• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree that the terms of the Paris peace settlements were too harsh?

Extracts from this document...


How far do you agree that the terms of the Paris peace settlements were too harsh? Most parts of the treaties of the Peace of Paris, particularly in the treaty of Versailles were a cruel corruption of justice. The victorious powers placed extreme demands on Germany that went far beyond simple justice. The Treaty of Versailles was an exceedingly cruel document. Above all harsh was the implication of 'war guilt' placed solely on Germany. Germany was required to accept the allegations from the Allies that it was solely to blame for the war. How could Germany be the only country to blame for the war? It had started when a Serbian shot an Austrian. Right from the beginning of the Peace conferences there was uncertainty about what should be done. Some felt the aim was to punish Germany, others felt it was necessary to cripple Germany to the point that it would never be able to start up another war. Some felt the treaties should reward the winning side and yet others (although these seem to number less than the alternative viewpoints) felt that the point of the treaties was to establish a lasting peace. Germany was not invited to participate. I would assume however, that Germany was not preparing to begin a war but rather that they were preparing for the possibility of war. The war came about because of the mismanagement of a crisis; the assassination of the Archduke Ferdinand, a Serbian shooting an Austrian. ...read more.


The Germans always demanded high reparations so what they do is only being done to them, the only really major losses were the over-sea colonies. If the terms were too harsh on Germany would they have been able to produce twice as much steel as Britain in 1925. In cannot have been too harsh because many new countries were made, some given self-determination and others used as buffer states e.g. Poland and Czechoslovakia. Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia became independent states (acquired by Germany from Russia at Brest-Litovsk). Self-determination formally expresses a central claim of nationalism, namely the entitlement of each nation to its own nation state. And buffer states are a country lying between two rival or potentially hostile greater powers, which by its sheer existence is thought to prevent conflict. Some countries which were taken from the defeated countries, were being mandated (getting prepared for independence) Although Turkey was treated very harshly, they were given a second treaty which was the treaty of Lausanne where turkey gained quite a few of it areas back such as eastern Thrace and 2 Aegean islands. All the countries defeated were given military reductions; this is not harsh as it is trying to prevent another war from beginning. If the countries have good military then they are able to begin a new war but the military should be limited to a certain amount which is enough to defend themselves in the case of invasion. * Manufacturing of weapons is prohibited. ...read more.


However, even the payment of this small percentage of the original reparations (219 billion Gold Reich marks) still placed a significant burden on the German economy, accounting for as much as one third of post-treaty hyperinflation. The provisions forcing the uncompensated removal of resources and industrial equipment sowed further resentment. Since neither rockets nor glider aircraft were mentioned in the Versailles treaty, Germany spent money on these technologies, including Wernher von Braun's rocket experiments, which in no doubt helped the development of the future space industry. Large glider aircraft designs led to the design of the large Me-321 during World War II which later was motorized and become the Me-323, the largest land-based plane at the time. There was the Chanak crisis (1922) and early failures of the League of Nations such as preventing Mussolini from invading Corfu, and the French and Belgians from invading the Ruhr. Most of the decisions made in Paris and various other events lead up the start of World War 2. Many people believed that the war heralded the end of the world as they had known it, including the collapse of capitalism and imperialism. Communist and socialist movements around the world drew strength from this theory, enjoying a level of popularity they had never known before. These feelings were most pronounced in areas directly or particularly harshly affected by the war, such as central Europe, Russia and France. Resources Used * Democracies and Dictatorships- Alan Todd * An introduction to modern history- Alan Farmer ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level International History, 1945-1991 essays

  1. Apart from the Second World War, there was peace in Yugoslavia between 1919 and ...

    Britain, whereas Tito had stayed and fought - he was a war hero and considerably more popular than the Royal Family. By August 1945 (less than 3 months after the end of the war), the monarchy in Yugoslavia was abolished and in the November elections Tito won 80% of the votes (although other political parties had been banned)


    He wanted Germany to have the most powerful armed forces in Europe. Many people were worried by this and thought that Hitler would have to be stopped by force. Q.3 Study SOURCE C. Why were Hitler's plans for Germany likely to cause a war in the 1930s?

  1. How Far Do You Agree That The Paris Peace Settlements Were Too Harsh?

    I think that although it was harsh that Bulgaria, Germany, Austria, Hungary had to admit it was their fault the war happened, as it was really an accident waiting to happen. It was defiantly to be expected; the press, and the public were getting behind Lloyd George (British PM)

  2. Rationality, Educated Opinion and Peace

    Carr adopts Thomas Hobbes' argument on human nature and advances the argument that the state as a rational actor will choose to maximize its capacity for power in order to secure its survival. He argues that public opinion, even when informed, is not necessarily pacifist and that thought can be mould by political purposes.

  1. Vietnam peace movement

    The richer you were the easier it was to dodge conscription. If you had money or were at college, you could put off your service duty, so most of the original soldiers were from poor backgrounds and very inexperienced. As bad news of events in Vietnam seeped back to America

  2. The Peace Settlements and the New Europe 1918-1923

    The problem of Anglo-Frence hostility, the decision of the American senate, and the severe humiliation brought to the German people all point out that the peace settlements after World War One failed to prevent future conflicts. (Binder 81-85) Several different themes must be discussed in order to evaluate this view.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work