• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the Revisionist Views (of the causes of the Korean war) is the most accurate?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Anna Thompson How far do you agree that the Revisionist Views (of the causes of the Korean war) is the most accurate? By 1950 the Korean War threatened to escalate a local war in a major international conflict. Since then there has been a constant debate on the invasion the south had the North. They argue if the invasion was a product of the communist bloc which was newly strengthened by china, and if it was attempting to spread its power. The question, what actually was the real cause of the Korean War is discussed by many historians and their views. These include Traditional, Revisionist, The local/international approaches and the significance of domestic products of Truman's foreign policy. Even though there are many approaches to the causes of the Korean war, The revisionist remains one the most accurate along with the traditional view. Revisionist view of the Korean war is different to those of the traditional and local approaches. ...read more.

Middle

This was mainly because he was worried what was about to happen, he concluded the south Korean regime was determined to launch an attack on the north sooner or later and it was important to forestall this aggression. Therefore the revisionists continued too discuss Stalin's true intentions. The Approach named traditional also has some accuracy to an extent. Instead they argue that the Korean war was for the protection of ideas from democracy against the spread of communism from the north. This links back to the accuracy of the revisionist view as in 1950 they both believe that Stalin was too spread world communism into Korea. However the ignore the harsh undemocratic regime of Synam Rhee in the south. He was hardly a model of freedom and democracy. However they overlooked this because of his communist credentials. America were very keen to become involved with the War. The hadn't always been so keen to intervention of other countries, however chorea was seen as imperative. ...read more.

Conclusion

He has been said to be too soft on communism, and this was seen in the traditional view of communism, as they just brushed over the regime of Synam Rhee. As Truman was blamed for the loss of china and as a result within the US establishment there had become a pressure for firm, direc ation against communism from Hawks in the air force. This was shortly before the start of the Korean War, Therefore he was under tough watch and pressure that he would not capitulate to communist aggression once again. In conclusion the different approaches all look the Korean war from a different perspective. For example the local/international factors say that the war was purely a local war which drew in superpowers. The revisionist show that Stalin played a limited role in the Korean war and was cautious to get involved with America, and the traditional view say it was democracy against te spread of communism from the north. Summarizing they all share some accuracy but the revisionist Approach is by far the most accurate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. The causes of the show trials and purges of the 1930’s

    meetings of any Party cell.32 Many of the expelled Party members were described as "kulaks, white-guards, Troskyites, Zinovievites and other dirt,"33 sent to forced labour camps, exiled to Siberia, sent to prison, and shot.34 What many historians refer to as "the terror,"35 began on December 1st 1934 when Stalin received

  2. Vietnam war

    * Were equipped with AK47s rifles and B40 rockets from captured French and US supplies� bettered equipped than the ARVN. * Employed extensive tunnelling systems to counter the effects of America's defoliate campaign from the air. 300 KM Cu Chi tunnel system north of Saigon � provided control offices, hospitals,

  1. How far were long term causes more important than short term causes in the ...

    mistrusted were not major as they caused people to oppose him but did not make the French people revolutionary. A further long term cause which led to the fall of the Bourbons in 1830 was the mishandling of the chamber between 1827 and 1828.

  2. What were the causes of World War II?

    By the late 1920's, Europe appeared to be entering a period of economic stability. A worldwide business slump known as The Great Depression began in the United States in 1929. By the early 1930's, it had halted Europe's economic recovery.

  1. "Mussolini was an all powerful dictator" - How accurate is this statement?

    he still needed control at the bottom in the towns and villages and in local government. To do this he replaced local government elected mayors with appointed officials called podestas, who would have been 'yes' men to him giving him even more control over the people.

  2. How accurate is Trotsky's account of the causes of the Kronstadt rebellion?

    most loyal and honourable sailors did not take part in the Kronstadt rebellion. He says that only the uneducated took part in it. He says that the rebellion occurred because the rebels wanted privileges over the rest of the starving country (i.e.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work