• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the Revisionist Views (of the causes of the Korean war) is the most accurate?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Anna Thompson How far do you agree that the Revisionist Views (of the causes of the Korean war) is the most accurate? By 1950 the Korean War threatened to escalate a local war in a major international conflict. Since then there has been a constant debate on the invasion the south had the North. They argue if the invasion was a product of the communist bloc which was newly strengthened by china, and if it was attempting to spread its power. The question, what actually was the real cause of the Korean War is discussed by many historians and their views. These include Traditional, Revisionist, The local/international approaches and the significance of domestic products of Truman's foreign policy. Even though there are many approaches to the causes of the Korean war, The revisionist remains one the most accurate along with the traditional view. Revisionist view of the Korean war is different to those of the traditional and local approaches. ...read more.

Middle

This was mainly because he was worried what was about to happen, he concluded the south Korean regime was determined to launch an attack on the north sooner or later and it was important to forestall this aggression. Therefore the revisionists continued too discuss Stalin's true intentions. The Approach named traditional also has some accuracy to an extent. Instead they argue that the Korean war was for the protection of ideas from democracy against the spread of communism from the north. This links back to the accuracy of the revisionist view as in 1950 they both believe that Stalin was too spread world communism into Korea. However the ignore the harsh undemocratic regime of Synam Rhee in the south. He was hardly a model of freedom and democracy. However they overlooked this because of his communist credentials. America were very keen to become involved with the War. The hadn't always been so keen to intervention of other countries, however chorea was seen as imperative. ...read more.

Conclusion

He has been said to be too soft on communism, and this was seen in the traditional view of communism, as they just brushed over the regime of Synam Rhee. As Truman was blamed for the loss of china and as a result within the US establishment there had become a pressure for firm, direc ation against communism from Hawks in the air force. This was shortly before the start of the Korean War, Therefore he was under tough watch and pressure that he would not capitulate to communist aggression once again. In conclusion the different approaches all look the Korean war from a different perspective. For example the local/international factors say that the war was purely a local war which drew in superpowers. The revisionist show that Stalin played a limited role in the Korean war and was cautious to get involved with America, and the traditional view say it was democracy against te spread of communism from the north. Summarizing they all share some accuracy but the revisionist Approach is by far the most accurate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The causes of the show trials and purges of the 1930’s

    meetings of any Party cell.32 Many of the expelled Party members were described as "kulaks, white-guards, Troskyites, Zinovievites and other dirt,"33 sent to forced labour camps, exiled to Siberia, sent to prison, and shot.34 What many historians refer to as "the terror,"35 began on December 1st 1934 when Stalin received

  2. What were the causes of World War II?

    They eventually tried to solve their problems by territorial expansion. In Germany, runaway inflation destroyed the value of money and wiped out the savings of millions of people. In 1923, the German economy neared collapse. Loans from the United States helped Germany's government restore order.

  1. How accurate is Trotsky's account of the causes of the Kronstadt rebellion?

    most loyal and honourable sailors did not take part in the Kronstadt rebellion. He says that only the uneducated took part in it. He says that the rebellion occurred because the rebels wanted privileges over the rest of the starving country (i.e.

  2. Leni Riefenstahl The Propagandist or Artist? A Historiographical Debate.

    * Triumph of the Will- She admits that Triumph of the Will was commissioned by Hitler but has argued that how could she know then (1934) what horrors would follow. Riefenstahl displayed neither the intention nor the awareness to execute her works as propaganda for the Party.

  1. Vietnam war

    * The public seeing the inadequacies of previous US policy, turned their support towards a leader who could bring them out of Vietnam though not through defeat. President Nixon upon his inauguration in 1969, built upon LBJ's policy of de-escalation and seeking peace, through his Nixon doctrine.

  2. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    Mussolini was in charge of eight different ministries however he didn't personally administer ay of his ministries so did not know what was going on in them. In 1927 only 15% of civil service were fascists, was compulsory to join Fascist party in 1935 but that did not mean they all then practised fascism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work