the New Economic Policy to ensure that the Bolsheviks would stay in power in the latter stages of Civil War. To conclude, there is much evidence to suggest that the view put forward in the essay is a valid one. The bolsheviks faced a divided and poorly organized enemy in the form of the Whites. Generals Deniken, Yudenich and Admiral Kolchak failed to coordinate their military forces, allowing the Bolsheviks to confront them individually. The Whites had a number of weaknesses, the most significant being their basic lack of unity, organisation and poor geographical position throughout the Civil War. While, Anti-Bolshevik forces contained those who wished to see the return of a Tsarist style regime to Liberals, Socialists and Social revolutionaries such disunity was an important factor in explaining Lenin?s success. However, we must be careful not to dismiss the strengths of the Bolsheviks entirely, particularly the assets and achievements of Trotsky. Therefore, while the success of the Bolsheviks would seem to have more to do with the weaknesses of their opponents, the Red?s did possess certain key strengths which are partly responsible for their success in the Civil War. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Reasons for Napoleon's Success (to 1807).

    Napoleon was victorious in the epic, two-day clash of artillery. Casualties on both sides were enormous. Napoleon lost at least 32,000 men, while the Austrians retreated with 80,000 survivors. * Peace was dictated to Austria at Schonbrunn. It was Napoleon's last great victory. The signs of French problems were disturbing.

  2. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    * The post war years saw a re-establishment of the repressive Stalinist regime and the planned economy. There is no doubt to the devastating effect of the war on industry as a whole, not least the loss of 20 million lives.

  1. Why Did the Bolsheviks Win the Russian Civil War?

    You would have to work hard to get rations. A class based system of rationing was introduced - the Red army and workforce were given priority, and the middle classes were discriminated against and got barely enough to live on. Also the whites alienated themselves from different groups and minorities.

  2. How far do the sources support the view that the Bolsheviks won the Civil ...

    As for 'popular support', according to Serge, Trotsky believed the 'little army' of the Whites had no chance against the 'working class capital of 700,000'. But if he believed they had supporters, why did he have to rally the support of them and others in the city?

  1. Why Did The Bolsheviks Win The Civil War?

    material from France and financing the operation with money from a United States food loan. The Poles took Kiev in May 1920. The Bolsheviks retook Kiev in June and sent the Polish army back in a rout. By mid-August, the Bolsheviks had pushed westward to the outskirts of Warsaw -- causing concern in Britain and France.

  2. The survival of the tsars regime in Russia between 1906 and 1914 was due ...

    He believed in suppression first then reform. Yet reform should only be done to reduce social bitterness. This policy was based on trying to weaken any potential opponents so went some way to ensure the survival of the tsarist regime.

  1. How far was Mussolinis ability to secure and increase his power in the period ...

    relatively untarnished, evidenced by the fact that in the same election Mussolini?s party was able to gain 7% of the vote. Although a relatively small number compared to the others, it remains a key milestone in Mussolini?s rise to power; the PNF had only been formed in the same year

  2. How far were divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of the Tsarist ...

    The finance minister Nicolai Bunge introduced the Peasant?s Land Bank in 1883. This offered affordable loans to peasants for the purchase of land and agricultural equipment. He also abolished the poll tax for all peasants and offered cash incentives for them to move to Siberia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work