• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the revolutions of 184849 in Italy were caused primarily by economic grievances?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How far do you agree that the revolutions of 1848?49 in Italy were caused primarily by economic grievances? In 1848 revolutions swept across Europe including countries such as France, Prussia, Germany and Italy. Many countries ? with the exception of Britain ? attempted to modernize themselves as they rode the wave of riots, demonstrations and rallies eventually (in many cases) leading to political reform. The causes of these revolutions remain heavily disputed by historians today and it is impossible to identify only one factor as the sole cause for the uprisings. However, a significant player in the onset of such revolutions across Europe and especially in Italy is down to the economic grievances suffered by civilians during this time. The years preceding 1848 were turbulent ones, and whilst it was a key component in inducing the rebellion it worked merely as a trigger ? bringing already brewing feelings across Italy from underneath the surface to the fore. ...read more.

Middle

Although I do not think the economic grievances was a primary cause the belief the French Revolution instilled into many of the Italian peasants and civilians who rebelled was indeed heightened by the economic grievances. During the 1840?s, overpopulation in the countryside and poor standards of living led to the widespread migration to urban areas creating a new sense of class consciousness which just wasn?t present in Italian society before. The nature of the peninsula created a clear divide between the North and the South which was eradicated by the mass migration and made clear the growing gap between the poorest in society and richest. The anger at living side by side with their much wealthier counterparts made a portion of Italian society very angry and created a situation whereby riots and demonstrations were almost necessary. ...read more.

Conclusion

direct influence economic factors had on people's lives I do not feel that the cause of the 1848 revolutions can be put down primarily to that. I think the overriding factor is this atmosphere of change brewing in Italy at the time. Many might argue that the economic factor is a contributor to this, but I feel it was the actions of the Pope and the activities taking place all across Europe that are the main causes. If the Pope were not to assume power in 1846 and carry out the 'radical' changes he did instilling a sense of belief into many reformers who finally believed that modernization was not a dream but entirely possible, I do not think the revolutions would have gathered such momentum and involved key areas within Italy. The economic grievances cannot be discredited as a contributing factor however it is not a determining one. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Why did the 1848 revolutions in italy fail?

    Issues were usually localised and there was lack of co-operation between revolutionary groups, for example in Piedmont where Charles Albert would only accept volunteers from other states or groups if they declared their loyalty to him first. This lack of organisation and unity made it easy for leaders such as

  2. Compare and contrast the situation in Italy 1919-22 with that in Germany 1919-29.

    of the Weimar Republic only lasted for 5 years which was not enough to make it an accomplished setup. Although, before going too far people have to realize that the Germans left the war on the 'losing' side of the war, and were forced into signing a treaty which they didn't believe in.

  1. The Revolutions of 1848 were caused by numerous events taking place in Europe. ...

    This prompted the government to pass many socialist programs, including the development of National Workshops. These workshops were state-owned manufacturing organizations in which workers would be guaranteed work. They would soon become crowded with thousands of dissatisfied workers, growing more agitated as time elapses.

  2. Why did the Revolutions of 1848 did not lead to a united Germany?

    The thought of being overthrown was on the mind of every monarch of Europe in February 1848. This cataclysmic event led to many revolutions all over the Bund. The first place to be hit by revolutionary fever was the Rhineland, this region was under Prussian control but because it shared

  1. Why were there two revolutions in Russiain 1917?

    the electorate and because the executive and legislative functions had been blurred. This gave them unusual power. In St. Petersburg a Central Executive Committee of the Soviets was formed. It contained mostly leaders of socialist parties headed by a presidium. The big problem for the Provisional Government was the war.

  2. Why did the early revolutions fail to unite Italy?

    Without a leader the revolutionaries had little time to organise before Francis came back in to the state and in the end, strong forces were taken by the Duke to stamp out the ?flame of rebellion? amongst the people. For many revolutions there was a clear lack of outside and popular support.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work