• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the Crimean War was the major turning point in creating a changed approach to waging war during the period 1793-1918?

Extracts from this document...


How far do you agree that the Crimean War was the major turning point in creating a changed approach to waging war during the period 1793-1918? The Crimean War of 1854 can be seen as vital in creating a changed approach to warfare during the period 1793-1918 because it occurred in the middle section of the period. It was the first war where it was clearly evident that technological and military changes had been made, as well as changes in public opinion and the reporting of war. The Napoleonic Wars at the beginning of the period began the first stage of changing the way war was waged. These armies commanded by Napoleon himself were vast in number compared to those of armies which were relatively small. A number of military reforms following the French revolution also saw the re-organisation of the army for greater speed of attacks. This in turn set the wheels in motion for further progress in warfare. ...read more.


The development of the rifle with these improvements meant it was faster firing, more reliable and had a longer range, placing an advantage in warfare with the defender who could pick off on-rushing soldiers from the cover of their defensive lines. There were also improvements to artillery as the technological advances seen in the rifle could be transferred across to the artillery. Britain adopted a rifle form of cannon in the Crimea which destroyed Sebastopol with their increased range and accuracy. Therefore it can be said that the Crimean War did play a major part in the changed approach to the way war was waged. However it is most evident that the greatest advance was in the railways. The advances made were highly beneficial to military engagements as they allowed troops to be moved much faster and more reliably. In 1848 the railways were used for exactly this reason and had a highly significant effect. ...read more.


This out of date offensive was used right up until World War I when the technology had advanced even further and a the range of weapons had increased meaning that the distance to the enemy without any cover had widened and any offensive was suicidal. Therefore, one can see that The Crimean War did not completely change the approach to waging war during the period. While these arguments against the effect of The Crimean War are wholly valid it can still be concluded that the Crimean War was a turning point in the changed approach to waging war during the period 1793-1918. The Crimean War brought about a whole new wave of weaponry (the rifle), a highly developed railway system, and a massively improved communication system (the electric telegraph) which ultimately revolutionised the way war was waged from a technological and military perspective. This was clearly shown throughout the period after the war. Therefore even though the tactics of war did not change massively as a result of the Crimea, it can still be considered a major turning point. ?? ?? ?? ?? Robdeep Sangha U6SB ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Free essay

    In what ways can the Second World War (1939-1945) be regarded as the turning ...

    During the Second World War, her economy even proliferated. All types of her industries boosted and her GNP reached an unprecedented level. The invention of the world's first atomic bomb also showed that she became a superpower after the wars.

  2. Why was the Battle of Stalingrad a turning point in the war against ...

    It gave overwhelming confidence and strength to the Red Army. Also, the battle became the turning point on the Eastern Front. The Red Army began to slowly push the invaders out of the Soviet Union. But this fact that Russia became so optimistic could have potentially been very dangerous; Stalin

  1. Vietnam war

    * The conference (April 1954) stipulated national elections take place in two years, but Diem suppressed the advocates of the agreed-to election, and it never took place. The suppression continued, which led South Vietnamese opponents of President Ngo Dinh

  2. How far was the Crimean War a turning point in the development of Modern ...

    The conflict made it evident that Russia's known bureaucracy was instead filled with corruption and was also poorly organised. Thus in 1861 the Emancipation of the Serfs took place, which was the most significant and of most importance of the liberal reforms which was brought under effect during the reign of Tsar Alexander II.

  1. The importance of the First World War as a turning point in the development ...

    This change was not as significant as the First World War's as didn't lead to a change in government and was only a small step towards democracy. When Nicholas II published the fundamental laws in 1906 the majority of the Duma's power was gone and with it any real chance of democracy in Russia at that time.

  2. How far do the sources suggest that the British army leaders were not concerned ...

    Source one because, as it is a newspaper article, it may have been exaggerated for the sympathy from the British public for the soldiers, but also to sell more copies and the reporter may have gone to the most affected area and also in the dead of winter, when soldiers would be down anyway.

  1. How far could the fall of the Tsars be considered the most significant turning ...

    However, since Hill was an English Marxist who joined the Communist Party of Great Britain, he is not an entirely reliable source as his political beliefs would obviously favour the Bolsheviks which suggests that his opinoin on the fall of the Tsars could be rather one sided.

  2. British dominance was unrivalled during the period of 1850-1929. How far do you agree ...

    As a result of this, Britain had to progressively alter its Navy in a modernising form, which clearly affected the economic strength as change did not come cheap. It was perhaps the rapid alterations after slow development that limited Britain, especially with warships now being obsolete on completion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work