• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the Russo Japanese war was the biggest cause of the 1905 Revolution in Russia?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐How far do you agree that the Russo Japanese war was the biggest cause of the 1905 Revolution in Russia? Tsar Nicholas II had always desired imperial expansion to the Far East; so naturally Russia clashed with Japan over shared interests in China and Korea. This resulted in the Russo Japanese war to break out. The 1905 Revolution was a different matter; however, they are both connected to each other. The 1905 Revolution was initiated from a peaceful protest by the Surfs but soon transformed into something much bigger. Although the Russo Japanese war played a significant part there was also a variety of other contributing factors; including the great famine, Nicholas II and Bloody Sunday. Firstly, how significant was the Russo Japanese war? In August 1904 Tsar Nicholas II declared war over the Japanese as they refused to let him have Korea under the soviet sphere of influence. Russia was naturally seen as the superior military power of the two but they failed to utilise this. Russia needed Port Arthur as a war water port for military and maritime trade all year round. Vladivostok was only operational in the summer months so the Russians relied heavily on Port Arthur. Yet, in January 1905 the Russians were forced to surrender Port Arthur to the Japanese. However, the greatest humiliation came at the battle of Tsushima in May 1905. ...read more.

Middle

Many Russians began to doubt the current political system and wonder if they would benefit without a Tsar. However, some key left wing figures including Trotsky believed that in some ways it was not Nicholas? fault and that ?Nicholas inherited from his ancestors not only a giant empire, but also a revolution. And they did not bequeath him one quality which would have made him capable of governing and empire?.. Or even a country.? It is clear that Nicholas II rule of even lack of rule compelled many Russians to take matters into their own hands; although some people believed that the revolution was imminent regardless of the ruler it does not redirect attention from the poor decisions made by Nicholas and the disregard for this people. Another important factor which caused the 1905 Revolution is The Great famine of 1891and subsequent famines in 1898 and 1901. In the Volga region in 1891 the winter frosts arrived very early, then the crops where further damaged by the dusty winds in early spring and a very dry long summer which began in April. In 1891 each peasant only managed to salvage 0.1 pud (1.6kg) compared to a normal of 15 pud (240kg) of rye. By autumn, 17 provinces were threatened by the famine which equated to around 36 million people. Almost inevitably a cholera and typhus epidemic struck killing half a million people by the end of 1892. ...read more.

Conclusion

An armed uprising occurred in Moscow on December the 7th and several thousand workers were involved. Yet, they surrendered on 18th of December as the city was destroyed and civilian casualties in the thousands. As we can see, Bloody Sunday was extremely key to the 1905 revolution and can be referred to as the spark that lit the fire. The people finally realised that they could make an impact as shown during the Great Famine. Although the government did manage to extinguish the opposition the people had made enough of an impact for the Tsar to rethink many previously disregarded ideas; and so overall it was a success and more significant than the Russo Japanese war. In conclusion both the Great Famine and Nicholas? suitability for the role of Tsar were very significant in the grand scheme. Along with these the Russo Japanese war was also essential in sparking Bloody Sunday which ultimately was the main cause for the 1905 Russian Revolution. The war was not the most significant factor as although it showed Russia?s weakness it did not directly cause the Revolution, however, Bloody Sunday did do this as it proved to the people that they could stand up against the government. Although both Nicholas II and the Famine were influential they both contributed to the mentality of the people and not directly the revolution. Overall it was a combination of factors which led to the uprising and Bloody Sunday was the last of these consequently lit the fire. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Modern European History, 1789-1945 essays

  1. Stalins Russia, 1924-53 revision guide

    Millions died, especially in the countryside. * A key debate amongst historians is whether the advances could have been achieved in a more humane way, or was Stalin right that the only way to modernise the Soviet Union was by force and terror? Soviet production compared (figures from Culpin/Henig: Modern Europe 1870-1945 and other sources)

  2. 'In the context of the period 1715-1815 to what extent were economic factors the ...

    He accepted that the views of Enlightenment theorists influenced the Revolutionary government but argued that it could not possibly have contributed to its success because people were drawing from their 'own intellects' rather than the 'general bank and capital of nations and of ages'19.

  1. To what extent was Tsar Nicholas II saved by making concessions in the 1905 ...

    'Once they had tasted these new freedoms, the mass of people could never again put their trust in the Tsar' -Orlando Figes. However, 'fear alone kept them in their place' - Orlando Figes, meaning that although the bond with the Tsar and his people had been broken, they feared the power Nicholas II had and so couldn't do anything.

  2. Describe the Russia that Tsar Nicholas II inherited

    In order to modernise, Nicholas II would have needed to give people unity and freedom to replace the middle class and industrialise, and to do this, he had to give the people power. However, his role as an autocrat, and his indifference to the world around him, meant he was

  1. Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905?

    Similarly to the layout of the rest of the revolution it was accidental and unplanned, but substantial enough to cause widespread strikes and rioting as well as the Potemkin mutiny in the months that followed. Father Gapon the priest leading the march is said to have cried out "there is

  2. To what extent were technological changes the biggest feature in the changing nature of ...

    up with this change, resulting in an even more devastating effect, 'Firepower was less important than the morale of soldiers, the defensive less important than the offensive'4 this quote summarises the views of conservative war generals and officers, as they didn't' see the potential killing power of new military technology.

  1. Stalin's Impact On Russia And The Russian People.

    The main consequence of collectivisation was the class war on the kulaks. Stalin strongly believed in 'Dekulakisation', which was central to the collectivisation process. It was important to have a class enemy. Soviet propaganda tried to turn the people against the kulaks.

  2. How far was the Russian Japanese war of 1905 the cause of the 1905 ...

    and Plehve (who was in favour of it) and the incompetence of Tsar, the whole country blamed the government for this war. The Russians felt humiliation and resentment at their loss. The inefficiency of the army and naval forces was exposed which made the idea of revolution seem more favourable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work