• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the revolutions of 184849 in Italy were caused primarily by economic grievances?

Extracts from this document...


How far do you agree that the revolutions of 1848?49 in Italy were caused primarily by economic grievances? In 1848 revolutions swept across Europe including countries such as France, Prussia, Germany and Italy. Many countries ? with the exception of Britain ? attempted to modernize themselves as they rode the wave of riots, demonstrations and rallies eventually (in many cases) leading to political reform. The causes of these revolutions remain heavily disputed by historians today and it is impossible to identify only one factor as the sole cause for the uprisings. However, a significant player in the onset of such revolutions across Europe and especially in Italy is down to the economic grievances suffered by civilians during this time. The years preceding 1848 were turbulent ones, and whilst it was a key component in inducing the rebellion it worked merely as a trigger ? bringing already brewing feelings across Italy from underneath the surface to the fore. ...read more.


Although I do not think the economic grievances was a primary cause the belief the French Revolution instilled into many of the Italian peasants and civilians who rebelled was indeed heightened by the economic grievances. During the 1840?s, overpopulation in the countryside and poor standards of living led to the widespread migration to urban areas creating a new sense of class consciousness which just wasn?t present in Italian society before. The nature of the peninsula created a clear divide between the North and the South which was eradicated by the mass migration and made clear the growing gap between the poorest in society and richest. The anger at living side by side with their much wealthier counterparts made a portion of Italian society very angry and created a situation whereby riots and demonstrations were almost necessary. ...read more.


direct influence economic factors had on people's lives I do not feel that the cause of the 1848 revolutions can be put down primarily to that. I think the overriding factor is this atmosphere of change brewing in Italy at the time. Many might argue that the economic factor is a contributor to this, but I feel it was the actions of the Pope and the activities taking place all across Europe that are the main causes. If the Pope were not to assume power in 1846 and carry out the 'radical' changes he did instilling a sense of belief into many reformers who finally believed that modernization was not a dream but entirely possible, I do not think the revolutions would have gathered such momentum and involved key areas within Italy. The economic grievances cannot be discredited as a contributing factor however it is not a determining one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did the 1848 revolutions in italy fail?

    Issues were usually localised and there was lack of co-operation between revolutionary groups, for example in Piedmont where Charles Albert would only accept volunteers from other states or groups if they declared their loyalty to him first. This lack of organisation and unity made it easy for leaders such as

  2. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    Hyperinflation in Germany couldn't be tolerates by the locals, as it had adverse effects on their financial lives. As a result of the led down people of Germany Stresemann was introduced into the government as the new Chancellor of Germany from 1923-1929.

  1. Why did the Revolutions of 1848 did not lead to a united Germany?

    The thought of being overthrown was on the mind of every monarch of Europe in February 1848. This cataclysmic event led to many revolutions all over the Bund. The first place to be hit by revolutionary fever was the Rhineland, this region was under Prussian control but because it shared

  2. Why were there two revolutions in Russiain 1917?

    1." This was a clarion call for soldiers' councils to be established in every military unit and for the election of officers by the troops. All of this resulted in catastrophic confusion within the army, since armies in general can hardly function as democratic institutions especially in times of war.

  1. The Revolutions of 1848 were caused by numerous events taking place in Europe. ...

    This prompted the government to pass many socialist programs, including the development of National Workshops. These workshops were state-owned manufacturing organizations in which workers would be guaranteed work. They would soon become crowded with thousands of dissatisfied workers, growing more agitated as time elapses.

  2. Why did the early revolutions fail to unite Italy?

    Thirty Carbonari members advanced on the town of Avellino and a widespread uprising took place. General Guglielmo Pepe led more infantry and two cavalry regiments to join the Carbonari, showing that more than one person thought they were leading the revolution and that there was no clear leader for the people of Piedmont to follow.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work