• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far do you agree with Elton's interpretation of the roles of Somerset and Northumberland?

Extracts from this document...


How far do you agree with Elton's interpretation of the roles of Somerset and Northumberland? Michael McLoughlin Geoffrey Elton presented a view of Somerset as an incompetent leader, who failed to fill the political vacuum the ascension of an infant monarch had created; nonetheless, he was noble minded and had visionary aims. On the other hand, Elton saw Northumberland as ambitious and power greedy; however, he did recognise that Northumberland had introduced welcome reforms to the finances and administration, which certainly marked an improvement upon Somerset's rule. In this essay, I will argue that Elton's assessment of their reforms and actions was correct, although his judgement of their characters, although true to a certain extent, has been exaggerated. Somerset demonstrated very little concern for humanitarian reform, as has been said by historians such as Elton, and his rule merely exacerbated problems at the end of Henry's reign. However, Northumberland showed more political ability in tackling the equally bad situation he faced and was not as power hungry as Elton suggested. There were significant problems at the end of Henry's reign. His foreign policy had led to a poor financial situation; wars with France and Scotland, although a matter of national pride, actually achieved very little and led to huge debts. Over 2 million had already been spent on the war with Scotland, however victory would have far outweighed these huge financial repercussions. Somerset, therefore, inherited huge financial problems with huge debts and a debased coinage; in addition, the war with Scotland continued and hostilities with France were high. However, it would be a mistake to say that the situation was at a point of no return, Somerset's political inability is demonstrated in his failure to deal with the situation inherited from Henry. Indeed, his actions worsened the financial status of the Crown and served only to escalate discontent in his reign. Somerset's political inability is shown in his failure to discontinue the damaging Scottish war; he didn't realise, as his successor did, that the Scottish war was unsustainable. ...read more.


Northumberland inherited a worse situation than Somerset and demonstrated political astuteness in his action, which dealt with the root of the problem. In addition, his dealings with the Privy Council and use of proclamation were far removed from the power hungry tactics of Somerset. Though his religious policy was arguably harsh and his attempts to alter the succession seem power seeking, Elton exaggerated this element of Northumberland's character. Arguably, Northumberland's best move was to end the Scottish and French wars. Indeed, the way in which the two leaders dealt with the wars can be seen as key in defining their rule and also how we interpret their ability. The treaty of Boulogue, although bad for England in the short-term, allowed the finances to improve and Northumberland to focus on the serious social unrest, Somerset's mess that Northumberland was forced to deal with. The treaty is a clear indication of Northumberland's superior ability to Somerset; indeed, this theme is shown throughout the governance. Far from harming the country, Northumberland had shown realism and taken the first step towards recovery. Furthermore, re-evaluation of the coinage and prohibition of usury in 1552 helped to improve the economy. Northumberland, in contrast with Somerset, made some positive achievements; his economic policies helped to reverse the terrible situation left by Somerset. Moreover, his governance seems to have shown a commitment to reform, which had a current and lasting positive effect. The reformation of the revenue courts was indicative of this commitment to reform. In 1549, five ministries were responsible for collecting money and the situation was worsened by corruption in some courts. Although reform was not carried out under his rule, the recommendations of the Royal Commission were carried out in the Marian era. Therefore, the Boulogue treaty coupled with other economic policies and a clear commitment to financial reform demonstrates that Northumberland was an able politician. Northumberland's economic policies were sound and he should be praised for steering a course out of the economic disaster created by Henry and worsened by Somerset. ...read more.


It is worthy of note that the very nature of Somerset and Northumberland's rules implies a certain extent of power hunger. Their positions relied upon taking advantage of the political vacuum opened up by the infant monarch. Therefore, I would agree with Elton that Northumberland was greedy, however to say that "Northumberland was exceedingly ambitious of power" 14 is an exaggeration and is not supported by his record in power. Lastly, it must be noted that though Northumberland may have displayed some unpleasant character traits, this does not infringe upon the success of his reform programmes. In brief conclusion, I agree with Elton's interpretation of the roles of Somerset and Northumberland to a certain extent. I agree with Elton that Somerset was incompetent and his role did indeed harm the country exacerbating the problems he inherited from Henry. However, Elton's view of Somerset as a humanitarian reformer is an error. Largely, I concur with Elton's view of Northumberland although I would give him more credit for dealing with serious problems he faced and leaving a lasting political influence. Furthermore, he was undoubtedly greedy, yet Elton has exaggerated his desire for power. If we ignore the characters of the two rulers, Elton's general view seems to be that Somerset was damaging whereas Northumberland brought forward marked improvements. In this general sense, I would agree with Elton's thesis. 1 Elton, G.R. England under the Tudors. p. 208 2 Ibid. 3 Ibid. p. 210 4 Ibid. p. 208 5 Heard, N. quoted from Webb, C. "Was it the policies pursued by Henry VIII that caused 'the mid-Tudor crisis'?" <http://www.geocities.com/CollegePark/2809/page15.html> 6 Elton, G.R. England under the Tudors. p. 210 7 Elton, G.R. England under the Tudors. p. 214 8 Ibid. p. 209 9 Ibid. p. 210 10 Smith, A.G.R. The Emergence of a Nation State. p. 71 11 Anderson, A. and Imperato, T. An Introduction to Tudor England 1485-1603. p. 154 12 Elton, G.R. England under the Tudors. p. 209 13 Smith, A.G.R. The Emergence of a Nation State. p. 73 14 Elton, G.R. England under the Tudors. p. 209 Page 6 of 6 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level British History: Monarchy & Politics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How Successful Were the Religious Reforms of Somerset and Northumberland?

    4 star(s)

    Initially this was a fairly cautious approach; Somerset wanted "to appeal to as wide a range of opinion as possible". During the last few years of Henry VIII's reign he allied himself with the evangelicals. King Edward was given a Protestant education which shows a reasonable expectation that there was a vigilant move in the Protestant direction.

  2. Assess the validity of the view that the Rump and Barebones parliaments had no ...

    The number of Acts passed in 1649 had been 125, compared to only 44 in 1652, with the number of legislative committees established also thirding in the same period. The Rump was becoming less and less effective. This is seen by some as the major reason Cromwell dissolved parliament and

  1. How far does Somerset deserve his reputation as the Good Duke? (Somerset (then known ...

    some, being quite selfish and power-hungry, cavorting around as if he was the actual king. As historian Susan Brigden put it (New Worlds, Lost Worlds): 'Since Somerset had taken the devising of policy to himself, his would be the blame if, and when, it failed'.

  2. How far were James I's problems inherited, how far of his own making?

    James could rightly complain about a Parliament which took 23 years to pass a bill on such a contentious issue as monopolies! There was also occasionally very poor attendance in the house. For example, in 1621 James famously and dramatically tore the protestation on the freedom of speech from the

  1. The British reforms to change India failed because the British would sometimes use force ...

    His ideas were rejected and the Conference started again at square one. The Third Round Table Conference was held without any representatives from the Labor Party or Congress. The Conference decided to talk about the right to vote (franchise) and the role of the Indian States but, could not reach any agreement and broke up in 1933.

  2. &amp;quot;Though Forster's epigraph to the novel is 'Only Connect', he rather demonstrates the divided ...

    This woman, Mrs. Avery, mistakes Margaret for being Mrs. Wilcox. Mrs. Avery stated that Margaret had Mrs. Wilcox's 'way of walking.' Some readers might find this way of expressing the spiritual connection rather unconvincing. For instance, the incident at Howards End, can be thought to be too supernatural sounding.

  1. What was the Edwardian Reformation and how successful was it?

    His hestitancy demonstrates how little those pushing through reforms knew of how successful they would be. As a result the Catholic structure of the mass was maintained, along with certain rituals. For the ordinary layman the transformations may not have been that considerable, as the structure of the service did not really alter.

  2. The fall of the Duke of Somerset was principally a result of the impact ...

    After sending Northampton with army of 1,800 men which was crushed by Kett?s 14,000, Somerset sent Warwick with 12,000 soldiers to end the rebellion. There was only ever going to be one winner and with heavy casualties of around 4,000 the Kett rebellion was put down.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work